UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
 
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
 
Check the appropriate box:
 
   
o  Preliminary Proxy Statement
o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted byRule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ  Definitive Proxy Statement
o  Definitive Additional Materials
o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
 
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
 
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
þ  No fee required.
 
o  Fee computed on table below per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
 
     (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 
     (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
 
     (3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange ActRule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
 
     (4)  Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
 
     (5)  Total fee paid:
 
 
o  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
o  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
     (1)  Amount Previously Paid:
 
 
     (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
 
     (3)  Filing Party:
 
 
     (4)  Date Filed:
 


 
(GOODYEAR LOGO)
 
Notice of
2007
2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

and

Proxy Statement
 
 
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
 
1144 East Market Street
Akron, Ohio44316-0001
 
   
DATE:
 April 10, 20077, 2009
   
TIME:
 9:00 A.M.a.m., Akron Time
PLACE:
 Offices Of Theof the Company
Goodyear Theater
1201 East Market Street
Akron, Ohio
 
 
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
 
Please vote. Most shareholders may vote by Internetinternet or telephone as well as by mail.

Please refer to your proxy card or page 4854 of the Proxy Statement for information on how to vote by
Internet
internet or telephone. If you choose to vote by mail, please complete, date and sign your proxy card and
promptly return it in the enclosed envelope.
 


(The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Logo)
 
ROBERT J. KEEGAN
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRESIDENT
 
March 9, 20072009
 
Dear Shareholders:
 
You are cordially invited to attend Goodyear’s 20072009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held at the Goodyear Theater, 1201 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio, at 9:00 A.M.a.m., Akron Time, on Tuesday, April 10, 2007.7, 2009. During the meeting, we will discuss each item of business described in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, and give a report on matters of current interest to our shareholders.
 
This booklet includes the Notice of Annual Meeting as well as the Proxy Statement, which provides information about Goodyear and describes the business we will conduct at the meeting.
 
We hope you will be able to attend the meeting.  Whether or not you plan to attend, it is important that you vote via the Internet,internet, by telephone or by completing, dating, signing and promptly returning your proxy card. This will ensure that your shares will be represented at the meeting. If you attend and decide to vote in person, you may revoke your proxy. Remember, your vote is important!
 
Sincerely,
 
-s- Robert J. Keegan
Robert J. Keegan
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and President


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
  Page
 
  I 
  1 
  1 
  1 
  1 
  1 
  1 
  1 
1
  12 
  12 
  2 
  2 
  3 
  6 
  9 
  910
11 
  1311 
  1412 
  1614 
  1614 
  2429 
  2530 
  2832 
  3134 
  3436 
  3436 
  3639 
  3739 
  4450 
  4652 
  4652 
  4652 
  4753 
  4854 
  4854 
  4854 
  4854 
  4854 
  4955 
  4955 


THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
 
NOTICE OF THE
20072009 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON April 10, 2007APRIL 7, 2009
 
To Thethe Shareholders:
 
The 20072009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation, will be held at the Goodyear Theater (in the Company’sGoodyear’s Principal Office Complex), 1201 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio, on Tuesday, April 10, 20077, 2009 at 9:00 A.M.a.m., Akron Time, for the following purposes:
 
 1. To elect the eleven members of the Board of Directors named in the Proxy Statement to serve one-year terms expiring at the 20082010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Proxy Item 1); and
 
 2.To consider and vote upon amendments to Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors (Proxy Item 2);
3. To consider and vote upon an amendment to Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law (Proxy Item 3);
4. To consider and vote upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Goodyear for 20072009 (Proxy Item 2)4); and
 
 3. To consider and vote upon three Shareholder Proposals (Proxy Items 3, 4, and 5), if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
4.5. To act upon such other matters and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
 
The Board of Directors fixed the close of business on February 16, 200713, 2009 as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 20072009 Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of Goodyear Common Stockcommon stock at the close of business on February 16, 200713, 2009 will be entitled to vote at the 20072009 Annual Meeting and adjournments, if any, thereof.
 
March 9, 20072009
By order of the Board of Directors:
 
-s- C. Thomas Harvie
 
C. Thomas Harvie, Secretary
 
 
Please complete, date and sign your Proxy and return it promptly in the

enclosed envelope, or vote via the Internetinternet or by telephone.


I


 
PROXY STATEMENT
 
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
 
 
GENERAL INFORMATION
 
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation (“Goodyear,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), to be voted at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 10, 20077, 2009 (the “Annual Meeting”), and at any adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice.
 
Goodyear’s executive offices are located at 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio44316-0001. Our telephone number is330-796-2121.
 
Our Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20062008 is enclosed with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report is not considered part of the proxy solicitation materials. The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement and the related materials are first being sent to shareholders is March 9, 2007.2009.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on April 7, 2009:
The Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2008 are available atwww.proxyvote.com.
 
Shares Voting.Holders of shares of the Common Stock,common stock, without par value, of Goodyear (the “Common Stock”) at the close of business on February 16, 200713, 2009 (the “record date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote the shares of Common Stock they hold on the record date at, the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on the record date, there were 180,693,799241,351,132 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.
 
Quorum.In order for any business to be conducted, holders of at least a majority of shares entitled to vote must be represented at the meeting, either in person or by proxy.
 
Adjourned Meeting.The holders of a majority of shares represented at the meeting, whether or not a quorum is present, may adjourn the meeting. If the time and place of the adjourned meeting is announced at the time adjournment is taken, no other notice need be given.
 
Vote Required.  In the election of directors, the eleven candidates receiving the most votes will be elected, subject to Goodyear’s Majority Election of Directors Policy. For a description of that policy, see “Majority Election of Directors Policy” below. Amendments to our Amended Articles of Incorporation (Proxy Item 2) require the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds, and amendments to our Code of Regulations (Proxy Items 2 and 3) require the affirmative vote of at least a majority, of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date. The amendment to the Code of Regulations contemplated by Proxy Item 2 will not be adopted if the related amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation fails to receive the requisite two-thirds affirmative vote. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date is required for any other management or shareholder proposal to be adopted at the Annual Meeting. In the election of directors, the eleven candidates receiving the most votes will be elected.
 
Abstentions “withheld” votes and “broker non-votes”non-votes,” which occur when your broker does not have discretionary voting authority on a matter and you do not affect the election of directors andprovide voting instructions, have the same effect as votes against any proposal voted upon by shareholders.shareholders and have no effect on the election of directors.
 
Cumulative Voting Forfor Directors.In the voting for directors, you have the right to vote cumulatively for the candidates nominated priornominated. Under the Ohio General Corporation Law, all of the shares of Common Stock may be voted cumulatively in the election of directors if any shareholder gives written notice to our President, a Vice President or the voting. InSecretary, not less than 48 hours before the time set for the Annual Meeting, and an announcement of the notice is made at the beginning of the Annual Meeting by the Chairman or the Secretary or by or on behalf of the shareholder giving such notice. If cumulative voting cumulatively for Directors,is in effect, you may (a) give one candidate the number of votes equal to eleven times the number of shares of Common Stock you are entitled to vote, or (b) distribute your votes among the eleven candidates as desired.
 
Majority Election of Directors Policy.  In accordance with Goodyear’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, if a director nominee receives, in any uncontested election of directors for which cumulative voting is not in effect, a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election, he or she will promptly offer his or her resignation as a director to the Board of Directors. Within 90 days, the Board will decide, after taking


1


into account the recommendation of the Governance Committee (in each case excluding the nominee(s) in question), whether to accept the resignation. The Governance Committee and the Board may consider any relevant factors in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. The Board’s explanation of its decision shall be promptly disclosed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Voting Ofof Proxy.Messrs. Richard J. Kramer,Darren R. Wells, C. Thomas Harvie and Bertram Bell, have been designated as proxies to vote (or withhold from voting) shares of Common Stock in accordance with your instructions. You may give your instructions using the accompanying proxy card, via the Internetinternet or by telephone.
 
Your shares will be voted for the eleven nominees identified at pages 6 through 8,9, unless your instructions are to withhold your vote from any one or more of the nominees or to vote cumulatively for one or more of the nominees for election. The proxies may cumulatively vote your shares if they consider it appropriate, except to the extent you expressly withhold authority to cumulate votes as to a nominee.
 
Your Board of Directors anticipates that all of the nominees named will be available for election. In the event an unexpected vacancy occurs, your proxy may be voted for the election of a new nominee designated by the Board of Directors.
 
Proxies received and not revoked prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted in favor of the proposals of the Board of Directors to amend Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors (Proxy Item 2), to amend Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations (Proxy Item 3), and to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Goodyear for 20072009 (Proxy Item 2), and against the shareholder proposals (Proxy Items 3, 4, and 5)4), unless your instructions are otherwise.
 
Voting Shares Held in Street Name.If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote and


1


are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee regarding how to vote your shares. If you do not return the voting instruction card, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, brokers have the discretion to vote on routine matters, such as the election of directors (Proxy Item 1) and the ratification of the selection of an accounting firm (Proxy Item 2)4), but do not have discretionas well as other matters deemed by the New York Stock Exchange to vote on non-routine matters,be routine, such as the shareholder proposalsapproval of amendments to Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors (Proxy Items 3, 4,Item 2) and 5)the approval of an amendment to Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations (Proxy Item 3). If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary authority (a(resulting in a broker non-vote). Broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of Directors,directors, but will have the same effect as a vote against the other proposals.
 
Confidentiality.Your vote will be confidential except (a) as may be required by law, (b) as may be necessary for Goodyear to assert or defend claims, (c) in the case of a contested election of director(s), or (d) at your express request.
 
Revocability Ofof Proxy.You may revoke or revise your proxy (whether given by mail, via the Internetinternet or by telephone) by the delivery of a later proxy or by giving notice to Goodyear in writing or in open meeting. Your proxy revocation or revision will not affect any vote previously taken. If you hold your shares in “street name” please refer to the information forwarded by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered the shareholder of record for procedures on revoking or changing your proxy.


2


 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS
 
Goodyear is committed to having sound corporate governance principles. Having such principles is essential to running Goodyear’s business efficiently and to maintaining Goodyear’s integrity in the marketplace. Goodyear’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Conduct Manual, Board of Directors and Executive Officers ConflictsConflict of Interest Policy and charters for each of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Responsibility and Compliance, Finance, and Governance Committees are available athttp://www.goodyear.com/investor/investor_governance.html. Please note, however, that information contained on the website is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statementProxy Statement or considered to be a part of this document. A copy of the committee charters and corporate governance policies may also be obtained upon request to the Goodyear Investor Relations Department.
 
Board Independence
 
The Board has determined that ten of the current directors (and nine of the nominees) are independent within the meaning of Goodyear’s independence standards, which are based on the criteria established by the New York Stock Exchange and are included as Annex I to Goodyear’s Corporate Governance Guidelines which are available at http://www.goodyear.com/investor/investor_governance.html.Guidelines. Mr. Keegan, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is not considered independent. In addition, in light of his ongoing relationship with the United Steelworkers (the “USW”), Mr. Wessel is not considered independent. Further, the Board expects that Mr. Wessel will recuse himself from discussions and deliberations regarding Goodyear’s relationship with the USW. The Board also determined that the nature and size of the ordinary course commercial relationships between Goodyear and DelphiXerox Corporation and Sprint Nextel Corp. did not implicate the independence of Messrs. O’Neal and Forsee, respectively.Mr. Firestone.
 
Board Structure and Committee Composition
 
As of the date of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, Goodyear’s Board has 12 directors, classified into three classeseach elected annually, and the following five committees: (1) Audit, (2) Compensation, (3) Corporate Responsibility and Compliance, (4) Finance, and (5) Governance. The current membership and the function of each of the committees are described below. Each of the committees operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. All of the committee charters are available on Goodyear’s website at http://www.goodyear.com/investor/investor_governance.html. During the 2006 fiscal year,2008, the Board held 11nine meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable Committee meetings. Directors are encouragedexpected to attend annual meetings of GoodyearGoodyear’s shareholders. All twelveof the directors attended the last annual meeting of shareholders. As described on Goodyear’s website athttp://www.goodyear.com/investor/investorcontactbrd.html,investorcontactbrd.html, shareholders may communicate with the Board or any of the Directorsdirectors (including the Lead Director or the Non-Management Directors as a group) by sending correspondence to the Office of the Secretary, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio44316-0001. All communications will be compiled by the Secretary and submitted to the Board or the individual Directorsdirectors on a periodic basis.
                       
        Corporate
         
        Responsibility
         
        and
         
Name of Director
 Audit  Compensation  Compliance  Finance  Governance  Class(1)
 
Non-Employee Directors
                      
James C. Boland  X*          X      III
John G. Breen  X   X*             II
Gary D. Forsee  X   X              I
William J. Hudson, Jr.       X       X*     II
Steven A. Minter          X*      X  III
Denise M. Morrison      X           X  I
Rodney O’Neal              X   X* II
Shirley D. Peterson  X               X  II
G. Craig Sullivan(2)      X   X          I
Thomas H. Weidemeyer          X   X      I
Michael R. Wessel          X          III
Employee Director
                      
Robert J. Keegan                     II
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2006
  7   4   3   4   5   
                     
        Corporate
       
        Responsibility
       
        and
       
Name of Director
 Audit  Compensation  Compliance  Finance  Governance 
 
Non-Management Directors
                    
James C. Boland*  X**              X 
James A. Firestone*  X           X     
W. Alan McCollough*  X               X**
Steven A. Minter*          X       X 
Denise M. Morrison*      X   X**        
Rodney O’Neal*      X       X     
Shirley D. Peterson*  X               X 
Stephanie A. Streeter*(1)              X   X 
G. Craig Sullivan*      X**      X     
Thomas H. Weidemeyer*      X       X**    
Michael R. Wessel          X         
Management Director
                    
Robert J. Keegan(2)                    
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2008
  6   7   3   3   5 
 
X = Committee member; * = Chair; Independent; ** = Chair
(1) Beginning with the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders all directors will be elected to one year terms and the Board will no longer be classified. (2) Mr. SullivanMs. Streeter has been a director since April 11, 2006.October 7, 2008.
(2) Mr. Keegan does not serve on any Board committees, although he participates in many committee meetings as Chairman of the Board.


3


 
Audit Committee
 
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for oversight of the integrity of Goodyear’s financial statements, Goodyear’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to financial reporting, the independent accountants’registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of Goodyear’s internal auditors and independent accountants.registered public accounting firm. Among other things, the Audit Committee prepares the Audit Committee report for inclusion in the annual proxy statement; annually reviews the Audit Committee charter and the committee’sCommittee’s performance; appoints, evaluates and determines the compensation of Goodyear’s independent accountants;registered public accounting firm; reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit plan; reviews and pre-approves all auditing services and permitted non-audit services (and related fees) to be performed by the independent accountants;registered public accounting firm; oversees investigations into complaints concerning financial matters; and reviews policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including Goodyear’s major financial risk exposures. The Audit Committee works closely with management as well as Goodyear’s independent accountants.registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from, and receive appropriate funding from Goodyear for, outside legal, accounting or other advisors as the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of Goodyear’s independence standards and applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, and each of Messrs. Boland Breen, and ForseeMcCollough is an audit committee financial expert. The report of the Audit Committee is on page 4753 of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
 
Compensation Committee
 
The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee primary responsibility for establishing and administering Goodyear’s compensation programs for executive officers and other key personnel. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee oversees Goodyear’s compensation and benefit plans and policies, administers its stock plans (including reviewing and recommending equity grants to executive officers)officers and other key personnel), and reviews and approves annually all compensation decisions relating to executive officers, including those for the CEO and other executive officers.CEO. The Compensation Committee also prepares a report on executive compensation for inclusion in the annual proxy statement and reviews and discusses the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and recommends its inclusion in the annual proxy statement. The Reportreport of the Compensation Committee is on page 2429 of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement.
 
In performing its duties, the Compensation Committee meets periodically with the CEO to review compensation policies and specific levels of compensation paid to executive officers and other key personnel, and reports and makes recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation policies and programs. The Compensation Committee informs the independentnon-management directors of the Board regardingof its decisions regarding compensation for the CEO and other elected officers. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to one or more of its members as appropriate.
 
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate outside advisors, including compensation consultants, to assist it in evaluating actual and proposed compensation for executive officers. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to approve any such consultant’s fees and the other terms of such retention. From time to time, the Compensation Committee solicits advice from an outside compensation consultant, Towers Perrin,consultants on executive compensation matters relating to the CEO and other executive officers. This advice has consisted primarily of assistance with benchmarking compensation for senior executives and directors, and advice on current and evolving market practices in the areasfor specific components of perquisites, change in control benefits,compensation, such as incentive awards, severance and retiree medical benefits.change-in-control protection policies, non-qualified benefit plans and perquisites.
 
Committee on Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
 
The Committee on Corporate Responsibility and Compliance reviews Goodyear’s legal compliance programs as well as its business conduct policies and practices and its policies and practices regarding its relationships with shareholders, employees, customers, governmental agencies and the general public. The Committee may also recommend appropriate new policies to the Board of Directors.


4


Finance Committee
 
The Finance Committee consults with management and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding Goodyear’s capital structure, dividend policy, tax strategies, compliance with terms in financing arrangements, risk management strategies, banking arrangements and lines of credit, and pension plan funding. The Finance Committee also reviews and consults with management regarding policies with respect to interest rate


4


and foreign exchange risk, liquidity management, counter partycounterparty risk, derivative usage, credit ratings, and investor relations activities.
 
Governance Committee
 
The Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends to the Board of Directors candidates for election to the Board of Directors. The Committee also develops and recommends appropriate corporate governance guidelines, recommends policies and standards for evaluating the overall effectiveness of the Board of Directors in the governance of Goodyear and undertakes such other activities as may be delegated to it from time to time by the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that each member of the Governance Committee is independent.
 
Consideration of Director Nominees
 
The policy of the Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholder nominations forof candidates for membership on the Board as described below under “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director.” In evaluating such nominations, the Governance Committee seeks to address the criteria described below under “Director Selection Guidelines” as well as any needs for particular expertise on the Board.
 
Any shareholder desiring to submit a proposed candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee should send the name of such proposed candidate, together with biographical data and background information concerning the candidate, to: The Secretary, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio44316-0001.
 
Director Selection Guidelines
 
The Board of Directors has approved Director Selection Guidelines that apply to prospective Board members. Under these criteria, members of the Board should have a reputation for high moral character, integrity and sound judgment, substantial business expertise, financial literacy, achievement in his or her chosen field, should have adequate time to devote to Goodyear, and should have the ability to effectively serve several years prior to retirement at age 70. A person’s particular expertise and ability to satisfy Goodyear’s independence standards and those of the New York Stock Exchange may also be evaluated. Each Director must have the ability to fully represent Goodyear’s diverse constituencies.
 
Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director
 
The Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as management and shareholders. The Committee also retains third-party executive search firms to identify candidates. In addition, under our prior master labor agreement with the United Steelworkers (the “USW”),USW, the USW had the right to nominate a candidate for consideration for membership on the Board. Mr. Wessel, who became a Director in December 2005, was identified and recommended by the USW. Mr. SullivanMs. Streeter was identified initially identified as a candidate for membership to the Board by a third-party search firm.Mr. Keegan.
 
Once a prospective nominee has been identified, the Committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination is based on whatever information is provided to the Committee with the recommendation of the prospective candidate, as well as the Committee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional Board members and the likelihood that the prospective nominee can satisfy the Director Selection Guidelines described above. If the Committee determines, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board and other Board members as appropriate, that additional consideration is warranted, it may request a third-party search firm to gather additional information about the prospective nominee’s background and experience and to report its findings to the Committee. The Committee then evaluates the prospective nominee against the standards and qualifications set out in Goodyear’s Director Selection Guidelines.


5


The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for Audit Committee expertise and the evaluations of other prospective nominees. In connection with this evaluation, the Committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee, and if warranted, one or more members of the Committee, and others as appropriate, interview prospective nominees in person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation and interview, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be elected to the Board, and the Board makes its decision after considering the recommendation and report of the Committee.


5


Executive Sessions
 
Non-management Directorsdirectors meet regularly in executive sessions without management. An executive session is generally held in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Executive sessions are led by a “Lead Director,” who is elected by the Board. Mr. John G. BreenBoland currently serves as the Lead Director.
 
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Item 1 on your Proxy)
 
The Board of Directors has selected the following eleven nominees recommended by the Governance Committee for election to the Board of Directors. The Company’s Code of Regulations setsAlthough the number of directors is currently set at eleven, but authorizestwelve, on December 9, 2008, the Board to increasedetermined that as of the date of the Annual Meeting the number of directors to no more than fifteen persons, and to decrease the number of directors to no less than nine persons. On February 27, 2007, the Board set the number of directors at eleven, effective immediately prior to the annual meeting.would be eleven. The directors will hold office from their election until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or until their successors are elected and qualified. If any of these nominees for director becomes unavailable, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote for any alternate designated by the current Board of Directors.
 
JAMES C. BOLAND
 
Retired.  Formerly Vice Chairman of Cavaliers Operating Company, LLC
 
Mr. Boland was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cavs/Gund Arena Company (the Cleveland Cavaliers professional basketball team and Gund Arena) from 1998 to December 31, 2002. He becamewas Vice Chairman of that organization onfrom January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2007, which, following a change in ownership, was renamed the Cavaliers Operating Company, LLC. Prior to his retirement from Ernst & Young in 1998, Mr. Boland served for 22 years as a partner of Ernst & Young in various roles including Vice Chairman and Regional Managing Partner, as well as a member of the firm’s Management Committee. Mr. Boland is also a director of Invacare Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company.
 
Age: 6769
 
Director since: December 18, 2002
 
JOHN G. BREENJAMES A. FIRESTONE
 
Retired.  Formerly ChairmanExecutive Vice President and President, Corporate Operations of the Board of The Sherwin-Williams Company, a manufacturer of paints, coatings and related products.Xerox Corporation
 
Mr. BreenFirestone is an Executive Vice President of Xerox Corporation and has been President, Corporate Operations since September 2008. Mr. Firestone was the ChairmanPresident of Xerox North America from October 2004 to September 2008. He has also served as head of Xerox’s channels group and as chief strategy officer. Before joining Xerox in 1998, Mr. Firestone worked for IBM Corporation as general manager of the BoardConsumer Division and Chief Executive Officerfor Ameritech Corporation as president of The Sherwin-Williams Company from January 15, 1979Consumer Services. He began his business career in 1978 with American Express, where during his15-year tenure he ultimately rose to October 25, 1999, when he retired as Chief Executive Officer. He served as Chairman of the Board of The Sherwin-Williams Company until April 26, 2000, when he retired. HePresident, Travelers Cheques. Mr. Firestone is also a director of The Stanley Works.Japan Fund, Inc.
 
Age: 7254
 
Director since: January 7, 1992
WILLIAM J. HUDSON, JR.
Retired.  Formerly President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of AMP, Incorporated, a global manufacturer of electrical and electronic components and assemblies.
Mr. Hudson was the President and Chief Executive Officer of AMP, Incorporated from January 1, 1993 to August 10, 1998. Mr. Hudson served as the Vice Chairman of AMP, Incorporated from August 10, 1998 to April 30, 1999. Mr. Hudson is a member of the Executive Committee of the United States Council for International Business.
Age: 72
Director since: November 7, 1995
December 3, 2007


6


 
ROBERT J. KEEGAN
 
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Goodyear
 
Mr. Keegan joined Goodyear on October 1, 2000, and he was elected President and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Goodyear on October 3, 2000 and President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2003. Mr. Keegan became Chairman of the Board effective July 1, 2003. Prior to joining Goodyear, Mr. Keegan was an Executive Vice President of Eastman Kodak Company. He held various marketing, financial and managerial posts at Eastman Kodak Company from 1972 through September 2000, except for a two year period beginning in 1995 when he was an Executive Vice President of Avery Dennison Corporation.
 
Age: 5961
 
Director since: October 3, 2000
 
STEVEN A. MINTER
W.  ALAN McCOLLOUGH
 
Retired.  Formerly PresidentChairman and Chief Executive DirectorOfficer of The Cleveland Foundation, a community trust devoted to health, education, social services and civic and cultural affairs.Circuit City Stores Inc.
 
Mr. MinterMcCollough was theelected Chairman, President and Chief Executive DirectorOfficer of The Cleveland Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, from January 1, 1984 to June 30, 2003, when he retired. Since September 1, 2003, Mr. Minter hasCircuit City Stores Inc., a consumer electronic retailer, in 2002 and served in that capacity until 2005. He remained Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until his retirement in 2006. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2002 and as President and Chief Operating Officer from 1997 to 2000. Mr. McCollough joined Circuit City in 1987 as general manager of corporate operations, and was named assistant vice president in 1989, president of central operations in 1991, and senior vice president of merchandising in 1994. Mr. McCollough is also a part-time Executive-in-Residence at Cleveland State University.director of VF Corporation andLa-Z-Boy Inc.
 
Age: 6859
 
Director since: February 12, 1985April 10, 2007
 
DENISE M. MORRISON
 
Senior Vice President and President — North America Soup, Sauces and Beverages, Campbell USA Soup Sauce and BeverageCompany
 
Ms. Morrison has served as theSenior Vice President and President — North America Soup, Sauces and Beverages of Campbell Soup Company since October 2007. From June 2005 to October 2007 she was President of the Campbell USA Soup, Sauce and Beverage division of The Campbell Soup Company since June 2005. Fromand from April 2003 to June 2005 she served as Campbell Soup’swas President of Global Sales and Chief Customer Officer. She has been a Senior Vice President of Campbell Soup since April 2003. Prior to joining Campbell Soup, Ms. Morrison served in various managerial positions at Kraft Foods, including as Executive Vice President/General Manager of the Snacks Division from October 2001 to March 2003 and the Confections Division from January 2001 to September 2001. Ms. Morrison also served in various managerial positions at Nabisco Inc. from 1995 to 2000 and at Nestle USA from 1984 to 1995.
 
Age: 5355
 
Director since:  February 23, 2005
 
RODNEY O’NEAL
 
Chief Executive Officer and President, Delphi Corporation
 
Mr. O’Neal has served in various managerial positions at Delphi Corporation since 19992000 and has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President since January 1, 2007. Mr. O’Neal also serves on Delphi’s BoardHe was President and Chief Operating Officer of Directors.Delphi Corporation from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006. Mr. O’Neal also served in various managerial and engineering positions at General Motors Corporation from 1976 to 1999, including Vice President of General Motors and President of Delphi Interior Systems prior to Delphi’s separation from General Motors. Mr. O’Neal is also a director of the Delphi Corporation and Sprint Nextel Corporation.
 
Age: 5355
 
Director since: February 3, 2004


7


 
SHIRLEY D. PETERSON
 
Retired.  Formerly partner in the law firm of Steptoe & Johnson LLP
 
Mrs. Peterson was President of Hood College from 1995-2000.1995 to 2000. From 1989 to 1993 she served in the U.S. Government, first appointed by the President as Assistant Attorney General in the Tax Division of the Department of Justice, then as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. She was also a partner in the law firm of Steptoe & Johnson LLP where she served a total of 22 years from 1969 to 1989 and from 1993 to 1994. Mrs. Peterson is also a director of AK Steel Corp.,Corporation, Champion Enterprises, Federal-Mogul Corp.,Inc. and Wolverine Worldwide Inc. and is an independent trustee for DWS Scudder Mutual Funds.
 
Age: 6567
 
Director since: April 13, 2004


STEPHANIE A. STREETER
Formerly Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Banta Corporation
Ms. Streeter joined Banta Corporation, a provider of printing and supply chain management services, as President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2001, was elected Chief Executive Officer in 2002 and Chairman in 2004. She served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Banta until its acquisition by R.R. Donnelley & Sons in 2007. Ms. Streeter also spent 14 years with Avery Dennison Corporation in a variety of product and business management positions, including as Group Vice President of Worldwide Office Products from 1996 to 2000. Ms. Streeter is also a director of Kohl’s Corporation.
Age: 51
Director since: October 7,

2008


 
G. CRAIG SULLIVAN
 
Retired.  FormerFormerly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Clorox Company
 
Mr. Sullivan served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Clorox from 1992 to 2003. Prior to assuming the top positionthat role in 1992, he served in various managerial positions at Clorox including group vice president responsible for both manufacturing and marketing of household products for Clorox.products. Before joining Clorox, Mr. Sullivan held various sales management positions with The Procter & Gamble Company and American Express. Mr. Sullivan is also a director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Mattel, Inc.
 
Age: 6668
 
Director since: April 11, 2006
 
THOMAS H. WEIDEMEYER
 
Retired.  Formerly Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc.
 
Until his retirement in February 2004, Mr. Weidemeyer served as Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc., the world’s largesta transportation and logistics company, since January 2001, and President and Chief Operating Officer of UPS Airlines since JuneJuly 1994. Mr. Weidemeyer became Manager of the Americas International Operation in 1989, and in that capacity directed the development of the UPS delivery network throughout Central and South America. In 1990, Mr. Weidemeyer became Vice President and Airline Manager of UPS Airlines and in 1994 was elected its President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Weidemeyer became Manager of the Air Group and a member of the Management Committee that same year. In 1998 he was elected as a Director and he became Chief Operating Officer of United Parcel Service, Inc. in 2001. Mr. Weidemeyer is also a director of NRG Energy, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.
 
Age: 5961
 
Director since: December 9, 2004


8


 
MICHAEL R. WESSEL
 
President of The Wessel Group Incorporated
 
Mr. Wessel has served as President of The Wessel Group Incorporated, a government and political affairs consulting firm, since May 2006. Prior to founding the Wessel Group, Mr. Wessel served as a consultant forSenior Vice President of the Downey McGrath Group, a government affairs consulting firm, from March 1999 to December 2005 and as Executive Vice President from January 2006 to April 2006. Mr. Wessel is an attorney with almost 30 years experience as a policy and international trade advisor in Washington, D.C. In 1977, as a staff assistant to Congressman Richard Gephardt, he advised government officials on a wide range of domestic and international issues, and in 1984 heissues. He was named legislative director. In 1989, he became thedirector in 1984, policy director in 1989 and general counsel in 1991 he was named general counsel for the Congressman.Congressman Gephardt. Mr. Wessel also served as a key economic and trade policy advisor for Mr. Gephardt’s presidential campaigns in1987-88 and2003-04, as well as John Kerry’s campaign in 2004. He was a senior policy advisor for the Clinton/Gore Transition Office in 1992 and 1993.
 
Age: 4749
 
Director since: December 6, 2005
 
AsMr. Steven A. Minter was not nominated for re-election to the Board of Directors due to the retirement age provisions of Goodyear’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Minter will be retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting after 24 years of distinguished service. Goodyear and the Board of Directors are deeply grateful for his leadership and guidance during his tenure on the Board.
PROPOSAL TO AMEND GOODYEAR’S AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND CODE OF REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR THE MAJORITY ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Item 2 on your Proxy)
Our Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve an amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation requiring a resultmajority vote for the election of his responsibilities at Sprint Nextel Corp., where hedirectors in uncontested elections for which cumulative voting is Chairmannot in effect. The Board also recommends that the shareholders approve an amendment to the Code of Regulations to delete a provision mandating that, in all elections of directors, the candidate receiving the greatest number of votes, a plurality vote, shall be elected. The Amended Articles currently do not specify the voting standard for the election of directors. Consequently, the Regulations provision, consistent with the default provisions of Ohio law, currently governs the Company’s director voting standard. Shareholder approval is required for the adoption of the proposed amendments to the Amended Articles and the Regulations.
In February 2008, our Board Chief Executive Officerof Directors adopted a policy to assure that, in an uncontested election for which cumulative voting is not in effect, a director who fails to receive a greater number of votes “for” his or her election than votes “withheld” from such election would promptly offer his or her resignation to the Board. The Board would then decide, through a process managed by the Governance Committee, whether to accept the resignation. Our Majority Election of Directors Policy is included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on the Company’s website at www.goodyear.com/investor/investorgovernance.html, and President,is described on page 1 of this Proxy Statement.
Historically, Ohio law provided that each director nominee who receives the highest number of affirmative votes cast is elected, regardless of whether such votes constitute a majority of all votes cast (including votes withheld). This system, referred to as plurality voting, has always been utilized by the Company for director elections. Ohio law was amended, effective January 1, 2008, to provide that the articles of incorporation may set forth alternative election standards, and, in particular due to overlapping Board meeting datesif no alternative is specified in the future, Mr. Gary D. Forsee, currentlyarticles, plurality voting would continue to apply.
For the past few years, the Board has monitored developments in corporate governance closely as the practices surrounding the majority vote standard have evolved. Over that time, the legal and other potential consequences of adopting a Class I Director,majority vote standard have become clearer. A number of public companies have adopted some form of a majority vote standard, and there is now more experience and knowledge as to how it can be implemented. The Board has declinedcontinued to stand for reelection.evaluate the merits, risks and uncertainties relating to a majority vote standard and, after careful consideration, believes it is now in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to strengthen the


89


approach initially adopted by the Company by amending the Amended Articles of Incorporation and the Code of Regulations to provide for a majority vote standard.
This would ensure that each vote is specifically counted “for” or “against” a director’s election, and would further enhance the accountability of each director to the Company’s shareholders. No director would be elected unless he or she received more votes cast “for” than “against” his or her election.
The proposed amendments to the Amended Articles and the Regulations would provide for a majority vote standard in our Amended Articles that could not be further amended without shareholder approval and would delete the requirement for plurality voting from the Regulations. If the proposed amendments are adopted, an affirmative majority of the total number of votes cast with respect to the election of a director nominee will be required for election in an uncontested election for which cumulative voting is not in effect. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” will have no effect in determining whether the required affirmative majority vote has been obtained. For contested elections or elections for which cumulative voting is in effect, plurality voting would apply.
If this proposal is approved by the shareholders, the following new article will be added to the Amended Articles:
“SEVENTH: In order for a nominee to be elected a director of the corporation in an uncontested election for which cumulative voting is not in effect, the nominee must receive a greater number of votes cast “for” his or her election than “against” his or her election. In a contested election or if cumulative voting is in effect, the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes shall be elected, up to the number of directors to be elected. An election shall be considered contested if there are more nominees for election than director positions to be filled in that election.”
And the following provision of the Regulations (Article II, Section 2) will be amended as follows:
“At a meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, only persons nominated as candidates shall be eligible for election as directors and the candidates receiving the greatest number of votes shall be elected.”
If this proposal is approved by the shareholders, our current Majority Election of Directors Policy would remain in effect only to the extent needed to address “holdover” terms for any incumbent directors who fail to be re-elected under the new majority vote standard. Under Ohio law, an incumbent director who is not re-elected will continue in office as a “holdover” director until his or her successor is elected by a subsequent shareholder vote, or his or her earlier resignation, removal from office or death.
Adoption of the amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds, and adoption of the amendment to the Code of Regulations requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority, of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date. The amendment to the Code of Regulations contemplated by this Proxy Item 2 will not be adopted if the related amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation fails to receive the requisite two-thirds affirmative vote.
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR approval of the amendments to Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors (Proxy Item 2).
PROPOSAL TO AMEND GOODYEAR’S CODE OF REGULATIONS TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO AMEND THE REGULATIONS TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE OHIO GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
(Item 3 on your Proxy)
Our Board of Directors recommends that the Code of Regulations be amended by adding a provision authorizing the Board to make future amendments to the Regulations to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law. For Ohio corporations, regulations are the equivalent of by-laws.
Our Regulations were first adopted in 1955 and contain many awkward and out-of-date provisions. The Board of Directors is not currently permitted to amend the Regulations. Previously, Ohio law did not permit the Board to amend the Regulations.
The Ohio General Corporation Law was amended in October 2006 to allow the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations without shareholder approval, within certain statutory limitations, thus bringing Ohio law into line with the law of most other states. However, the amended Ohio statute requires us to first seek shareholder approval in order for the Board to make future amendments to the Regulations. Other Ohio corporations have made this change to allow their regulations to be updated.


10


Under the 2006 amendments to the Ohio General Corporation Law, the Board is not permitted to amend the Regulations in various areas that impact fundamental shareholder rights. Specifically, the Board may not amend the Regulations to do any of the following: (1) change the authority of the shareholders themselves; (2) establish or change the percentage of shares that must be held by shareholders in order to call a shareholders meeting or change the time period required for notice of a shareholders meeting; (3) establish or change the quorum requirements at shareholder meetings; (4) prohibit the shareholders or directors from taking action by written consent without a meeting; (5) change directors’ terms of office or provide for the classification of directors; (6) change the quorum or voting requirements at directors meetings; or (7) remove the requirement that a “control share acquisition” of an “issuing public corporation” must be approved by the shareholders of the corporation to be acquired. In addition, the Board may not delegate the authority to amend the Regulations to a Board Committee. This proposal does not seek to change in any way these limitations placed on the Board under the Ohio General Corporation Law with respect to amendments to the Regulations, and would only allow the Board to amend the Regulations to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law.
Under Ohio law, the shareholders can always override amendments made by the Board, and the Regulations may never divest the shareholders of the power to adopt, amend or repeal the Regulations.
The Board of Directors recommends that Article X of the Regulations be amended to add the following underlined language:
“The Regulations of the Company may be amended or new Regulations may be adopted by the shareholders, at a meeting held for such purpose by the affirmative vote of the holders of shares entitling them to exercise a majority of the voting power of the Company on such proposal or, without a meeting, by the written consent of the holders of shares entitling them to exercise two-thirds of the voting power on such proposal.The Regulations of the Company may also be amended by the directors to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law.”
Adoption of the amendment to the Regulations requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding Common Stock.
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR approval of an amendment to Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations (Proxy Item 3).
 
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Item 24 on your Proxy)
 
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit Goodyear’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and its internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year endingas of December 31, 2007.2009. During fiscal year 2006,2008, PwC served as Goodyear’s independent registered public accounting firm and also provided audit related,audit-related, tax and other services. See “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” on page 46. Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the meeting, where they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.52.
 
The following resolution will be presented by yourthe Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting:
 
“RESOLVED, that the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent accountantsregistered public accounting firm for the Company for the year ending December 31, 20072009 is hereby ratified.”
 
In the event the appointment of PwC is not ratified by the shareholders, the adverse vote will be deemed to be an indication to the Audit Committee that it should consider selecting otheranother independent accountantsregistered public accounting firm for 2008.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholder Proposal #1
(Item 3 on your Proxy)
The proposal set forth below has been submitted by a shareholder.
3 — Adopt Simple Majority Vote
RESOLVED:  Comprehensive Commitment to Adopt Simple Majority Vote. Shareholders recommend that our Board take each step necessary for adoption of a simple majority vote to apply to the greatest extent possible. This includes using all means in our Board’s power such as corresponding special company solicitations andone-on-one management contacts with major shareholders to obtain the majority vote required for formal adoption of this proposal topic.
This proposal is not intended to unnecessarily limit our Board’s judgment in crafting the requested change to the fullest extent feasible in accordance with applicable laws and existing governance documents.
Victor Rossi, P.O. Box 249, Boonville, CA 95415 sponsors this proposal.
This topic won our 73% yes-vote at our 2006 annual meeting. At least one proxy advisory service has recommended a no-vote for directors who do not adopt a shareholder proposal after it wins one majority vote. This topic also won a 67% yes-vote average at 19 major companies in 2006. The Council of Institutional Investorswww.cii.org formally recommends adoption of this proposal topic.
Our current rule allows a small minority to frustrate the will of our shareholder majority. For example, in requiring a 67% vote to make certain key governance changes at our company, if 66% vote yes and only 1% vote no — only 1% could force their will on our overwhelming 66% majority.
It is important to take one step forward and support this proposal since our 2006 governance standards were not impeccable. For instance in 2006, it was reported (and certain concerns are noted):
• Goodyear funded a $1 million director gift plan that could impact our directors’ independence.
• No shareholder right to Act by Written Consent.
• No director stock ownership requirement.
• No independent chairman.
• Our lead director was age 72 and may not be optimally independent due to his long tenure.
• Two directors had long tenure of 14 to 21 years each which may negatively impact objectivity or independence.
• Two directors may be overcommitted with more than four (4) board seats each.
The above status shows there is room for improvement and reinforces the reason to take one step forward now and vote yes for simple majority vote.
Adopt Simple Majority Vote
Yes on 3


9


STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OPPOSING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL #1
ITEM 3
Your Board of Directors recommends a voteagainstthis shareholder proposal for the following reasons:
The proposal is confusing because it is unclear whether “simple majority vote” refers to a majority of the shares outstanding or a majority of votes cast. If the proponent intends the latter, then the Company would be unable to change the voting requirements with respect to the two matters described below as the minimum vote required under Ohio law for amending either the Articles of Incorporation or Code of Regulations is a majority of the shares outstanding.
Almost all shareholder votes at Goodyear are already determined by a majority vote of the outstanding shares. Under Goodyear’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations there are two actions which require a vote of more than a majority of the outstanding shares: an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation and the removal of a Director. Each requires a two-thirds vote of the outstanding shares. Amending either of these provisions to reduce the voting threshold to a majority of the outstanding shares would require the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares. However, the Board believes that it is still appropriate to require a two-thirds vote for these two matters and therefore opposes this proposal.
Assuming that “simple majority votes” refers to a majority of the shares outstanding, the Board believes that any concerns regarding the two-thirds requirement for removal of a director have been effectively addressed by the Board’s proposal in last year’s proxy statement to provide for the annual election of directors. As a result of the passage of that proposal, beginning this year all directors will be elected to one-year terms. Further, given that, under Ohio law, shareholders have the right to vote cumulatively for directors, elimination of the two-thirds removal requirement has the potential to frustrate the rights of a minority of shareholders that may have voted for the election of a particular director. With respect to amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, — which in general deal only with the composition of the Company’s capital structure — the two-thirds requirement ensures that key corporate decisions, such as last year’s proposal to increase the number of authorized shares, have the wide support of shareholders.
The Board also strongly takes issue with the proponent’s characterization of the Company’s corporate governance practices. Goodyear has an independent, active and effective Board of Directors committed to the highest quality corporate governance. In addition to continually updating its Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Board practices, the Board has enacted many governance enhancements. For example, in recent years, the Board of Directors has responded to shareholder concerns by proposing to amend our Code of Regulations to provide for the annual election of directors, effected an early termination of Goodyear’s “poison pill” and adopted a formal policy to address shareholder proposals that receive a majority of the votes cast. Finally, the Board notes that each Director makes a significant contribution regardless of the length of their tenure and other responsibilities. Moreover, each year the Governance Committee conducts an evaluation of the full Board in order to ensure its effectiveness and improve its performance.
In sum, the Board believes that Goodyear’s few supermajority voting requirements promote the Board’s longstanding goal of providing effective governance and value protection for the long-term benefit of shareholders.
Your Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST the adoption of Shareholder Proposal #1 (Proxy Item 3).
Shareholder Proposal #2
(Item 4 on your Proxy)
The proposal set forth below has been submitted by a shareholder.
Pay-for-Superior-Performance Proposal
RESOLVED:  That the shareholders of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Company”) request that the Board of Director’s Executive Compensation Committee establish apay-for-superior-performance standard in the Company’s executive compensation plan for senior executives (“Plan”), by incorporating the following principles into the Plan:
1. The annual incentive or bonus component of the Plan should utilize defined financial performance criteria that can be benchmarked against a disclosed peer group of companies, and provide that an annual bonus is


10


awarded only when the Company’s performance exceeds its peers’ median or mean performance on the selected financial criteria;
2. The long-term compensation component of the Plan should utilize defined financial and/or stock price performance criteria that can be benchmarked against a disclosed peer group of companies. Options, restricted shares, or other equity or non-equity compensation used in the Plan should be structured so that compensation is received only when the Company’s performance exceeds its peers’ median or mean performance on the selected financial and stock price performance criteria; and
3. Plan disclosure should be sufficient to allow shareholders to determine and monitor the pay and performance correlation established in the Plan.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
We feel it is imperative that compensation plans for senior executives be designed and implemented to promote long-term corporate value. A critical design feature of a well-conceived executive compensation plan is a close correlation between the level of pay and the level of corporate performance relative to industry peers. We believe the failure to tie executive compensation to superior corporate performance; that is, performance exceeding peer group performance, has fueled the escalation of executive compensation and detracted from the goal of enhancing long-term corporate value.
We believe the Company’s Plan fails to promote thepay-for-superior-performance principle. Our Proposal offers a straightforward solution: The Compensation Committee should establish and disclose financial and stock price performance criteria and set peer group-related performance benchmarks that permit awards or payouts in its annual and long-term incentive compensation plans only when the Company’s performance exceeds the median of its peer group. A senior executive compensation plan based on soundpay-for-superior-performance principles will help moderate excessive executive compensation and create competitive compensation incentives that will focus senior executives on building sustainable long-term corporate value.
We urge you to vote FOR this resolution.
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OPPOSING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL #2
ITEM 4
Your Board of Directors recommends a voteagainstthis shareholder proposal for the following reasons:
Pay-for-performance is already the single most important principle underlying Goodyear’s executive compensation system. This emphasis has helped drive strong performance since Mr. Keegan became Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2003: during the4-year period from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2006, total shareholder return on Goodyear’s common stock was 208.2%, compared with a total return during the same period of 73.3% for the S&P 500. This performance occurred during a period in which Goodyear faced a number of substantial challenges facing the tire industry generally, such as increasing competition from low-cost manufacturers, manufacturing overcapacity and rising raw material prices. During this period, Goodyear was also faced with several company-specific challenges, such as two significant negotiations with the United Steelworkers on the terms of a master labor agreement covering most of its manufacturing facilities in North America, the implementation of a comprehensive financing strategy, and the need to implement significant cost reductions.
Goodyear’s emphasis on pay for performance is reflected in the mix of the components of an executive officer’s compensation. Annual base salaries are targeted below median market rates and a significant portion of an executive’s compensation is in the form of annual bonuses and long-term incentive awards tied to the performance of the Company. The performance measures for these awards are based primarily on the Company’s budgetary process and are usually expressed in terms of attainment of cash flow, EBIT or net income targets. For 2006, approximately 80% of compensation for executive officers was tied to the performance of the Company. (See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis at page 16 for more information about Goodyear’s compensation program.)
The Company believes that linking performance goals to its own circumstances and planning process, as opposed to the financial performance of peers, is the most effective way to maximize shareholder value. Since at any point in time peer companies can be in different circumstances from Goodyear or seeking to implement different strategies, linking incentives only to a comparison against peer performance on various measures could have unintended and unwanted consequences. For example, at a time when one or more large peer companies are


11


facing challenges unique to them, the Company might outperform its peers yet not deliver on its own targets for growth and profitability. The Committee may not want to reward senior executives under such circumstances and believes that the better course is for the Company, under the oversight of the Board, to set the right business goals for itself, and then to align senior executive compensation with performance against those goals.
While the Compensation Committee believes that the primary focus of our incentive criteria should be Company-specific goals, it does factor peer comparisons into its compensation decisions and philosophy. For example, the Compensation Committee generally targets primary compensation levels for executive officers either at median market rate or somewhat above such rate for comparable companies. For these purposes, in 2006 the Compensation Committee determined “market” rates by considering a number of groups of companies including companies ranked between 60th and 180th on theFortune500 rankings and 18 peer companies in the industrial sector with annual revenues ranging from $9 billion to $37 billion.
The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors and devotes substantial time and attention throughout the year to executive compensation matters, to align compensation with shareholder interests and to further corporate goals and strategy. The independent directors need discretion and flexibility to be able to perform this role effectively. This proposal would put an undue constraint on the independent directors’ ability to exercise judgment and would place Goodyear at a competitive disadvantage in the recruitment and retention of key executives.
Your Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST the adoption of Shareholder Proposal #2 (Proxy Item 4).
Shareholder Proposal #3
(Item 5 on your Proxy)
The proposal set forth below has been submitted by a shareholder.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Policy Proposal
BE IT RESOLVED:  That the shareholders of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Company”) hereby urge that the Board of Director’s executive compensation committee establish a policy limiting the benefits provided under the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP Policy”). The SERP Policy should provide for the following: (1) a limitation of covered compensation to a senior executive’s annual salary, and (2) the exclusion of all incentive or bonus pay from inclusion in the plan’s definition of covered compensation used to establish benefits. The SERP Policy should be implemented in a manner so as not to interfere with existing contractual rights of any supplemental plan participant.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT:  We believe that one of the most troubling aspects of the sharp rise in executive compensation is the excessive pension benefits provided to senior corporate executives through the use of supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERPs”). Our Company has established a SERP, the Excess Benefit Plan. The Excess Benefit Plan provides the Company’s chief executive officer (“CEO”) and other senior executives retirement benefits far greater than those permitted under the Company’s tax-qualified pension plan. Our proposal seeks to limit excessive pension benefits by limiting the type of compensation used to calculate pension benefits under the SERP plan(s).
At present, U.S. tax law maintains a $220,000 limit on the level of compensation used to determine a participant’s retirement benefit under a tax-qualified pension plan. Our Company has established a SERP as a complement to its tax-qualified plan in order to provide senior executives increased retirement benefits. This is accomplished by raising the level of compensation used in the pension formula to calculate retirement benefits. The SERP establishes a higher compensation level on which to calculate senior executives’ pension benefits by including the executive’s full salary and annual bonus in the compensation figure. The Company’s 2006 proxy statement indicates that the combined salary and bonus figure was $4,083,333 for the CEO, approximately 18 times the $220,000 compensation limit in the Company’s tax-qualified pension plan.
Our position is that the inclusion of an executive’s annual bonus along with his or her full salary in the pension calculation is overly generous and unjustifiable. The only type of compensation used in the SERP for establishing the level of additional pension benefits should be an executive’s annual salary. No variable incentive pay should be included in a senior executive’s pension calculation under the SERP. The inclusion of annual bonus or incentive payments in determining increased pension benefits can dramatically increase the pension benefit afforded senior executives and has the additional undesirable effect of converting one-time incentive compensation into guaranteed lifetime pension income.


12


The proposal’s limitation on the type of compensation that can be considered in determining senior executives’ retirement benefits to only the executive’s salary is a necessary and reasonable restriction on the excessiveness of supplemental retirement benefits. We urge your support for this important executive compensation reform.
STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OPPOSING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL #3
ITEM 5
Your Board of Directors recommends a voteagainstthis shareholder proposal for the following reasons:
Supplemental executive retirement plans, or SERPs, are an important part of executive compensation and are utilized by most large companies, many of which compete with the Company for executive talent. Over 300 of the companies in the Fortune 500 have SERPs as part of their compensation programs. Retirement benefits, including those provided through a SERP, are a critical component of an executive’s overall compensation program and are essential to attracting, motivating and retaining talented executives with a history of leadership. Also, retirement benefits are an important factor in an executive’s decision to accept or reject a new position. For example, when an executive is recruited to Goodyear, he or she is not able to apply their years of service at their former employer to the Company’s Salaried Pension Plan. As a result, in order to attract proven executive leadership, the Compensation Committee believes that a SERP is a necessary component of a competitive retirement package.
The proposal is aimed at limiting what types of pay components may be used to calculate a benefit under the Company’s SERP. Under the Company’s SERP, the benefit is determined by using a formula based on an executive officer’s annual base salary and bonus. At least 73% of companies in the Fortune 500 with SERPs use the same components as the Company does to determine benefits. As a result, the Compensation Committee believes that adoption of the proposal would put the Company at a competitive disadvantage in attracting qualified executives. Moreover, the structure of the Company’s executive compensation program would exacerbate this competitive disadvantage. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee believes that an executive’s base salary should comprise only about 20% of an executive’s total compensation and base salaries for the Company’s executive officers are generally below median market rates. The remaining 80% of an executive’s compensation is linked to the performance of the Company. Annual bonuses are targeted to represent about 20% of total compensation and long-term compensation 60%. Limiting the SERP benefit to a formula based solely on annual base salary would not only represent a departure from market practice, but would also penalize companies, like Goodyear, where annual base salaries are below median market rates. Finally, the components used to calculate benefits under the SERP (salary and bonus) are the same as the components used to calculate the benefit under the Goodyear Salaried Pension Plan, in which substantially all of the Company’s U.S. salaried workforce participates.
The Company fully discloses its executive compensation plans and practices, and the Company’s SERP has been filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report onForm 10-K. For more information on the operation of the Company’s SERP and Salaried Pension Plan, please see “Pension Benefits” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors and devotes substantial time and attention throughout the year to executive compensation matters to align compensation with shareholder interests and to further corporate goals and strategy. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee benchmarks the Company’s compensation program against a peer group to ensure that executive compensation and benefits are competitive with the marketplace. We believe that our SERP and other executive retirement benefits are consistent with market practice. This proposal would put an undue constraint on the independent directors’ ability to implement and administer what they believe to be an important component of an executive’s overall compensation and would place Goodyear at a competitive disadvantage in the recruitment and retention of key executives.
Your Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST the adoption of Shareholder Proposal #3 (Proxy Item 5).2010.
 
OTHER BUSINESS
 
Your Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other business before the Annual Meeting and is not aware of any other business intended to be presented by any other person.
 
After the conclusion of the matters described above, shareholders will have an opportunity to ask appropriate questions regarding Goodyear and its operations.


13


If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, your proxy will be voted by Messrs. Kramer,Wells, Harvie andor Bell in such manner as they, in their discretion, deem appropriate.


11


 
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK
 
The firmspersons identified in the table below have reported that they beneficially owned at December 31, 20062008 more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock as follows:
 
         
  Shares of Common
  Percent of Common
 
Name and Address
 Stock Beneficially
  Stock Outstanding
 
of Beneficial Owner
 Owned  Beneficially Owned 
Brandes Investment Partners, L.P.        
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 500        
San Diego, California 92130  23,306,131(1)  12.9%
Impala Asset Management LLC        
134 Main Street        
New Canaan, Connecticut 06840  10,729,094(2)  5.9%
LSV Asset Management        
1 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4000        
Chicago, Illinois 60606  9,415,439(3)  5.2%
         
  Shares of Common
  Percent of Common
 
Name and Address
 Stock Beneficially
  Stock Outstanding
 
of Beneficial Owner
 Owned  Beneficially Owned 
 
FMR LLC        
Fidelity Management & Research Company        
Edward C. Johnson 3d
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
  26,197,016(1)  10.9%
         
Eton Park Fund, L.P.        
Eton Park Master Fund, Ltd.        
Eton Park Associates, L.P.        
Eton Park Capital Management, L.P.        
Eric M. Mindich
399 Park Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10022
  19,000,000(2)  7.9%
 
Notes:
 
(1)(1) SharedSole voting power in respect of 1,918,603 shares and sole dispositive power in respect of 23,306,131 shares and shared voting power in respect of 17,947,23026,197,016 shares, as stated in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007.17, 2009.
 
(2)(2) Shared voting and dispositive power in respect of 10,729,09419,000,000 shares, as stated in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007.
(3) Sole voting and dispositive power in respect of 9,415,439 shares, as stated in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2007.13, 2009.
 
In addition, The Northern Trust Company, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60675, has indicated that at the record date it held 22,115,38610,996,827 shares, or approximately 12.2%4.6% of the outstanding shares, of Common Stock including 9,538,740 shares, or approximately 5.3% of the outstanding shares, of Common Stock held as the trustee of various employee savings plans sponsored by Goodyear and certain subsidiaries.


12


On January 31, 2007,February 13, 2009, each director and nominee, each person named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 25,30, and all directors and executive officers as a group, beneficially owned the number of shares of Common Stock set forth in the Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Management table below.


14


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT
 
                                        
 Beneficial Ownership at January 31, 2007 (1)      Beneficial Ownership at February 13, 2009(1)     
   Shares of
 Shares of Common
        Shares of
 Shares of Common
 Deferred Share
   
 Shares of
 Common Stock
 Stock Subject to
      Shares of
 Common Stock
 Stock Subject to
 Equivalent Units
   
 Common Stock
 Held in Savings
 Exercisable
 Deferred Share
 Percent of
  Common Stock
 Held in Savings
 Exercisable
 and Restricted
 Percent of
 
Name
 Owned Directly (2) Plan (3) Options (4) Equivalent Units Class  Owned Directly(2) Plan(3) Options(4) Stock Units Class 
James C. Boland  3,000   -0-   -0-   23,266(11)  *   3,000   -0-   -0-   35,383(9)  *
John G. Breen  200(5)  -0-   -0-   53,675(11)  * 
Gary D. Forsee  1,000   -0-   -0-   34,929(11)  * 
Joseph M. Gingo  19,344(6)  1,340   102,649   2,707(12)  * 
C. Thomas Harvie  36,629   1,668   201,532   -0-   * 
William J. Hudson, Jr.   5,000   -0-   -0-   42,346(11)  * 
Robert J. Keegan  186,015(7)  673   818,157   -0-   * 
Richard J. Kramer  40,991(8)  324   134,953   455(12)  * 
James A. Firestone  -0-   -0-   -0-   7,468(9)  *
W. Alan McCollough  -0-   -0-   -0-   10,278(9)  *
Steven A. Minter  4,580   -0-   -0-   36,633(11)  *   4,580   -0-   -0-   49,496(9)  *
Denise M. Morrison  1,100   -0-   -0-   9,237(11)  *   -0-   -0-   -0-   19,913(9)  *
Rodney O’Neal  -0-   -0-   -0-   15,251(11)  *   -0-   -0-   -0-   25,927(9)  *
Shirley D. Peterson  -0-   -0-   -0-   13,348(11)  *   1,000   -0-   -0-   24,025(9)  *
Jonathan D. Rich  40,589(9)  5,967   102,738   49,936(12)  * 
Stephanie A. Streeter  -0-   -0-   -0-   3,410(9)  *
G. Craig Sullivan  5,000   -0-   -0-   2,293(11)  *   5,000   -0-   -0-   16,233(9)  *
Thomas H. Weidemeyer  1,000   -0-   -0-   10,551(11)  *   1,000   -0-   -0-   21,227(9)  *
Michael R. Wessel  -0-   -0-   -0-   5,497(11)  *   -0-   -0-   -0-   16,173(9)  *
All directors, the Named Officers and all other executive officers as a group (30 persons)  498,638(10)  28,319   2,282,826   344,631   1.5 
Robert J. Keegan  329,124(5)  469   988,630   -0-   *
Darren R. Wells  10,408   166   70,846   -0-   *
Richard J. Kramer  162,965(6)  226   179,121   454(10)  *
C. Thomas Harvie  65,226   1,163   158,369   -0-   *
Arthur de Bok  62,835(7)  -0-   113,430   -0-   *
W. Mark Schmitz  -0-   -0-   -0-   10,723(10)  *
All directors, the named executive officers and all other executive officers as a group (30 persons)  921,138(8)  6,359   1,980,928   255,769   1.2%
* Less than 1%
 
Notes:
*Less than 1%
 
 (1) The number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by each of the directors and named executive officers, and the 2,809,783 shares of Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by all directors and executive officers as a group, and the percentage of Common Stock outstanding beneficially owned by each person and the group, has been determined in accordance withRule 13d-3(d)(1) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 (2) Unless otherwise indicated in a subsequent note, each person named and each member of the group has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock shown.
 
 (3) Shares held in trust under Goodyear’s Employee Savings Plan for Salaried Employees.Employees (the “Savings Plan”).
 
 (4) Shares which may be acquired upon the exercise of options which are exercisable on or prior to April 1, 2007.14, 2009.
 
 (5)Shares acquired by Mr. Breen pursuant to Goodyear’s 1994 Restricted Stock Award Plan for Non-employee Directors, which shares are subject to certain restrictions.
(6) Includes 2,284 shares owned by his spouse.
(7) Includes 13,000 shares owned by his spouse.
 
 (8)(6) Includes 10,000103,492 shares acquired under Restricted Stock Purchase Agreements, which shares are subject to the Company’s repurchase option and certain restrictions on transfer.
(7) Includes 59,835 shares acquired under a Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement, which shares are subject to the Company’s repurchase option and certain restrictions on transfer.
 
 (9)(8) Includes 1,000 shares owned jointly by Mr. Rich and his spouse.
(10) Includes 479,289908,138 shares owned of record and beneficially or owned beneficially through a nominee, and 19,34913,000 shares held by or jointly with family members of certain directors and executive officers.
 
 (11)(9) Deferred share equivalent units and restricted stock units, each equivalent to a hypothetical share of Common Stock, accrued to accounts of the director under Goodyear’s Outside Directors’ Equity Participation Plan,Plan. Deferred share equivalent units are payable in cash, and restricted stock units are payable in Common Stock, following retirement from the Board of Directors. See “Director Compensation” at page 44.50.
 (12)(10) Units, each equivalent to a hypothetical share of Common Stock, deferred pursuant to performance awards earned, and receivablepayable in cash, shares of Common Stock, or any combination thereof, at the election of the executive officer.


1513


 
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
 
Compensation Philosophy
 
The key objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
 
 • attract and retain qualified and experienced executive officers and other key personnel,
• motivate executives and other key personnel to attain appropriate short-term and long-term performance goals and manage the companyCompany for sustained long-term growth, and
 
 • align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.stockholders, and
• attract and retain qualified and experienced executive officers and other key personnel.
 
To help us achieve these objectives, we strive to offer our executive officers compensation and benefits that are tied to our performance, including equity-based compensation, and that are attractive and competitive for talent in the marketplace for talent.marketplace. The key components of compensation provided to our executive officers are:
 
 • annual salaries,
 
 • annual cash bonusesincentives based on performance measured against specific corporateand/or operating unit goals and individual performance,
 
 • long-term compensation in the form ofof:
 
 • stock options tied to the growth in the Company’sour stock price from the date of grant,
 
 • performance shares, the payout of which is tied to the achievement of specific financial objectives during a three-year performance period and the growth in the Company’sour stock price, and
 
 • cash awards under a long-term incentive plan, the payout of which is tied to achieving the same financial objectives used to determine performance share awards, and
 
 • retirement benefits and perquisites.
The following table provides an overview of the relationship between the objectives and components of our compensation program. A more detailed discussion of each component is provided later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
ComponentDescriptionParticipantsObjectives Achieved
 
 
Annual Compensation
Base Salary•   Annual cash compensationperquisites.•   All employees•   Provide a minimum level of fixed compensation necessary to attract and retain employees

•   Recognize skills, competencies, experience and individual contribution
Performance Recognition Plan — Annual Cash Incentive•   Annual cash incentive based on corporate and/or operating unit performance. Payments can be higher or lower than target based on individual performance.•   Key employees (including all named executive officers)•   Drive and differentiate for short-term performance:

   •   Across total company and operating units as measured primarily by the achievement of annual operating goals

   •   Of the individual as measured by achievement of specific strategic goals and demonstrated leadership


14


ComponentDescriptionParticipantsObjectives Achieved
Long-Term Compensation
Stock Options•   Long-term equity incentive program that provides the opportunity to purchase stock at a fixed price over a ten-year period. Results in value only if stock price increases.•   Key employees (including all named executive officers)•   Drive stock price performance

•   Focus on long-term success

•   Facilitate retention

•   Align the interests of management with those of shareholders
Performance Share Grants•   Long-term cash and equity incentive program with award payouts tied to achievement of three-year corporate goals and stock performance; paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Common Stock.•   Key employees (including all named executive officers)•   Drive operational performance and shareholder value creation

•   Focus on long-term success

•   Facilitate retention

•   Align the interests of management with those of shareholders
Executive Performance Plan•   Long-term cash incentive program with award payouts tied to achievement of three-year corporate goals; paid in cash.•   Senior executives (including all named executive officers)•   Drive operational performance

•   Focus on long-term success

•   Facilitate retention

•   Align the interests of management with those of shareholders
Retirement Programs
Supplementary Pension Plan and Excess Benefit Plan•   Additional pension benefits•   Senior executives (including named executive officers)•   Facilitate retention

•   Support succession planning objectives by ensuring sufficiency of retirement replacement income
Qualified Retirement Plans•   Post-retirement benefits•   All U.S. employees•   Necessary to attract and retain employees
Other Executive Benefits
Perquisites•   Home security systems

•   Tire program

•   Financial planning and tax preparation services

•   Annual physical exams

•   Use of company aircraft (in limited circumstances, and with executive partially reimbursing the Company)
•   Specific benefits are offered to different executive officers based on business purpose•   Assure protection of executive officers

•   Enable executives to focus on Company business with minimal disruption
Other Benefits•   Medical, welfare and other benefits•   All employees•   Necessary to attract and retain employees

15


Over the past two years, the market value of our common stock has risen and made stock-based compensation a more viable alternative than in prior years. As a result, our mix of compensation has evolved and reflects a greater emphasis on grants of performance shares and a corresponding decrease in long-term cash-based incentives and stock options. Consistent with general market practice, the Compensation Committee believes that base salary should comprise approximately 20% of the aggregate compensation represented by salary, annual cash bonus, and long-term compensation (such elements referred to collectively herein as “primary compensation”). The remaining approximately 80% of primary compensation is a mix of annual cash bonus, stock options, performance shares (paid half in cash and half in stock), and long-term cash-based incentive awards.
We generally target base salaries below median market rates, as required by our master labor agreement (the “USW Agreement”) with the United Steelworkers (the “USW”), and we target performance-based and equity compensation at rates that are either at the median market rate or somewhat above such rate. We generally emphasize compensation that can vary based on annual, long-term and stock price performance, over fixed compensation elements. As a result, the total amount of primary compensation is targeted either at median market rate or somewhat above such rate for comparable companies. This approach provides an opportunity for compensation in excess of market median rates through superior performance. At the same time, executives can earn less than market median rates for performance that is less than acceptableand/or due to declines in our stock price.
We are guided by the following core principles in establishing compensation for our executives, including the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and President (“CEO”) and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table (the(together with the CEO, the “named executive officers”):
 
First, compensation programs should motivate our executives to take actions that are best foraligned with our short-and long-term performance while delivering positive annual results.strategic objectives, and appropriately balance risk versus potential reward.
 
Second, as executives move to a greater level of responsibility, the percentage of their pay based on performance should increase.increase to ensure the highest level of accountability to shareholders.
 
Third, performance pay should offer an opportunity for above average compensation for above average performance balanced by the risk of below average compensation when our performance does not meet our goals.


16


 
Fourth, the percentage of total compensation paid in the form of equity should also increase as executives have increasing responsibility for corporate performance, thereby more completelyclosely aligning their interests directly with those of our stockholders.
We generally target base salaries for our named executive officers below median market rates, as required by our master labor agreement (the “USW Agreement”) with the USW, and we target performance-based and equity compensation at rates that are either at the median market rate or somewhat above such rate. This approach minimizes fixed expense associated with salary and enables annual cash compensation and total compensation to fluctuate directly with performance against operating goals and changes in share price, thereby ensuring that overall costs are aligned with performance and that executives receive a leveraged and attractive compensation opportunity that varies based on results. This approach also provides an opportunity for compensation in excess of market median rates through superior performance. Conversely, executives may earn less than market median rates for performance that does not meet our goalsand/or due to declines in our stock price.
Consistent with general market practice, the Compensation Committee believes that base salary should comprise approximately 20% of “primary compensation,” which we define to include salary, annual cash incentive and long-term compensation. The remaining approximately 80% of primary compensation is a mix of annual cash incentive, stock options, performance shares (currently paid half in cash and half in stock), and long-term cash-based incentive awards. The design and mix of variable compensation has been evolving over the past several years. The market value of our Common Stock, which has declined and experienced significant volatility during 2008, and the availability of shares under our equity compensation plans will impact our ability to use stock-based compensation to deliver a specified level of targeted compensation opportunity.
 
Compensation Decision-Making
 
Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has delegated to the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) primary responsibility for establishing and administering our compensation programs for executive officers and other key personnel. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation and benefit plans and policies, administers our stock plans (including reviewing and recommending equity grants to executive officers), and reviews and approves annually all compensation decisions relating to executive officers, including those for the CEO and the other named executive officers.
 
In performing its duties, the Compensation Committee meets periodically with the CEO to review compensation policies and specific levels of compensation paid to executive officers and other key personnel, and reports and makes recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation policies and programs. In addition, the CEO annually makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding salary adjustments and the setting of annual incentive targets and awards and long-term compensation targets and awards for executive officers, including the other named executive officers. In determining the compensation of a named executive officer, the Compensation Committee considers our performance and relative shareholder return, the compensation of officers with similar responsibilities at comparable companies, the awards given to the named executive officer in past years, the relationship between the compensation to be received by the officer and the compensation to be received by the other named executive officers, including comparing the relationship to that found at comparable companies, and such other factors that the Committee deems relevant that are discussed elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Compensation Committee informs the other independentnon-management directors of the Board regarding its decisions regarding compensation for the CEO and the other electednamed executive officers.
 
At least annually, the Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation practices to determine whether they meet, and are consistent with, the key objectives of our compensation program. In addition, in 2006 From time to time,


16


members of our Executive Compensation group in our Corporate Human Resources Department made a comprehensive presentationmake presentations to the fullCompensation Committee and the Board on compensation matters, including compensation philosophy, elements and mix of compensation, and our various compensation programs.
 
Compensation Committee Charter
The Compensation Committee has a charter that it follows in carrying out its responsibilities. It has also developed a set of policies and guidelines that it follows in considering and making decisions. The Compensation Committee reviews its charter and its policies each year, modifying them as it believes desirable. The Compensation Committee’s charter is available to stockholders on our website at www.goodyear.com. The Compensation Committee generally adheres to the guidelines and philosophy described above under “Compensation Philosophy.” However, significant changes in our business or the markets in general, may cause the Compensation Committee to deviate from these guidelines as it deemsif deemed appropriate. This allows the Compensation Committee to meet its primary objective of attracting, motivating and retaining talentedmotivate our executives and other key personnel to attain appropriate short-term and long-term performance goals and to manage the Company for sustained long-term growth, serve the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.stockholders, and attract and retain talented executives.
 
Role of Employees and Compensation Consultant
Employees within the Executive Compensation group in our Corporate Human Resources Department support the Compensation Committee in its work. Among other things, this support includes providing reports, data and analyses with respect to current and proposed compensation, answering inquiries from members of the Compensation Committee, and preparing documentation with respect to compensation plans and programs.
The CEO meets periodically with the Compensation Committee to review compensation policy and specific levels of compensation paid to executive officers and other key personnel. In addition, the CEO annually makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding salary adjustments and the setting of annual bonus targets and long-term compensation awards for executive officers, including the other named executive officers.
 
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate outside advisors, including compensation consultants, to assist it in evaluating actual and proposed compensation for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to approve any such consultant’s fees and the other terms of such retention. From time to time,During 2008, the Compensation Committee solicits advice from an outsideretained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., as its independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin,to provide advice and assistance on executive compensation matters, relatingincluding the 2008 compensation decisions that are discussed elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. As part of its engagement, Frederic W. Cook & Co. reviewed our executive compensation peer group and conducted a competitive analysis of the primary compensation opportunities for the named executive officers as well as our operational and stock price performance relative to the CEOpeer group. Frederick W. Cook & Co. also conducted a comprehensive review of the design of our primary compensation programs, including our variable incentive plans and other executive officers. This advice has consisted primarilycompensation plans, and provided recommendations for changes where appropriate. Frederic W. Cook & Co. also reviewed our non-qualified deferred compensation plans in connection with amendments made to those plans in order to comply with Section 409A of assistancethe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), our CEO’s employment agreement in connection with benchmarkingits renewal and our non-employee director compensation for senior executives and directors, and advice on current and evolving market practices inprogram. Frederic W. Cook & Co. works with Goodyear only under the areas of perquisites, change in control benefits, and retiree medical benefits. In 2006, we paid Towers Perrin approximately $100,000 for these services provided to the Compensation Committee. Towers Perrin did not attend any meetingsdirection of the Compensation Committee in 2006, butand did meet with the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.


17


Towers Perrin providesnot provide any other advice andor consulting services to us from time to time, consisting mainly of consulting services regarding expensing methodologies under Statement of Financial Standards No. 123(R) (“SFAS 123(R)”). In 2006 we paid Towers Perrin approximately $18,000 in respect of such services, which services were provided in 2005. Towers Perrin did not provide any such services to us in 2006.2008.
 
Benchmarking of Primary Compensation
 
As noted above, the Compensation Committee generally targets primary compensation levels for named executive officers at median market rates. For these purposes, the Compensation Committee has determined “market” rates by considering threetwo sources:
 
 • a groupproxy statements of companies ranked between 60th and 180th on theFortune500 rankings (in the most recent ranking, this represented a range of annual revenues from $11.9 billion to $29.3 billion, with Goodyear’s annual projected revenues representing the median of such group);
• 1816 peer companies with annual revenues ranging from $9$14.4 billion to $37$58.6 billion and median revenues of $14$22.4 billion; and
 
 • compensation surveys published from time to time by five national human resources consulting firms.
 
The 18-memberFor 2008 compensation decisions, the peer group noted above consistsconsisted of: United Technologies,3M, Caterpillar, Johnson Controls, Honeywell, 3M, Deere & Co, Visteon, Lear,Co., DuPont, Eaton, Emerson Electric, Whirlpool,Honeywell, Illinois Tool Works, Johnson Controls, Lear, Paccar, Dana, Delphi, Textron, Inc., Eaton, PPG Industries, Textron, TRW Automotive, United Technologies and Arvinmeritor.Whirlpool. This peer group has beenwas used because its membership reflects alignment with the nature of our business, workforce and global complexity. The Compensation Committee intends to review the composition of this peer group does not include other companies in 2007 with a view toward considering the inclusion of consumer productstire industry because no otherU.S.-based tire company is similar in size and complexity to us andnon-U.S.-based tire companies as Goodyear continues to execute on its strategy of positioning itself as a market-driven, consumer-focused company rather than a typical auto supplier.do not publish comparable compensation information. The Compensation Committee may alsocontinue to make changes in the peer group from time to time based on the criteria described above or other relevant factors.
 
Data with respect to comparable elements of primary compensation is compiled for the groupspeer group of companies described above from available sources, including, in most cases, the most recently available annual proxy statements containing executive compensation data.
 
Tax Deductibility of Pay
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) provides that compensation paid to a public company’s chief executive officer and its four other highest paid executive officers in excess of $1 million is not deductible unless certain procedural requirements have been satisfied. The Compensation Committee believes that awards under our 2002 and 2005 Performance Plans qualify for full deductibility under Section 162(m).
Although compensation paid under two of our plans, the Executive Performance Plan and the Performance Recognition Plan is performance-based, it does not qualify for the deductibility exception for performance-based compensation and is subject to the Section 162(m) limitation on deductibility. As discussed in greater detail below, in light of our financial condition and capital structure in recent years, the Compensation Committee believes it is in our best interests and our stockholders’ best interests to retain flexibility in awarding incentive compensation under the Executive Performance Plan and the Performance Recognition Plan that does not qualify for the exception for performance-based compensation. The Compensation Committee will continue to review and evaluate, as necessary, the impact of Section 162(m) on our executive compensation programs.
Stockholding Guidelines
To better link the interests of management and stockholders, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted stockholding guidelines for our executive officers effective January 1, 2006. These guidelines specify a number of shares that our executive officers must accumulate and hold within five years of the later of the effective date of the program or the date of appointment as an officer. The specific share requirements are based on a multiple of annual base salary ranging from one to five times, with the higher multiples applicable to executive officers having the highest levels of responsibility. Amounts invested in the Goodyear stock fund of the Goodyear Employee Savings Plan, share equivalent units in the company’s deferred compensation plan, restricted stock, and stock owned outright by executive officers (or their spouses) are counted as ownership in assessing compliance with the guidelines. Unexercised stock options and unearned performance shares are not counted toward compliance with the guidelines. We do not have any policies or strategies to hedge any economic risk associated with these stockholding guidelines.


18


Elements of Compensation
In addition to primary compensation (base salary, annual cash bonuses, stock option, performance shares, and cash-based long-term incentive awards), we provide executive officers with certain other compensation and benefits. These other arrangements include pension and post-termination benefits, deferred compensation arrangements, and a limited amount of perquisites, as well as other employee benefits generally available to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis. Each of these elements is described in more detail in the sections that follow. For more information regarding the Committee’s 2006 compensation decisions please see “2006 Salary Decisions,” “2006 Bonus Payouts Under Performance Recognition Plan,” “2006 Grants and Payouts under the Executive Performance Plan,” “2006 Performance Share Grants,” and “2006 Stock Option Grants” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
 
Annual Compensation
 
Base Salaries
 
We provide base salaries to recognize the skills, competencies, experience and individual performance each named executive officer brings to his position. We target base salaries below median market rates, as required by the USW Agreement, and place correspondingly greater emphasis on performance-based incentive and equity compensation. Salary guidelines for each named executive officer’s position are based primarily on market data


17


that we derive through our benchmarking practices, as described above. We also develop salary guidelines from compensation surveys using regression analysis based on revenues of the surveyed companies. In addition to data derived from suchthese surveys, the Compensation Committee reviews general surveys prepared by national human resource consulting firms indicating past, present and projected salary structures and annual increases for executive positions. The Compensation Committee also considers the CEO’s recommendations (other than with respect to his base salary), which are based in substantial part on the guidelines described above as well as on certain subjective factors, including the CEO’s evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer against corporate, operating unit and individual objectives established at the start of each year, their current and future responsibilities, our recent financial performance, retention considerations, and general economic and competitive conditions.
 
2008 Base Salary Decisions
Using the methodologies described above for setting salary guidelines, in December 2007 we compared total compensation levels for our named executive officers and 16 additional executives against survey data provided by Frederic W. Cook & Co. We concluded that the base salaries of our named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO were, in the aggregate, below the market median, in accordance with the USW Agreement.
In 2008, the overall increase in base salaries for all executive officers, excluding the CEO and executive officers who received significant promotions, was 3.3%. Base salary increases were determined in February 2008. Mr. Keegan, Mr. Kramer, Mr. Harvie and Mr. de Bok received increases of 3.4%, 3.6%, 6.3% and 13.6%, respectively. Mr. Wells was elected as our Chief Financial Officer effective October 17, 2008 at an annual base salary of $450,000. Mr. de Bok received a greater increase in his base salary due to his increased responsibilities following his appointment as President of our new Europe, Middle East and Africa business unit, which was formed in the first quarter of 2008 by combining our former European Union and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa business units. Mr. Schmitz received a base salary of $407,549 for the portion of the year he was our Chief Financial Officer. Salaries of the current named executive officers in 2008 were an average of 5% lower than the median indicated by the salary guidelines described above. Since no annual incentives were paid with respect to 2008, salaries in 2008 represented all of the total annual cash compensation paid to the named executive officers. Due to the current economic environment, we do not anticipate providing any base salary increases to our named executive officers in 2009.
Annual Cash BonusesIncentives — Performance Recognition Plan
 
The Performance Recognition Plan provides annual cash-based incentives for approximately 700730 participants, including all named executive officers. Awards under the Performance Recognition Plan are designed to emphasize important short-term operating and tactical objectives that executives can influencedirectly drive the creation of shareholder value and which help createprovide appropriate balance with the metrics used in our long-term value as well as providing balance to the long-term elements of our compensation program.incentives. Awards generally have the following characteristics:
 
 • an individual’s target bonusincentive level for the award is set annually as a percentage of base salary, at rates slightly above market median levels to make up forso that when combined with the shortfall in targetedbelow median base salaries and torequired by the USW Agreement, we provide the opportunity to earnan overall annual compensation atopportunity aligned with market median levels;
 
 • the level of funding of the annual bonusincentive pool is based on the level of achievement of two financial performance criteria (linked to overall companyand/or operating unit results), adjusted for extraordinary items and other relevant factors as recommended by the CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee;Committee, each of which is described in more detail below;
 
 • the amount of individual payouts for executives can range from 0% to 200% of the executive’s target bonus,incentive, based on the executive’s performance during the year against individual objectives; and
 
 • the total payout for all participants may not exceed the bonusincentive pool.
Annual bonus target levels for each position, as a percentage of annual salary, are based primarily on market data which we derive by benchmarking against a subset ofFortune500 companies and a smaller peer group, as described above. In addition to data derived from such studies, the Compensation Committee reviews general surveys prepared by national human resource consulting firms indicating past, present and projected bonus structures for executive positions. The Compensation Committee also considers the CEO’s recommendations, which are based on substantially the same considerations described above under “Base Salaries”.
 
Each financial performance criteriacriterion has a target level as well as a minimum and maximum level, which are determined based on the perceived difficulty of the established targets and actual results for those financial measures in prior years. For corporate officers, funding of the bonusincentive pool available for payouts is based on overall company results with respect to the two financial performance criteria. Funding of the bonusincentive pool for officers of our sixfour operating units is based 60% on that operating unit’s results and 40% on overall company results. In this


19


manner, we believe our executives are held most accountable for financial results in the areas where they have the most control and influence.influence, but are also motivated to work cooperatively with other operating units to maximize results for the entire Company.


18


In determining the funding of the bonusincentive pool available for payouts, the Compensation Committee first compares actual results with the target performance level for the two financial performance criteria. This comparison is done for the companyCompany overall, and for each operating unit. These results are referred to as the “actual results.” Then, the Committee considers and takes into account the following three factors to determine whether the actual results should be adjusted:
 
 • non-recurring restructuring charges are considered for exclusion, consistent with past practice, because the Compensation Committee believes senior managers should be encouraged to make decisions with long-term benefits to the Company without being concerned about the impact on their incentive compensation;
 
 • the effects of significant one-time, unanticipated, non-operating or extraordinary events are considered for exclusion, consistent with past practice, because the effect of such events would generally not have been reflected in the performance targets; and
 
 • qualitative factors that might call for adjustment of the actual results are considered upon the recommendation of the CEO based on his overall assessment of our business and performance.
 
The size of the overall bonus pool thus depends on the actual results and the extent to which the company-wide and operating unit performance criteria are achieved, as adjusted to reflect the factors described above. In 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005, the Compensation Committee established bonus payment pools of 46%, 72%, 188%, and 162%, respectively, of the aggregate target bonus level for such years.
After the size of the bonusincentive pool has been determined as described above, the amount of the payout for each named executive officer is determined. In this process, the officer’s target bonusincentive amount is first multiplied by the same fractionpercentage used to determine the aggregate bonus amount to fund the bonusincentive pool applicable to such officer. (For example, if the bonusincentive pool applicable to such officer is funded at 150% of the aggregate target bonusincentive amount, the officer’s individual payout initially would initially be set at 150% of his individual bonusincentive target.) Then, the CEO assesses the officer’s individual performance and contributions towards companyCompany goals and makes his recommendations with respect to individual payout amounts to the Compensation Committee, which reviewsconsiders the CEO’s recommendations and approvesdetermines the final payouts. The Compensation Committee undertakes the same process for the CEO and makes the determination as to the final payout amount for the CEO. Participants can earn between 0% and 200% of their target bonus,incentive, but the total payout for all participants may not exceed the aggregate bonusincentive pool.
 
To illustrate how the Performance Recognition Plan works, assume an award with a target level of $50,000. If the company-wide and operating unit performance criteria are attained in an amount equal to 150% of their target amounts, the amount contributed to the overall bonusincentive pool in respect of this award is $75,000 (i.e., 150% of $50,000). However, the individual having this award would be eligible to receive a payout between $0 and $100,000 (i.e., up to 200% of the target level), depending on the individual’s own performance and contribution to companyCompany goals.
 
Awards are generally paid in cash. However, named executive officers may elect to defer all or a portion of their award in the form of cash or stock units. If deferred in the form of stock units, we will match 20% of the deferred amount with additional stock units. Theunits that will vest in one year subject to the executives’ continued employment. Any stock units are converted to shares of Goodyear common stockCommon Stock and paid to the participant on the first business dayin January of the thirdfourth year following the end of the plan year under which the award was earned. See “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan” below.
 
Future awards under the Performance Recognition Plan may utilize different or additional financial performance criteria, as well as other quantifiable performance measures that are tied to the achievement of important strategic objectives that drive the success of our business.
2008 Payouts Under Performance Recognition Plan
In 2008, the performance criteria used for incentive awards under the Performance Recognition Plan were as follows:
• for corporate officers (including Messrs. Keegan, Wells and Harvie): (i) Goodyear’s net sales, less cost of goods sold, selling, administrative and general expense, and finance charges (“adjusted EBIT”) and (ii) Goodyear’s “operating cash flow” (cash flow from operations and investing activities, each adjusted for foreign currency exchange, less the change in restricted cash and dividends paid to minority interests in subsidiaries), both equally weighted at 50% and independent of each other; and
• for officers of our four operating units (including Messrs. Kramer and de Bok): (i) the operating unit’s net sales, less cost of goods sold and selling, administrative and general expense (“EBIT”) and (ii) the operating unit’s operating cash flow (as defined above), both equally weighted at 50% and independent of each other.
Adjusted EBIT is derived from our audited financial statements by reducing net sales for cost of goods sold, selling, administrative and general expense, and finance charges, and EBIT is derived from our audited financial


19


statements by reducing net sales for cost of goods sold and selling, administrative and general expense. The Compensation Committee used adjusted EBIT to measure overall company results, rather than EBIT, to provide our officers an incentive to reduce finance charges, given existing debt levels.
The Compensation Committee established the performance targets for the Performance Recognition Plan in February 2008. The Compensation Committee set the corporate adjusted EBIT target taking into account increased performance expectations for each operating unit. The North American Tire and Europe, Middle East and Africa Tire (“EMEA”) EBIT targets also reflected increased performance expectations during 2008. The corporate and North American Tire operating cash flow targets were established taking into account the Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association funding obligations. Consistent with past practices, the Compensation Committee also excluded accelerated depreciation expense related to plant closures from the corporate adjusted EBIT target. Overall, the Compensation Committee believed the financial targets reflected a significant stretch for the Company given the dynamic and increasingly competitive business environment, the challenging economic environment, rapidly increasing costs of raw materials, and the incremental growth required from 2007 actual results.
In February 2009, the Compensation Committee reviewed actual results for 2008 with respect to achievement of the company-wide and operating unit financial performance criteria.
For overall company results (the performance of which is relevant for determining incentive amounts for Messrs. Keegan, Wells and Harvie), target adjusted EBIT was $880 million and actual adjusted EBIT (adjusted as described above) was $472 million, or approximately 46% below target, and target operating cash flow was ($50) million and actual operating cash flow (adjusted as described above) was ($834) million, significantly below target.
As noted above, funding of the incentive pool for officers of our four operating units is based 60% on that operating unit’s results and 40% on overall company results. The North American Tire unit (the performance of which is relevant for determining Mr. Kramer’s incentive payment) fell short of its minimum EBIT and operating cash flow targets. The EMEA unit (the performance of which is relevant for determining Mr. de Bok’s incentive payment) also fell short of its minimum EBIT and operating cash flow targets.
We experienced difficult industry conditions during 2008 as the global economic slowdown increased both in severity and geographic scope throughout the course of the year. These industry conditions were characterized by dramatically lower motor vehicle sales and production, weakness in the demand for replacement tires, and recessionary economic conditions in many parts of the world. As a result of these factors, we did not meet the challenging performance targets established in February 2008 for incentive awards under the Performance Recognition Plan. In light of the global economic slowdown, its impact on our business and our performance against our targets, we determined not to fund the 2008 corporate, North American Tire or EMEA incentive pools for our named executive officers.
The table below presents information regarding the potential and actual awards for our named executive officers under the Performance Recognition Plan:
                         
  Target Payout
  Payout Range
           Actual Award
 
  as a % of
  as a % of
  Target Award
  Maximum Award
  Actual Award
  as a % of
 
Name
 Salary  Salary  ($)  ($)  ($)  Salary 
 
Keegan  152%  0%-304%  $1,850,000  $3,700,000  $0   0%
Wells  66%  0%-132%   229,071   458,142   0   0%
Kramer  91%  0%-182%   520,000   1,040,000   0   0%
Harvie  70%  0%-140%   350,000   700,000   0   0%
de Bok  74%  0%-148%   366,188   732,376   0   0%
Schmitz(1)                  
(1)Mr. Schmitz was no longer our Chief Financial Officer at December 31, 2008. As a result, he was not eligible to receive an award under the Performance Recognition Plan for 2008.
Long-Term Compensation
 
A significant portion of primary compensation for each named executive officer is comprised of long-term compensation, which encompassesLong-term incentives are delivered through grants of stock options and performance shares under our 20022005 and 20052008 Performance Plans (collectively, the “Performance Plans”) and long-term cash-based incentive awards under our Executive Performance Plan. Long-term performance-based compensation is generally designed to represent approximately 60% of the annual primary compensation of named executive officers, assuming achievement of target performance levels.


20


This is consistent with our emphasis on long-term compensation, which better ties the executive’s compensation to changes over time in the price of our common stock.long-term operational success and shareholder value creation. The mix of long-term compensation between stock option grants, performance share grants, and cash-based long-term incentives was based, in part, on the number of shares available for grant under the Performance Plans, as well as considerations relating to managing the dilutive effect of share-based awards.
 
The amount and terms of grants to named executive officers under the Performance Plans and the Executive Performance Plan are based on criteria established by the Compensation Committee and typically include


20


responsibility level, base salary level, current Common Stock market price, officer performance, recent Goodyear performance, internal pay equity, and, with respect to the Performance Plans, the number of shares available under the plan. As discussed above under “Compensation Philosophy,” the Compensation Committee makes grants under these plans with the objective of providing a target primary compensation opportunity equal to theat or somewhat above median market rates.
 
Cash-Based Awards Under the Executive Performance Plan
 
The Executive Performance Plan provides long-term incentive compensation opportunities in order to attract, retain and reward key personnel and to motivate key personnel to achieve our long-term business objectives.objectives and to attract, retain and reward key personnel. This plan was originally established, in 2003, to address the limitations of providing compensation through our Performance Plans resulting fromequity compensation plans. Due to the relatively low market price of our common stockCommon Stock at the time, such as the potentially dilutive impact of stock grants in the quantity of shares that would have been necessary to provide meaningful incentive compensation (which would have required moreexceeded the number of available shares than were then available under the 2002 Performance Plan).Plan and would have created an unacceptable level of potential share dilution. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined that a cash-based plan was the most appropriate tool for providing performance and retention incentives. The market value of our Common Stock and performance incentives.the availability of shares under our equity compensation plans continue to impact our ability to use stock-based compensation to deliver a specified level of targeted compensation opportunity. As a result, the Executive Performance Plan remains a valuable compensation tool.
 
The Compensation Committee generally makes Executive Performance Plan grants at its first meeting following completion of the prior fiscal year (typically in February). Awards of units under the Executive Performance Plan generally have the following characteristics:
 
 • the target value is $100 per unit;
 
 • the payout amount is based on results over a three-year period as compared with performance goals set at the start of the three-year period; and
 
 • the payout amount can range from $0 per unit to $200 per unit based on actual results (and assuming the recipient remains continuously employed by us through the performance period).
 
The number of target units awarded annually to each named executive officer is based on a number of considerations, including market data about competitive long-term compensation and the CEO’s recommendations. In determining target awards, the CEO takes into consideration certain subjective factors, including the CEO’s evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer, our recent performance, internal pay equity, retention considerations and general economic and competitive conditions.
 
PerformanceThe performance criteria for grants made for the2004-20062006-2008,2007-2009 and2008-2010 performance periodperiods were cumulative net income and cumulative cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally. Results were based entirely on our consolidated performance, with no award tied to an executive’s business unit or individual performance. In this manner, the plan emphasizes long-term consolidated financial results, balances measurementperformance measures used under our annual bonus planthe Performance Recognition Plan and reinforces the need for teamwork among executives. Net income was used as a measure to focus on bottom line improvement. Cash flow focused on our efforts to manage the cash requirements associated with our business, including our debt, pension and OPEB obligations and our efforts to improve our capital structure.
The performance criteria for grants made for the2005-2007structure, and2006-2008 performance periods were cumulative net income and cumulative cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally. While the cash flow target focuses on our efforts to manage our cash requirements as described above, adjusting for net debt provides incentive for reduction ofto reduce our obligations, including our debt and pension obligations. As a result, theThe amount of debt that is netted out is equal to the amount of total debt on the consolidated balance sheet plus expected domestic pension funding obligations for the next three fiscal years, less cash on the consolidated balance sheet.
 
172,900 units were granted under the Executive Performance Plan for the performance period2004-2006. All of these grants included a guaranteed minimum payment of either $25 or $50 per unit. This guaranteed minimum payment feature was included as a retention tool to help keep the senior executive team together during the anticipated turnaround period for the company. 180,500 units were granted in respect of the2005-2007 performance period and 167,590 units were granted in respect of the2006-2008 performance period, 174,150 units were granted in respect of the2007-2009 performance period, and 183,720 units were granted in respect of the2008-2010 performance period.


21


2008 Grants Under the Executive Performance Plan
The Compensation Committee awarded an aggregate of 183,720 units in respect of the2008-2010 performance period under the Executive Performance Plan. The performance criteria for the 2008 grants are cumulative net income and cumulative total cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally. The performance periodstargets for the2005-20072008-2010 period generally require relatively greater improvement in performance than had been contemplated under prior years’ grants and will be achieved, at the target performance level, if we successfully execute our2006-2008three-year do not carry any guaranteed minimum payment.operating plan. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate for the2008-2010 performance targets to be consistent with our three-year operating plan which reflects the Company’s emergence from a challenging period of recovery that began in 2003. The targets are premised on the Company meaningfully growing both net income and cumulative total cash flow during the three-year performance period.
The value of the units granted for the2008-2010 performance period (assuming payout at $100 per unit) represents approximately 51% of the value of total long-term compensation awarded to the current named executive officers in 2008. Included in the grants for the2008-2010 performance period were grants of 43,890; 6,700; 12,000; 7,700; and 9,500 units to Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Kramer, Harvie and de Bok, respectively. Mr. Schmitz was granted 8,800 units for the2008-2010 performance period, but those units were forfeited upon his departure from the Company. Payment on each unit may range between $0 and $200 depending upon the attainment of the performance criteria described above.
Performance Shares
 
In 2006, in order to more closely align executive compensation to the performance of our common stockCommon Stock and to better manage concerns about stockholder dilution, and in response to new accounting rules with respect to stock options under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123(R)123R”), we introduced performance shares as a new component of long-term compensation for named executive officers and other key personnel. We believe that performance shares, like the cash-based Executive Performance Plan, drive operational performance while also driving shareholder value creation, thereby better aligning the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.
 
Performance shares are granted under the 2005 and 2008 Performance Plans and generally have the following terms:
 
 • vesting is based on results over a three-year period as compared with performance goals set at the start of the three-year period;period and continued employment; and


21


 • once vested, shares are paid 50% in cash (based on the market value of our common stockCommon Stock on the vesting date) and 50% in stock.
 
The number of performance shares awarded annually to each named executive officer, measured by the percentage of total long-term compensation represented by such shares, is based on a number of considerations, including market data aboutfor comparable long-term cash-based incentive compensation and the CEO’s recommendations, which are based in part on certain subjective factors, including the CEO’s evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer, our recent performance, share availability under our equity compensation plans, internal pay equity, retention considerations, and general economic and competitive conditions. Historically,
Performance shares granted beginning in 2009, once vested, will be paid all in stock.
2008 Performance Share Grants
In 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded an aggregate of 1,054,325 target performance shares. The vesting period for these shares is2008-2010 and the performance criteria over this period are cumulative net income and cumulative total cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally, as described above under “Cash-Based Awards Under the Executive Performance Plan.” The aggregate target value of the performance shares granted to the current named executive officer has receivedofficers in 2008 (measured at grant date fair value) was $1,669,522. This represented approximately 13% of total long-term compensation awarded to the current named executive officers in 2008. In 2008, target grants of 20,279; 7,077; 16,111; 9,910; and 10,469 performance shares equivalentfor the2008-2010 performance period were made to Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Kramer, Harvie and de Bok, respectively, having the terms described above. Mr. Schmitz received a target grant of 7,479 performance shares for the2008-2010 performance period, but those performance shares were forfeited upon his departure from the Company.


22


Payouts for the2006-2008 Performance Period Under the Executive Performance Plan and With Respect to Performance Shares
Following the sale of our Engineered Products business in valueJuly 2007, the Compensation Committee modified the cumulative net income and cumulative total cash flow, net of debt targets to approximately 10%reflect the sale of that business. The table below shows the performance goals and corresponding payout percentages for awards granted for the2006-2008 performance period.
             
  
Payout per Executive Performance Plan Unit or Performance Share
 
  50%  100%  200% 
 
Performance Measure(2006-2008):            
Cumulative net income $1,149 million  $1,195 million  $1,252 million 
% of target  96%  100%  105%
Cumulative total cash flow, net of debt $1,794 million  $1,891 million  $2,178 million 
% of target  95%  100%  115%
The Executive Performance Plan and the 2005 Performance Plan permit the Committee to make adjustments to actual company results for the performance measures for extraordinary items and other relevant factors. Over the three-year performance period, actual company results were adjusted to reflect the impact of the valueUSW strike, to exclude restructuring charges and to exclude the gain on, and the cash proceeds from, the sale of his grantour Engineered Products business. The table below shows actual adjusted results with respect to the performance measures over the2006-2008 performance period.
Performance (as
TargetActual Adjusted Results% of target)
Performance Measure(2006-2008):
Cumulative net income$1,195 million$848 million71%
Cumulative total cash flow, net of debt$1,891 million$2,349 million124%
During the performance period for the 2006 grants, we faced a number of substantial challenges impacting the tire industry generally, such as industry overcapacity, recessionary economic conditions in many parts of the world in 2008, particularly in North America and Europe, volatile and high raw material and energy costs, weakness in the North American auto industry, and increased competition from low-cost manufacturers. We also faced several Company-specific challenges, such as a significant negotiation with the USW on the terms of a new master labor agreement, the USW strike and the recovery from the USW strike, the implementation of a capital structure improvement plan, and the need to implement significant cost reductions. In the face of these challenges, the targets established for these grants were considered aggressive targets, the achievement of which would mean we were on our way to financial recovery and poised for future growth. Our performance during the period reflects significant price and product mix improvements that yearmore than offset raw material cost inflation, the completion of our capital structure improvement plan, additional debt reduction initiatives, the substantial progress made on our cost reduction and other strategic initiatives, including significant increases in our cost reduction targets, and the strong performance of our international business units, many of which achieved record results in sales and segment operating income during the three-year performance period. We exceeded our cumulative total cash flow, net of debt target for the2006-2008 performance period due to our efforts to manage cash flow during the performance period, particularly as economic conditions worsened in 2008. However, we did not achieve our cumulative net income target for the2006-2008 performance period, primarily due to the global economic downturn in 2008, especially in the fourth quarter of 2008, as we took actions to focus on cash management by reducing production and managing inventory levels.
Based on the results over the2006-2008 performance period, the Compensation Committee approved payout of the Executive Performance Plan awards for such period in an amount equal to 100% of the target amount per unit.


23


The table below shows payout amounts for each of the named executive officers in respect of their grants under the Executive Performance Plan.Plan for the2006-2008 performance period:
                         
  Target Payout as a
  Payout Range as a %
  Target Award
  Maximum Award
  Actual Award
  Actual Award as a %
 
Name
 % of Salary  of Salary  ($)  ($)  ($)  of Salary 
 
Keegan  378%  0%-756%  $4,600,000  $9,200,000  $4,600,000   378%
Wells  115%  0%-230%   400,000   800,000   400,000   115%
Kramer  192%  0%-384%   1,100,000   2,200,000   1,100,000   192%
Harvie  154%  0%-308%   770,000   1,540,000   770,000   154%
de Bok  176%  0%-352%   870,000   1,740,000   870,000   176%
Schmitz                  
In reviewing and considering payouts under the Executive Performance Plan for the2006-2008 performance period, the Compensation Committee considered not only the impact of the lost tax deductions associated with such payouts under Section 162(m) of the Code, but also the significant U.S. deferred tax assets available to us from prior periods, as well as the benefits realized by us and our stockholders from the successful efforts of our senior management team in leading the turnaround effort over the past several years. In balancing these considerations, the Compensation Committee concluded that it would be appropriate to approve payouts in respect of the grants for the2006-2008 performance period, notwithstanding the loss of the associated tax deduction.
Based on the results over the2006-2008 performance period, the Compensation Committee approved payouts with respect to performance share awards for such period in an amount equal to 100% of the target number of performance shares. Performance shares are paid 50% in cash and 50% in stock.
The table below shows the payout for each of the named executive officers in respect of their grants of performance shares for the2006-2008 performance period:
                     
  Target Award
  Maximum Award
  Actual Award
  Aggregate Dollar
  Aggregate Number of
 
Name
 (Shares)  (Shares)  (Shares)  Amount Paid Out(1)  Shares Paid Out 
 
Keegan  15,000   30,000   15,000  $43,800   7,500 
Wells  2,600   5,200   2,600   7,592   1,300 
Kramer  9,750   19,500   9,750   28,470   4,875 
Harvie  5,550   11,100   5,550   16,206   2,775 
de Bok  5,500   11,000   5,500   16,060   2,750 
Schmitz               
(1)Based on the market value of our Common Stock on December 31, 2008 of $5.84 (the average of the high and low per share sale prices of our Common Stock on that date).
 
Stock Options
 
The Compensation Committee annually grants stock options to named executive officers and other key employees to link executives to results earned by shareholders and build executive ownership. Through 2005, we made annual grants at the endStock options constitute an important element of our fourth fiscal quarter. In February 2006, we movedlong-term incentive compensation program and support several important objectives and principles. Because options result in gains only in the grant date, beginningevent that the stock price appreciates, they serve to align the interests of management with the 2007 annual grant, to the first Compensation Committee meeting following the end of the fiscal year (usually in February) to better match the grant to annual fiscal year performance. As a result, there was no annual grant during 2006. The Compensation Committee believes that annual grants of stock options provide additional long-term incentives to improve our future performance. In addition to annual grants, we make stock option grants to new hires and for special employee recognition throughout the year.shareholders.
 
Stock options are granted under the Performance Plans and generally have the following terms:
 
 • options vest in equal, annual installments over a4-year period;
• options have a ten-year term; and
 
 • the exercise price is equal to the market value of our common stockCommon Stock on the date of grant, with the market value under the 2005 Performance Plan determined by averaging the high and low sale prices of our common stockCommon Stock on that date.
 
In addition, each non-qualifiedEach stock option includes thegranted through 2007 included a right to the automatic grant of a new option (a “reinvestment option”) for thatthe number of shares tendered in the exercise of the original stock option.option and withheld to pay income taxes. The reinvestment option will be granted on, and will have an exercise price equal to the market value of our common stockCommon Stock on, the date of exercise.exercise of the original option. Reinvestment options are generally subject to the


24


same terms and conditions as the original stock option but do not include the right for a further reinvestment option. All reinvestment options vest one year from the date of grant.grant and will expire on the date the original option would have expired. The Compensation Committee did not include the reinvestment option feature in its February 2008 stock option grants under the 2005 Performance Plan due, in part, to changes in the accounting for compensation expense associated with stock option grants under SFAS 123R. In addition, the 2008 Performance Plan does not provide for a reinvestment option feature.
 
The amountportion of long-term incentive compensation provided in the form of stock options to be awardedoption grants each year is determined based on the number of available options under the Performance Plans, as well as market data on long term-compensation. We use a Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the number of stock options needed to provide the desired value consistent with overall median market compensation.
 
2008 Stock Option Grants
In 2008, the Compensation Committee awarded an aggregate of 1,581,360 stock options (excluding reinvestment options) under the 2005 and 2008 Performance Plans. The aggregate value of the stock options (excluding reinvestment options) granted to the current named executive officers in 2008 (measured at grant date fair value) was $4,851,550. This represented approximately 36% of total long-term compensation awarded to the current named executive officers in 2008. In February 2008, grants of 237,123; 12,333; 50,740; 33,311 and 29,905 stock options were made to Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Kramer, Harvie and de Bok, respectively, having the terms described above. Mr. Schmitz was granted 25,444 stock options in February 2008, but those stock options were forfeited upon his departure from the Company.
During 2008, reinvestment option grants were made to Messrs. Keegan and Harvie, with a grant date fair value of $391,650 and $489,258, respectively. See Note 5 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below. All options granted to named executive officers during 2008 were non-qualified stock options. Each unexercised stock option terminates automatically if the optionee ceases to be an employee of Goodyear or one of its subsidiaries for any reason, except that (a) upon retirement or disability of the optionee more than six months after the grant date, the stock option will become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of five years or its expiration date, and (b) in the event of the death of the optionee more than six months after the grant thereof, each stock option will become exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of three years after the date of death of the optionee or its expiration date.
Restricted Stock
The Compensation Committee occasionally grants restricted stock to named executive officers and other key employees, typically to replace similar stock-based awards or other benefits at a prior employer, to recognize extraordinary effort or for retention purposes. Restricted stock links executives to the results earned by shareholders and builds executive stock ownership.
Restricted stock has a minimum restriction period of three years, subject to the pro rata lapse of those restrictions. During the restriction period, the recipient is not entitled to delivery of the shares, restrictions are placed on the transferability of the shares, and all or a portion of the shares will be forfeited if the recipient terminates employment for reasons other than as approved by the Compensation Committee. Upon expiration of the restriction period, the appropriate number of shares of Common Stock will be delivered to the grantee free of all restrictions. During the restriction period for restricted shares, the grantee shall be entitled to vote restricted shares and, unless the Compensation Committee otherwise provides, to receive dividends, if any.
In February 2008, the Compensation Committee granted 93,492 and 59,835 shares of restricted stock to Messrs. Kramer and de Bok, respectively. These shares will vest 50% three years from the date of grant (in February 2011) and 50% four years from the date of grant (in February 2012). The Compensation Committee determined to make these grants in consideration of Mr. Kramer’s and Mr. de Bok’s significant contributions to Goodyear and importance to Goodyear in the future.
Pension Benefits
 
We provide most named executive officers with pension benefits under both qualified and non-qualified pension plans. The qualified plan benefits are pursuant to both a qualifieddefined benefit pension plan, the Goodyear Salaried Pension Plan (the “Salaried Plan”), and a defined contribution plan, the Goodyear Employee Savings Plan for Salaried Employees. The non-qualified plan benefits are pursuant to a partially funded, non-qualifieddefined benefit plan, the Goodyear Supplementary Pension Plan (the “Supplementary Plan”). For more information regardingNamed executive officers serving outside the terms of theseUnited


25


States, such as Mr. de Bok, participate in local Goodyear or governmental pension plans, andrather than the named executive officers’ accrued benefits under these plans, see the table captioned “Pension Benefits” and the accompanying narrative elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.Salaried Plan or Savings Plan.
 
The Salaried Plan is designed to provide tax-qualified pension benefits for most Goodyear employees. All of the named executive officersU.S.-based salaried employees hired prior to January 1, 2005. Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Harvie and Kramer participate in the Salaried Plan along with other Goodyear employees. Effective December 31, 2008, the Salaried Plan accrued benefit is frozen. Future tax-qualified benefit accruals for these four named executive officers and other Goodyear salaried employees are provided by Company contributions under the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan. (Salaried employees hired after December 31, 2004 participate in the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan from their date of hire.) Mr. de Bok does not participate in the Salaried Plan. He participates in Goodyear’s Netherlands Pension Plan and in government-sponsored (but Company-funded) pension plans in The Netherlands and Belgium.
The Supplementary Plan provides additional pension benefits to executive officers and certain other key individuals identified by the Compensation Committee. All of the current named executive officers participate in the Supplementary Plan. The Supplementary Plan provides pension benefits to participants who retire with at least 30 years of service or retire after age 55 with ten years of service. However, benefits payable under the Supplementary Plan are offset by the amount of any benefits payable under the Salaried Plan, the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan, applicablenon-U.S. pension plans, and certain prior employer pension plans. The Committee believes supplemental executive retirement plans such as the Supplementary Plan are an important part of executive compensation and are utilized by most large companies, many of which compete with the Company for executive talent. Retirement benefits, including those provided through a supplemental executive retirement plan, are a critical component of an executive’s overall compensation program and are essential to attracting, motivating and retaining talented executives with a history of leadership. Retirement benefits are an important factor in an executive’s decision to accept or reject a new position.
 
We also maintain a non-qualified unfunded Excess Benefit Plan that pays an additional pension benefit over that paid under the Salaried Plan if a participant does not meet the eligibility requirements of the Supplementary Plan.


22


The additional benefit is equal to the amount a participant would have received from the Salaried Plan but does not because of the limitations imposed by the Code on pension benefits under qualified plans. This plan is provided to allow the continuation of benefits from the qualified plan to individuals whose income exceeds the Code guidelines for qualified plans. For employees hired after December 31, 2004, and for all employees as of December 31, 2008, there is a corresponding non-qualified defined contribution excess plan that mirrors the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan.
Mr. Schmitz participated in the Savings Plan and the Supplementary Plan prior to his departure from the Company. Mr. Schmitz forfeited his Company contributions under the Savings Plan since he had less than two years of service at the time of his departure and he will not receive any benefits under the Supplementary Plan since he was not eligible for retirement at the time of his departure.
For more information regarding the terms of these plans and the named executive officers’ accrued benefits under these plans, see the table captioned “Pension Benefits” and the accompanying narrative elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
 
Severance andChange-in-Control Benefits
 
We provide for the payment of severance benefits to our named executive officers upon certain types of terminations of employment. The Goodyear Employee SeveranceContinuity Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Severance“Continuity Plan”) provides certain severance benefits to our employees and employees of our domestic subsidiaries who participate in the Executive Performance Plan, Performance Recognition Plan or Savings Plan. The Continuity Plan was adopted on April 10, 2007 and amended and restated The Goodyear Employee Severance Plan for Salaried Employees that was originally adopted in 1989.
The Continuity Plan was designed to attract, retain and motivate employees, provide for stability and continuity in the event of an actual or threatenedchange-in-control, and ensure that our employees are able to devote their full time and attention to the Company’s operations in the event of an actual or threatenedchange-in-control.
The Continuity Plan and the relatedchange-in-control triggers (commonly referred to as “double triggers”) are described in more detail under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, and generally provide for the payment of severance benefits if employment is terminated during certain periods before or within two years following achange-in-control of the Company. Thechange-in-control triggers in our 2008 Performance Plan are substantially similar to those in the Continuity Plan.


26


We selected the specificchange-in-control triggers used in the Continuity Plan, such as the acquisition of 20% or more of Goodyear’s Common Stock, a significant change in the composition of the Board of Directors or the acquisition of actual control of Goodyear, based upon our review of market practices, including provisions included in similar agreements of other public companies, and statutory provisions, such as the Ohio Control Share Acquisition Law, that could also be triggered in the event of achange-in-control. Based upon that review, we determined that the terms and conditions of the Continuity Plan, including the specificchange-in-control triggers, were consistent with market practices and are a necessary component of a competitive compensation program. We also believe that the Continuity Plan is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders because it ensures that we will have the continued commitment of our employees in the event of an actual or threatenedchange-in-control.
For additional information regarding the terms of the SeveranceContinuity Plan and benefits payable under such plan, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control.”Change-in-Control” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
 
In addition to benefits provided under the SeveranceContinuity Plan, under appropriate circumstances, such as reductions in force or elimination of positions, we may provide severance benefits to executive officers, including the named executive officers, whose employment terminates prior to retirement. In determining whether to provide such benefits and in what amount, we consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including length of service, circumstances of the termination, the executive officer’s contributions to companyCompany objectives, and other relevant factors. When we provide such benefits, typically the amount of severance is the equivalent of six to 18 months of base salary plus an amount based on the individual’s target bonusannual incentive payment then in effect over an equivalent period. The severance payment may be paid in a lump sum or in installments. We also may provide limited outplacement and personal financial planning services to eligible executive officers following their termination at the employee’s choice. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves any such severance benefits.termination.
 
In addition, Consistent with our severance practices described above, we provided Mr. Schmitz with installment payments totaling $973,127, comprised of $941,700 representing base salary, target annual incentive payment and health, welfare and other benefit payments for a 12 month period, $18,927 representing unused and accrued vacation and $12,500 for up to 12 months of outplacement services.
Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement also provides for the payment of severance compensation if we terminate his employment without “cause” or if Mr. Keegan terminates his employment for “good reason,” as such terms are defined in suchthat agreement. For additional information regarding the terms of Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement and the severance benefits payable under such agreement, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Among other things,In December 2008, Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement provideswas amended to extend the term of the agreement from February 28, 2009 until February 28, 2012. The amendments also made other changes required in order to comply with Section 409A of the Code.
The Compensation Committee believes that if Mr. Keegan is subject to any excise taxes resultingour severance benefits are a necessary component of a competitive compensation program and that those severance benefits are not significantly different from athe severance paymentbenefits typically in connection with a change in control, he is entitled to receive an additional amount sufficient to cover the amount of any such excise or related taxes.place at other companies.
 
Perquisites
 
We provide certain executive officers with certain personal benefits and perquisites, as described below. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and approved the perquisites described below. While the Compensation Committee does not consider these perquisites to be a significant component of executive compensation, it recognizes that such perquisites are an important factor in attracting and retaining talented executives.enabling our executive officers to focus on our business with minimal disruption.
 
Home Security Systems.  In order to enhance their safety, we pay for the cost of home security systems for a limited number of executive officers. We cover the cost of installation, monitoring and maintenance for these systems.
 
Use of Company Aircraft.  In appropriatelimited circumstances, and only if approved by the CEO, executive officers are permitted to use our company aircraft for personal travel. In these limited circumstances, the executive is also required to reimburse us for a portion of the cost of such use in an amount determined using the Standard Industry Fare Level.
 
Tire Program.  We offer our executive officers and Board members the opportunity to receive up to two sets of tires per year at our expense. Expenses covered include the cost of tires, mounting, balancing and disposal fees. We also provideDuring 2008, we provided reimbursement for the taxes on the income associated with this benefit. Beginning in


27


2009, we ceased providing tax reimbursements to our executive officers and directors for the tire program. Mr. Keegan does not participate in this program.
 
Financial Planning and Tax Preparation Services.  We offer financial assistance to our executive officers to help them cover the cost of financial planning and tax preparation services. In providing this benefit, we seek to alleviate our executives’ concern regarding personal financial planning so that they may devote their full attention to companyour business. The maximum annual cost to the companyCompany under this program is $9,000 per officer.
 
Club Memberships.  We pay the annual dues for one club membership for a limited number of executive officers. The membership is intended to be used primarily for business purposes, although executive officers may use the club for personal purposes. Executive officers are required to pay all incremental costs, other than the annual dues, related to their personal use of the club.
 
Annual Physical Exams.  Our executive officers may undergo an annual comprehensive physical examination for which we pay any amount that is not covered by insurance.


23


 
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
 
The Goodyear Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that provides named executive officers and other highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer various forms of compensation. The plan provides several deferral period options. For 2006, Mr. Rich is the onlyDuring 2008, no current named executive officer whoofficers made deferrals under the plan. In 2006, Mr. Rich deferred his 2005 Performance Recognition Plan bonus into Goodyear stock units, and received a 20% premium in stock units as provided in the Deferred Compensation Plan. This premium recognizes the greater risks associated with receiving his bonus payout in stock instead of cash. For participants, this is an investment decision made with dollars earned in the annual bonus program and offers an additional means to save for retirement. There is no premium or guaranteed return associated with the deferral. The stock units will be converted to shares of Goodyear common stock and paid to Mr. Rich on the first business day of the third year following the end of the plan year under which the award was earned.
 
For additional information regarding the terms of the deferred compensation plan and participant balances, see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
 
Other Benefits
 
Payments to Overseas Executives.Expatriate Employees.  Where warranted, we provide tax equalization payments, housing allowances, and other similar benefits to employees, including our executivesexecutive officers, living overseasoutside of their home country to compensate them for the additional costs of their overseasthose assignments.
 
Goodyear Employee Savings Plan.  The Savings Plan permits eligible employees, including all of the named executive officers (other than Mr. de Bok), to contribute 1% to 50% of their compensation to their Savings Plan account, subject to an annual contribution ceiling ($15,00015,500 in 2006)2008). Savings Plan participants who are age 50 or older and contributing at the maximum plan limits or at the annual contribution ceiling are entitled to make“catch-up” contributions annually up to a specified amount ($5,000 in 2006)2008). ContributionsEmployee pre-tax contributions to the Savings Plan are not included in the current taxable income of the employee pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Code. Employee Roth contributions are permitted under the Savings Plan and are included in current taxable income. Employee contributions are invested, at the direction of the participant, in any one or more of the fifteen available fundsand/or in mutual funds under a self directedself-directed account.
 
Tax Deductibility of Pay
Section 162(m) of the Code provides that compensation paid to a public company’s chief executive officer and its three other highest paid executive officers (other than its chief financial officer) in excess of $1 million is not deductible unless certain requirements have been satisfied. The Compensation Committee believes that awards under our Performance Plans qualify for full deductibility under Section 162(m).
Although compensation paid under two of our plans, the Executive Performance Plan and the Performance Recognition Plan is performance-based, it does not qualify for the deductibility exception for performance-based compensation and is subject to the Section 162(m) limitation on deductibility. As discussed in greater detail below, in light of our financial condition and capital structure in recent years, the Compensation Committee believes it is in our and our stockholders’ best interests to award incentive compensation under the Executive Performance Plan and the Performance Recognition Plan that does not qualify for the exception for performance-based compensation. The 2008 Performance Plan and the Goodyear Management Incentive Plan will permit future awards similar to those under the Executive Performance Plan and the Performance Recognition Plan to qualify for full deductibility under Section 162(m).


28


Stockholding Guidelines
To better link the interests of management and our stockholders, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted stockholding guidelines for our executive officers effective January 1, 2006. These guidelines specify a number of shares that our executive officers are expected to accumulate and hold within five years of the later of the effective date of the program or the date of appointment as an officer. The specific share requirements are based on a multiple of annual base salary ranging from one to five times, with the higher multiples applicable to executive officers having the highest levels of responsibility. The stockholding requirement for Mr. Keegan is five times his annual base salary, for Messrs. Kramer, Harvie and de Bok is four times their annual base salary, and for Mr. Wells is three times his annual base salary. Amounts invested in the Goodyear stock fund of the Savings Plan, share equivalent units in our deferred compensation plan, restricted stock, and stock owned outright by executive officers (or their spouses) are counted as ownership in assessing compliance with the guidelines. Unexercised stock options and unearned performance shares are not counted toward compliance with the guidelines.
The earliest compliance date for our executive officers is January 1, 2011. Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Harvie and de Bok have met the required stockholding guidelines well in advance of the required compliance date.
In October 2007, the Compensation Committee revised the stockholding guidelines to incorporate stock retention provisions. If an executive officer has met their stockholding requirement, they are required to retain 25% of the net shares from any exercised options for at least one year from the date of exercise. If an executive officer has not met their stockholding requirement, they are required to retain 75% of the net shares from any exercised options until they have met their stockholding requirement. Net shares are the shares remaining after payment of the exercise price and any withholding taxes.
We have adopted, as part of our insider trading policy, prohibitions on the short sale of our equity securities and the purchase, sale or issuance of options or rights relating to our Common Stock.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
 
We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussion with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Goodyear’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008.
 
The Compensation Committee
 
John G. Breen,
G. Craig Sullivan, Chairman
Gary D. Forsee
William J. Hudson, Jr.Denise M. Morrison
G. Craig Sullivan
Denise M. Morrison
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.Rodney O’Neal
Thomas H. Weidemeyer


2429


 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The table below sets forth information regarding the compensation of the CEO, and the Chief Financial Officer of Goodyear (the “CFO”) and, the persons who were, at December 31, 2006,2008, the other three most highly compensated executive officers of Goodyear and the former CFO (collectively, the “named executive officers”) for services in all capacities to Goodyear and its subsidiaries during 2006.2006, 2007 and 2008.
 
                                    
              Change in
    
              Pension Value
    
              and
    
              Nonqualified
    
            Non-Equity
 Deferred
    
Name and
       Stock
 Option
 Incentive Plan
 Compensation
 All Other
  
Principal
   Salary
 Bonus
 Awards
 Awards
 Compensation
 Earnings
 Compensation
 Total
Position
 Year ($) ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) ($)(4) ($)(5) ($)(6) ($)
 
Robert J. Keegan
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and President
  2006  $1,133,333  $2,244,000  $91,191  $1,949,118  $8,000,000  $3,802,099  $93,377  $17,313,118 
Richard J. Kramer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  2006   507,033   667,400  59,274   379,517   2,000,000   260,948   18,006   3,892,178 
Jonathan D. Rich
President, North American Tire
  2006   451,733   200,000  163,933   367,894   2,000,000   216,409   20,629   3,420,598 
C. Thomas Harvie
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
  2006   453,367   411,800  33,741   349,033   1,600,000   547,983   11,969   3,407,893 
Joseph M. Gingo
Executive Vice President Quality Systems and Chief Technical Officer
  2006   382,000   351,000  23,102   216,240   1,200,000   1,050,744   8,397   3,231,483 
                                    
                   Change in
       
                   Pension Value
       
                   and
       
                   Nonqualified
       
                Non-Equity
  Deferred
       
Name and
         Stock
  Option
  Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
    
Principal
    Salary
  Bonus
 Awards
  Awards
  Compensation
  Earnings
  Compensation
  Total
 
Position
 Year  ($)  ($)(1) ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($)(4)  ($)(5)  ($)(6)  ($) 
 
Robert J. Keegan Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer                                   
and President  2008  $1,216,667  $0 $(462,150) $5,065,187  $4,600,000  $6,269,277(7) $131,782  $16,820,763 
   2007   1,176,667   3,500,000  625,800   3,836,335   8,800,000   2,429,883   82,323   20,451,008 
   2006   1,133,333   2,244,000  91,191   1,949,118   8,000,000   3,802,099   93,377   17,313,118 
Darren R. Wells                                   
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(8)  2008  $348,660  $0 $0  $125,102  $400,000  $76,313  $16,414  $966,489 
Richard J. Kramer President, North American Tire  2008  $573,333  $0 $294,240  $804,593  $1,100,000  $464,632  $25,229  $3,262,027 
   2007   550,000   1,000,000  430,539   674,884   2,140,000   209,556   18,393   5,023,372 
   2006   507,033   667,400  59,274   379,517   2,000,000   260,948   18,006   3,892,178 
C. Thomas Harvie Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  2008  $500,000  $0 $(181,712) $1,076,290  $770,000  $311,340  $12,959  $2,488,877 
   2007   472,333   600,000  251,145   954,242   1,660,000   385,085   11,503   4,334,308 
   2006   453,367   411,800  33,741   349,033   1,600,000   547,983   11,969   3,407,893 
Arthur de Bok President, Europe, Middle East and Africa Tire(9)  2008  $495,000  $0 $239,343  $332,213  $870,000  $132,467  $31,353  $2,100,376 
   2007   427,333   422,500  254,202   235,231   1,860,000   56,401   29,227   3,284,894 
W. Mark Schmitz Former Chief Financial Officer(10)  2008  $407,549  $ $13,399  $155,734(11) $  $(12) $1,001,935(13) $1,578,617 
   2007   210,417   317,528  34,230   35,500      391,292   3,499   992,466 
 
 
(1)(1) Represents amounts awarded under the Performance Recognition Plan for performance during 2006.the year indicated. For additional information regarding amounts awarded to the named executive officers under the Performance Recognition Plan, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Annual Compensation — Annual Cash BonusesIncentives Under the Performance Recognition Plan” and “— 2006 Bonus2008 Payouts Under the Performance Recognition Plan” below.Plan.”
 
(2)(2) Represents the amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for 2006the year indicated in respect of outstanding stock awards in accordance with SFAS 123(R),123R, excluding estimates of forfeitures in the case of awards with service-based vesting conditions.conditions and, with respect to each of Messrs. Wells and de Bok, the reversal of expense for stock awards relating to periods before he became a named executive officer. The assumptions made in valuing stock awards reported in this column are discussed in Note to the Consolidated Financial Statements No. 1, “Accounting Policies” under “Stock-Based Compensation” and Note 12,to the Consolidated Financial Statements No. 13, “Stock Compensation Plans” to Goodyear’s consolidated financial statements included in its annual reportAnnual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. On February 22, 2006, performance share units were granted in the amount of 15,000, 9,750, 6,800, 5,550, 3,800 to Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Rich, Harvie and Gingo, respectively, with a performance period of January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2008. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Performance Shares” and “— 2008 Performance Share Grants.” See also “Grants of Plan-Based Awards — 2006 Performance Share Grants”Awards” below. For Mr. Rich, also includes 8,323 stock units issued pursuant to the Goodyear Executive Deferred Compensation Plan in an amount equal to 20% of the amount of Mr. Rich’s 2005 bonus, which Mr. Rich deferred. See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”
 
(3)(3) Represents the amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for 2006the year indicated in respect of outstanding option awards, including reinvestment options, in accordance with SFAS 123(R),123R, excluding estimates of forfeitures in the case of awards with service-based vesting conditions. The assumptions made in valuing option awards reported in this column are discussed in Note to the


30


Consolidated Financial Statements No. 1, “Accounting Policies” under “Stock-Based Compensation” and Note 12,to the Consolidated Financial Statements No. 13, “Stock Compensation Plans” to Goodyear’s consolidated financial statements included in its annual reportAnnual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. Includes option2008. For additional information regarding such grants, to those named executive officers who reloaded options during 2006.see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Stock Options” and “— 2008 Stock Option Grants.” See also “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.
 
(4)Represents amounts awarded under the Executive Performance Plan in respect of the performance period of January 1, 2004, throughperiods ending on December 31, 2006.2006, 2007 and 2008. For additional information regarding such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation —


25


Cash-Based Awards Under the Executive Performance Plan” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards — 2006 Grants and“— Payouts for the2006-2008 Performance Period Under the Executive Performance Plan” below.Plan and With Respect to Performance Shares.”
 
(5)(5) Represents change in pension value for each named executive officer. No nonqualified deferred compensation earnings are required to be reported.reported under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.
 
(6)(6) Includes amounts for home security system installation and monitoring expenses, personal financial planning services, personal use of company aircraft, annual dues for club memberships, the cost of annual physical exams, and provision of up to two sets of automobile tires per year. For Mr. Keegan, this includes $32,760$80,982 for home security system installationthe personal use of company aircraft and monitoring expense, and also includes $38,162 for premiums on life insurance policies whichthat will be used to cover Goodyear’s obligation to make a charitable donation recommended by Mr. Keegan following his death pursuant to the Director’s Charitable Award Program. For more information regarding suchthat program, please see “Director Compensation” below. The aggregate incremental cost to the Company for the personal use of company of providing the home security systemaircraft is equal to the invoice cost of such system and related services,actual flight costs less the amount, based on the Standard Industry Fare Level, reimbursed to the Company, and the aggregate incremental cost of the life insurance policies is the annual premium and related fees. For Mr. de Bok, this also includes amounts for a company car. Also includes $368, $302, $786,$1,639, $588 and $269$573 for Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, RichWells, Harvie and Gingo,Schmitz, respectively, which represents reimbursement of taxes in respect of income associated with the company’sCompany’s provision of up to two sets of automobile tires per year. Mr. Keegan does not participate in the tire program. Beginning in 2009, the Company ceased providing reimbursement of taxes in respect of income associated with the tire program.
(7) The actuarial present value of Mr. Keegan’s pension benefits increased significantly in 2008 primarily due to an increase in average pay over the relevant ten-year period and a decrease in the interest rate used to calculate his lump sum benefit from 5.25% to 4.0%.
(8) Mr. Wells was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective October 17, 2008.
(9) The amounts in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column were converted from euros to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at December 31, 2006 of €1 = $1.32, December 31, 2007 of €1 = $1.46 and December 31, 2008 of €1 = $1.40, and the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column were converted from euros to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at December 31, 2007 of €1 = $1.46 and December 31, 2008 of €1 = $1.40. All other amounts were originally determined in U.S. dollars.
(10) Mr. Schmitz was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on August 7, 2007, and served in that position until October 16, 2008.
(11) Amounts in the “Option Awards” column do not reflect the forfeiture of all of Mr. Schmitz’s outstanding stock option awards due to his departure from the Company.
(12) Amounts in the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column do not reflect the forfeiture of Mr. Schmitz’s accumulated pension benefit of $391,292 due to his departure from the Company.
(13) Amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column include, in addition to the items described in footnote 6 above, a severance payment of $941,700 representing base salary, target annual incentive payments and health, welfare and other benefit payments for a 12 month period, $18,927 representing unused and accrued vacation and $12,500 for up to 12 months of outplacement services. Mr. Schmitz received company contributions to his defined contribution plan accounts during 2008, but all of those contributions were forfeited upon his departure from the Company and, therefore, are not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
 
Employment Agreement
 
Mr. Keegan’s compensation is based, in part, on a written employment agreement entered into in 2000. The agreement provided for an initial salarya pension service adjustment so that the total value of $800,000all pension benefits received by Mr. Keegan from both Goodyear and an option to purchase 250,000 shares of restricted stock, the restrictions on which lapsed in 2002. Additionally, the agreement credited Mr. Keegan’s previous service at Eastman Kodak Company towards his pension benefits payable by Goodyear.will be equivalent to a full-career Goodyear pension. The agreement also established Mr. Keegan’s participation in the Performance Recognition Plan as well as our equity-based incentive compensation programs.


31


Mr. Keegan’s agreement was supplemented in 2004 to provide for the payment of severance compensation in the event of certainthe termination of his employment termination events.by the Board without cause or by him for good reason. The severance compensation would consist of (i) two times the sum of Mr. Keegan’s annual base salary and target bonusannual incentive payment opportunity in effect at the time of termination, plus (ii) the pro rata portion of Mr. Keegan’s target bonusannual incentive payment opportunity for the then current fiscal year.year of termination. The agreement restricts Mr. Keegan from participating in any business that competes with Goodyear for a period of two years after termination. The supplemental agreement was due to expire on February 28, 2009. In December 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board extended the term of the supplemental agreement expiresuntil February 28, 2009.
2006 Salary Decisions
In addition2012 and made other minor changes required in order to using the methodologies described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Annual Compensation — Base Salary” for setting salary guidelines, in 2006 we compared total compensation levels for our five most highly compensated officers and 17 additional executives against survey data provided by Towers Perrin for approximately 155 U.S. industrial companiescomply with annual revenues of $10 billion or more. We concluded that the base salaries of our named executive officers who are direct reports to the CEO were, in the aggregate, below the market median, in accordance with the USW Agreement. However, the base salarySection 409A of the CFO was found to be significantly below the median for his position. Based on the CFO’s skills and experience, performance and significant contributions to the success of our operations in 2005, his base salary relative to the market median, and our desire to retain him in this position, in February 2006 the Compensation Committee increased his base salary 14.9% effective May 1, 2006, bringing his base salary within 10% of market median.
In 2006, the overall increase in base salaries for all executive officers, excluding the CEO, was 3.18%. Mr. Keegan, Mr. Rich, Mr. Harvie and Mr. Gingo received increases of 4.5%, 2.2%, 2.4% and 2.4%, respectively. Salaries of the named executive officers in 2006 were an average of 5% lower than the median indicated by the salary guidelines described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Annual Compensation — Base Salary”. Salaries in 2006 averaged approximately 33% of total annual cash compensation paid to the named executive officers.


26


2006 Bonus Payouts Under Performance Recognition Plan
In 2006, the performance criteria used for bonus awards under the Performance Recognition Plan were as follows:
• for corporate officers (including Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Harvie and Gingo): (i) Goodyear’s net sales, less cost of goods sold, selling, administrative and general expenses, and finance charges (“adjusted EBIT”) and (ii) Goodyear’s “operating cash flow” (primarily cash flow from operations and investing activities, each adjusted for exchange, less the change in restricted cash and dividends paid to minority interests in subsidiaries), both equally weighted at 50% and independent of each other; and
• for officers of our six operating units (including Mr. Rich): (i) the operating unit’s net sales, less cost of goods sold and selling, administrative and general expenses (“EBIT”) and (ii) the operating unit’s operating cash flow (as defined above), both equally weighted at 50% and independent of each other.
Adjusted EBIT is derived from our audited financial statements by reducing net sales for cost of goods sold, selling, administrative and general expenses, and finance charges, and EBIT is derived from our audited financial statements by reducing net sales for cost of goods sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. The Compensation Committee used Adjusted EBIT for corporate officers, rather than EBIT, to provide an incentive to reduce finance charges, given existing debt levels. Overall, the Compensation Committee believed the financial targets reflected a significant stretch for the Company given the dynamic business environment, rapidly increasing costs of raw materials and the uncertainty with respect to the renewal of the predecessor to the USW Agreement, which expired in 2006.
As described above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee uses a two-step process to determine the level of funding of the bonus pool available for payouts. First, the committee compares actual results with the target performance level for the two financial performance criteria. This comparison is done for the company overall, and for each operating unit. These results are referred to as the “actual results.” Second, the committee considers and takes into account extraordinary items and other relevant factors to determine whether the actual results should be adjusted.
In February 2007, the Compensation Committee reviewed actual results for 2006 with respect to achievement of the company-wide and operating unit financial performance criteria. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered several extraordinary items and other relevant factors to adjust those actual results, including the following:
• consistent with past practices, the committee excluded cash restructuring charges and accelerated depreciation expense (including asset impairment charges related to restructuring activities) related to plant closures announced during 2006;
• the committee made certain adjustments related to the impact of the USW strike; and
• certain adjustments were made to the operating cash flow results for the Company based on the CEO’s and Compensation Committee’s overall assessment of the Company’s performance and circumstances during 2006.
For overall company results (the performance of which is relevant for determining bonus amounts for Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Harvie and Gingo), target Adjusted EBIT was $674 million and actual Adjusted EBIT (adjusted as described above) was $574 million, or approximately 15% below target, and target operating cash flow was $0 and actual operating cash flow (adjusted as described above) was $106 million, or significantly in excess of the target. In reviewing these results, the Compensation Committee also considered the challenges we faced during 2006, including the significant operating challenges posed by the USW strike. In light of the company’s Adjusted EBIT and operating cash flow results and the other factors described above, the Compensation Committee determined to fund the corporate portion of the bonus pool in an amount equal to 132% of the target amount.
The North American Tire unit (the performance of which is relevant for determining Mr. Rich’s bonus) failed to meet its EBIT and cash flow targets, even after adjustments were taken into consideration. Nevertheless, the CEO recommended to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee agreed, that the bonus pool for the North American Tire unit be funded in an amount equal to 50% of the target amount. As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, funding of the bonus pool for officers of our six operating units is based 60% on that operating unit’s results and 40% on overall company results. Funding of the North American Tire unit’s bonus pool at the 50% level is equal to approximately 40% of the company-wide bonus pool of 132%. In addition,


27


the decision to fund the bonus pool at this level was based on the CEO’s assessment that the North American Tire unit and its employees should be rewarded for their strong efforts during an extremely challenging year and for creating solid business platforms for future growth. During 2006, the North American Tire unit faced severe operating challenges, including a12-week strike and a decline in overall demand for tire products. The CEO also considered that, despite these challenges, management of the North American Tire unit continued consistently to push its team for strong performance and achieved a number of significant accomplishments, including: (i) retention of customers during the USW strike, (ii) reaching agreement with the USW on the terms of a new master labor agreement that we estimate will result in savings of more than $600 million through 2009, (iii) taking significant restructuring actions such as announcing the closure of two factories, (iv) improving the market share of the Goodyear brand in the face of an overall decline in the consumer tire market in North America, and (v) maintaining strong dealer relationships and distribution networks during the market slowdown and strike.
The bonus pools for the other operating units were funded, based on those units’ performance compared with targeted performance, in amounts that ranged from 50% to 173% of the target amounts for such units. Overall , the aggregate bonus pool was funded in the amount of $30,845,100, or 102% of the overall target bonus amount.
The Compensation Committee then reviewed the CEO’s assessment of each named executive officer’s performance during 2006 and his contribution to the company’s results in 2006. With respect to the CEO, the Compensation Committee also considered its own assessment of the CEO’s performance during 2006 and his contribution to the company’s results in 2006. In particular, the CEO and Compensation Committee considered the extraordinary efforts of a number of the named executive officers during the USW strike as well as their substantial contributions in furthering the Company’s strategic initiatives.Code. As a result of these considerations, and in light of the aggregate amount availablea recent change in the bonus pool,tax law, beginning in 2011 annual incentive payments to Mr. Keegan under the Management Incentive Plan will be subject to the Section 162(m) limitation on deductibility even though those payments will be performance-based. In considering the extension of Mr. Keegan’s supplemental agreement, the Compensation Committee approvedweighed the following 2006 payout amounts for named executive officers underbenefits realized by us and our stockholders from the Performance Recognition Plan:
                         
  Target Payout
  Payout Range
           Actual Award
 
  as a % of
  as a % of
  Target Award
  Maximum Award
  Actual Award
  as a % of
 
Name
 Salary  Salary  ($)  ($)  ($)  Salary 
 
Keegan  148%  0%-296%  $1,700,000  $3,400,000  $2,244,000   195%
Kramer  89%  0%-178%   470,000   940,000   667,400   126%
Rich  88%  0%-176%   400,000   800,000   200,000   44%
Harvie  63%  0%-126%   290,000   580,000   411,800   90%
Gingo  68%  0%-136%   260,000   520,000   351,000   91%
As a group,successful efforts of Mr. Keegan over the named executive officers received payouts at an averagepast several years, his expected future contributions, the duration of 109%the supplemental agreement and the significant U.S. deferred tax assets available to us from prior periods, against the impact of their target amount. The Performance Recognition Plan payouts represent an averagethe lost tax deductions associated with any 2011 and 2012 annual incentive payments. In balancing these considerations, the Compensation Committee concluded that it would be appropriate and equitable to approve the extension of approximately 132% of total 2006 cash compensation for the named executive officers.supplemental agreement on the same economic terms that have been in effect since its initial execution, notwithstanding the recent change in the tax law.
 
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
The following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to the named executive officers during 2006.2008.
 
                                                 
                  All Other
     Grant
                All Other
 Option
     Date Fair
                Stock
 Awards:
   Closing
 Value of
                Awards:
 Number of
 Exercise
 Market
 Stock
                Number
 Securities
 or Base
 Price
 and
    Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) of Shares
 Underlying
 Price of
 on
 Option
  Grant
 Threshold
 Target
 Maximum
     Maximum
 of Stock or
 Options
 Option
 Grant
 Awards
Name
 Date ($) ($) ($) Threshold (#) Target (#) (#) Units (#)(3) (#)(4) Awards ($/Sh)(5) Date ($)
 
Keegan  2/22/06  $2,300,000  $4,600,000  $9,200,000   7,500   15,000   30,000                 $220,800 
Kramer  2/22/06   550,000   1,100,000   2,200,000   4,875   9,750   19,500                  143,520 
Rich  2/22/06   505,000   1,010,000   2,020,000   3,400   6,800   13,600                   100,096 
Rich  2/21/06                           49,936               735,557 
Rich  3/13/06                               17,240  $13.16  $12.99   99,302 
Harvie  2/22/06   385,000   770,000   1,540,000   2,775   5,550   11,100                  81,696 
Gingo  2/22/06   285,000   570,000   1,140,000   1,900   3,800   7,600                   55,936 
Gingo  5/11/06                             13,390   14.81   14.65   77,126 
                                                 
                          All Other
        Grant
 
                       All Other
  Option
        Date Fair
 
                       Stock
  Awards:
  Exercise
  Closing
  Value of
 
                       Awards:
  Number of
  or Base
  Market
  Stock
 
     Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity
  Estimated Future Payouts Under
  Number
  Securities
  Price of
  Price
  and
 
     Incentive Plan Awards (1)  Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)  of Shares
  Underlying
  Option
  on
  Option
 
  Grant
  Threshold
  Target
  Maximum
        Maximum
  of Stock or
  Options
  Awards
  Grant
  Awards
 
Name
 Date  ($)  ($)  ($)  Threshold (#)  Target (#)  (#)  Units (#)(3)  (#)  ($/Sh)(6)  Date  ($) 
 
Keegan  2/21/2008  $2,194,500  $4,389,000  $8,778,000   10,140   20,279   40,558              $26.46  $536,582 
Keegan  2/21/2008                               237,123(4) $26.74   26.46   3,165,592 
Keegan  3/18/2008                               40,418(5)  24.77   25.20   391,650 
Wells  2/21/2008   200,000   400,000   800,000   2,389   4,777   9,554               26.46   126,399 
Wells  2/21/2008                               12,333(4)  26.74   26.46   164,646 
Wells  10/15/2008   135,000   270,000   540,000   1,150   2,300   4,600               10.34   23,782 
Kramer  2/21/2008   600,000   1,200,000   2,400,000   8,056   16,111   32,222   93,492           26.46   2,900,095 
Kramer  2/21/2008                               50,740(4)  26.74   26.46   677,379 
Harvie  2/21/2008   385,000   770,000   1,540,000   4,955   9,910   19,820               26.46   262,219 
Harvie  2/21/2008                               33,311(4)  26.74   26.46   444,702 
Harvie  3/24/2008                               50,491(5)  26.85   26.61   489,258 
de Bok  2/21/2008   475,000   950,000   1,900,000   5,235   10,469   20,938   59,835           26.46   1,860,244 
de Bok  2/21/2008                               31,874(4)  26.74   26.46   425,518 
Schmitz  2/21/2008   440,000   880,000   1,760,000   3,740   7,479   14,958               26.46   197,894 
Schmitz  2/21/2008                               25,444(4)  26.74   26.46   339,677 
 
(1)Represents grants of awards under the Executive Performance Plan. For additional information regarding such awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Cash-Based Awards Under the Executive Performance Plan” and “— 20062008 Grants and Payouts Under the Executive Performance Plan” below.Plan.”


28


(2)Grants of performance shares under the 2005 and 2008 Performance Plans. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Performance Shares” and “— 20062008 Performance Share Grants” below.Grants.”
 
(3)Represents GoodyearGrants of restricted stock units issued to Mr. Rich pursuant to the Goodyear Executive Deferred Compensation Plan in respect of Mr. Rich’s deferral of his 2005 bonus awardedawards under the 2005 Performance Recognition Plan as well asPlan. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Restricted Stock.” Messrs. Kramer and de Bok paid $935 and $598, respectively, for their restricted stock units equal to 20% of the deferred bonus amount. See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”awards.
 
(4)Grants of stock option awards (with tandem stock appreciation rights for Mr. de Bok) under the 2005 Performance Plan. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and


32


Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Stock Options” and “— 2008 Stock Option Grants.”
(5)Represents reloadreinvestment option grants for Mr. GingoMessrs. Keegan and Mr. RichHarvie during 2006. These options were granted pursuant to a reload feature in previously granted stock options. Under the reload feature, the optionee has the right to the automatic grant of a new option (a “reinvestment option”) for that number of shares tendered in the exercise of the original stock option plus any shares tendered to pay taxes upon such exercise.2008. The reinvestment option is granted on, and has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on, the date of the exercise of the original stock option and is subject to the same terms and conditions as the original stock option except for the exercise price and the reinvestment option feature. Such reinvestment options vest one year from the date of grant. On May 11, 2006, Mr. Gingo was granted 13,390 reload options, of which 9,254 expire on December 3, 2012, 3,802 expire on December 2, 2013, and 334 expire on December 9, 2014. On March 13, 2006, Mr. Rich was granted 17,240 options as a reload grant. The reload option vests one year fromfollowing table sets forth the date of grant. Of the 17,240 reload options, 3,530 options expire on December 2, 2013, and 13,710 expire on December 3, 2012. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Compensation — Long-Term Compensation — Stock Options” and “— 2006 Stock Option Grants” below.
(5)The exercise price of each stock option is equal to 100%expiration dates of the per share fair market value of the common stock on the date granted (calculated as the average of the high and low stock price for such date). Thereinvestment option exercise priceand/or withholding tax obligations may be paid by delivery of shares of common stock valued at the fair market value on the date of exercise.grants.
 
2006 Grants and Payouts Under the Executive Performance Plan
2006 Grants
The Compensation Committee awarded an aggregate of 167,590 units in respect of the2006-2008 performance period under the Executive Performance Plan. The performance criteria for the 2006 grants are cumulative net income and cumulative total cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally. The performance targets for the2006-2008 period generally require relatively greater improvement in performance than had been contemplated under prior years’ grants. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to make the2006-2008 performance targets incrementally harder to achieve than those under prior grants to reflect the company’s emergence from a challenging period of recovery that began in 2003. While the committee believes the2006-2008 targets are achievable, the targets are premised on the company meaningfully growing both net income and cumulative total cash flow during the three-year performance period.
The value of the units granted for the2006-2008 performance period (assuming payout at $100 per unit) represents approximately 63% of the value of total long-term compensation awarded to the named executive officers in 2006. Included in the grants for the 2006-2008 performance period were grants of 46,000, 11,000, 10,100, 7,700 and 5,700 units to Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Rich, Harvie and Gingo, respectively. Payment on each unit may range between $0 and $200 depending upon the attainment of the performance criteria described above. The number of units granted for the2006-2008 performance period is less than the number of units granted for the2005-2007 performance period, in part due to the shift from cash-based long-term compensation to more equity-based long-term compensation, as discussed above. It is expected that an increasing portion of overall compensation previously represented by grants under the Executive Performance Plan will be replaced going forward by grants of performance shares under the Performance Plans, reflecting a trend in the mix of our overall compensation to executives over the past two years as the market value of our common stock has risen and made stock-based compensation a more viable alternative than in prior years.


29


Payouts for the2004-2006 Performance Period
In February 2007, the Compensation Committee approved payouts in respect of awards granted for the2004-2006 performance period. The table below shows the performance goals and corresponding payout amounts (per unit) for awards granted for the2004-2006 performance period.
                 
  Payout per Unit 
  $0-$99(1)  $100  $150  $200 
 
Performance Measure
                
(2004-2006):
                
Cumulative net income $<(333)million  $(333)million   $93 million  $307 million 
% of target     100%  128%  192%
                 
Cumulative total cash flow $<(158)million  $(158)million   $242 million  $442 million 
% of target     100%  253%  380%
(1)Payouts at less than the target level are made at the discretion of the CEO, with the approval of the Compensation Committee.
The Executive Performance Plan permits the Committee to make adjustments to actual company results for the performance measures for extraordinary items and other relevant factors. Over the three-year performance period for the grants shown above, such items include the USW strike and restructuring charges. The table below shows actual and adjusted results with respect to the performance measures over the2004-2006 performance period.
             
  Performance (as %
Reinvestment Options
 
Name
 TargetGrant Date  Actual ResultsNumber  Adjusted Resultsof target)Expiration Date 
 
Performance Measure
Keegan
3/18/2008   38,440   12/9/2014
Keegan3/18/2008   1,978   12/6/2015 
(2004-2006):
Harvie
3/24/2008   16,132   12/4/2010
Harvie3/24/2008   4,743   12/3/2012 
Cumulative net incomeHarvie $(333)million3/24/2008   $13 million1,337   $854 million12/2/2013
Harvie3/24/2008   >200%
13,642   12/9/2014
Harvie3/24/2008   14,637   12/6/2015 
Cumulative total cash flow(158)million2,353 million2,509 million>200%
 
Based on the adjusted results over the2004-2006 performance period, the Compensation Committee approved payout of the Executive Performance Plan awards for such period in an amount equal to 200% of the target amount per unit.
As previously noted, some of the grants made in 2004 carried guaranteed minimum payouts of either $25 or $50 per unit. During the performance period of these grants, Goodyear faced a number of substantial challenges facing the tire industry generally, such as increasing competition from low-cost manufacturers, manufacturing overcapacity and rising raw material prices. Goodyear was also faced with several company-specific challenges, such as a significant negotiation with the United Steelworkers on the terms of a new master labor agreement, the implementation of a capital structure improvement plan, and the need to implement significant cost reductions. In the face of these challenges, the targets established for the 2004 grants were considered stretch targets, the achievement of which would mean the company was on its way to financial recovery and poised for future growth. Goodyear’s performance during the period reflects the substantial progress made on its cost reduction and other strategic initiatives, its turnaround plan for its North American Tire business as well as the exemplary performance of its international business units, many of which consistently achieved record results in sales and segment operating income. This performance resulted in cumulative net income and cash flow significantly in excess of the targets established in early 2004.
The table below shows payout amounts for each of the named executive officers in respect of their grants under the Executive Performance Plan for the performance period2004-2006:
                         
  Target Payout as a
  Payout Range as a %
  Target Award
  Maximum Award
  Actual Award
  Actual Award as a %
 
Name
 % of Salary  of Salary  ($)  ($)  ($)  of Salary 
 
Keegan  348%  0% — 696%  $4,000,000  $8,000,000  $8,000,000   696%
Kramer  188%  0% — 376%   1,000,000   2,000,000   2,000,000   376%
Rich  220%  0% — 440%   1,000,000   2,000,000   2,000,000   440%
Harvie  175%  0% — 350%   800,000   1,600,000   1,600,000   350%
Gingo  155%  0% — 310%   600,000   1,200,000   1,200,000   310%
(6)The exercise price of each stock option is equal to 100% of the per share fair market value of the Common Stock on the date granted (calculated as the average of the high and low stock price for such date). The option exercise price and/or withholding tax obligations may be paid by delivery of shares of Common Stock valued at the fair market value on the date of exercise.


3033


Compensation under the Executive Performance Plan is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code. In reviewing and considering payouts under the Executive Performance Plan for the2004-2006 performance period, the Compensation Committee considered not only the impact of the lost tax deductions associated with such payouts, but also the significant tax loss carryforwards available to us from prior periods, as well as the benefits realized by our company and our stockholders from the successful efforts of our senior management team in leading the turnaround effort over the past several years. In balancing these considerations, the Compensation Committee concluded that it would be appropriate to approve payouts in respect of the grants for the2004-2006 performance period, notwithstanding the loss of the associated tax deduction.
 
2006 Performance Share Grants
In February 2006, the Compensation Committee awarded an aggregate of 1,083,800 performance shares under the Performance Plans. The vesting period for these shares is2006-2008 and the performance criteria over this period are cumulative net income and cumulative total cash flow, net of debt, each weighted equally. The aggregate value of the performance shares granted to the named executive officers in 2006 (measured at grant date fair value) was $714,932. This represented approximately 6% of total long-term compensation awarded to the named executive officers in 2006, which represented the 75th percentile of the market. In February 2006, target grants of 15,000, 9,750, 6,800, 5,550 and 3,800 performance shares were made to Messrs. Keegan, Kramer, Rich, Harvie and Gingo, respectively, having the terms described above.
2006 Stock Option Grants
During 2006, the only stock option grants to named executive officers were reload grants made to Mr. Gingo and Mr. Rich. See Note 4 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table above. All options granted to named executive officers during 2006 were non-qualified stock options. Each unexercised stock option terminates automatically if the optionee ceases to be an employee of Goodyear or one of its subsidiaries for any reason, except that (a) upon retirement or disability of the optionee more than six months after the grant date, the stock option will become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until its expiration date, and (b) in the event of the death of the optionee more than six months after the grant thereof, each stock option will become exercisable and remain exercisable for up to three years after the date of death of the optionee.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
The following table sets forth information about outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2006.2008.
 
                                                                    
           Stock Awards            Stock Awards 
               Equity
                  Equity
   
               Incentive
                  Incentive
   
               Plan
 Equity
                Plan
 Equity
 
 Option Awards     Awards:
 Incentive
  Option Awards     Awards:
 Incentive
 
     Equity
         Number
 Plan
      Equity
         Number
 Plan
 
     Incentive
         of
 Awards:
      Incentive
         of
 Awards:
 
     Plan
       Market
 Unearned
 Market or
      Plan
       Market
 Unearned
 Market or
 
     Awards:
     Number
 Value of
 Shares,
 Payout
      Awards:
     Number
 Value of
 Shares,
 Payout
 
     Number of
     of Shares
 Shares or
 Units or
 Value of
      Number of
     of Shares
 Shares or
 Units or
 Value of
 
 Number of
 Number of
 Securities
     or Units
 Units of
 Other
 Unearned
  Number of
 Number of
 Securities
     or Units
 Units of
 Other
 Unearned
 
 Securities
 Securities
 Underlying
     of Stock
 Stock
 Rights
 Shares, Units or
  Securities
 Securities
 Underlying
     of Stock
 Stock
 Rights
 Shares, Units or
 
 Underlying
 Underlying
 Unexercised
 Option
   that Have
 that Have
 that Have
 Other
  Underlying
 Underlying
 Unexercised
 Option
   That Have
 That Have
 That Have
 Other
 
 Unexercised Options
 Unexercised Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Option
 Not
 Not
 Not
 Rights that
  Unexercised Options
 Unexercised Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Option
 Not
 Not
 Not
 Rights That
 
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Options
 Price
 Expiration
 Vested
 Vested
 Vested
 Have Not Vested
  Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Options
 Price
 Expiration
 Vested
 Vested
 Vested
 Have Not Vested
 
Name
 (#)(1) (#) (#) ($)(2) Date (#) ($)(3) (#) ($)(4)  (#)(1) (#) (#) ($)(2) Date (#) ($)(3) (#) ($)(4) 
Keegan  250,000         $18.25  10/3/2010          7,500   $157,425   1,089          $17.68  12/4/2010          20,140(14)  $120,236 
  80,000          17.68  12/4/2010                  35,000           7.94  12/3/2012                
  90,000          22.05  12/3/2011                  100,000           6.81  12/2/2013                
  35,000          7.94  12/3/2012                  28,548*          10.91  12/3/2012                
  50,000   50,000(5)      6.81  12/2/2013                  58,250           12.54  12/9/2014                
  28,548*         10.91  12/3/2012                  25,103*          13.62  12/3/2012                
  1,950   3,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                  33,134*          13.62  12/2/2013                
  56,300   112,600(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                  62,500   62,500(5)      17.15  12/6/2015                
  25,103*         13.62  12/3/2012                  24,122*          17.18  12/3/2012                
  33,134*         13.62  12/2/2013                  32,559*          17.18  12/2/2013                
  62,500   187,500(7)      17.15  12/6/2015                  48,941*          17.18  12/9/2014                
  24,122*         17.18  12/3/2012                  62,500   187,500(6)      24.71  2/27/2017                
  32,559*         17.18  12/2/2013                  172,537*          28.03  10/3/2010                
  48,941*         17.18  12/9/2014                  11,468*          27.74  12/4/2010                
  18,435*          27.74  10/3/2010                
  52,156*          25.26  12/4/2010                
  83,174*          25.26  12/3/2011                
  40,881*          25.26  12/9/2014                
  50,901*          25.26  12/6/2015                
  47,332*          27.02  12/6/2015                
      237,123(7)      26.74  2/21/2018                
      38,440(8)*      24.77  12/9/2014                
      1,978(8)*      24.77  12/6/2015                
Wells  12,500          $15.55  8/6/2012          5,889(14)  $35,157 
  13,000           7.94  12/3/2012                
  2,500           5.52  8/5/2013                
  8,268           6.81  12/2/2013                
  15,600           12.54  12/9/2014                
  752*          13.38  8/5/2013                
  1,089*          13.38  12/2/2013                
  10,125   3,375(5)      17.15  12/6/2015                
  667*          17.73  8/5/2013                
  2,970*          17.73  12/2/2013                
  3,375   10,125(6)      24.71  2/27/2017                
      12,333(7)      26.74  2/21/2018                
Kramer  24,000          $27.00  4/10/2010  103,492(12) $617,847   15,981(14)  $95,407 
  10,400           6.81  12/2/2013                
  2,861*          12.21  12/3/2012                
  11,250           12.54  12/9/2014                
  6,822*          13.83  12/2/2013                
  2,668*          13.83  12/3/2012                
  13,000   13,000(5)      17.15  12/6/2015                
  3,253*          17.35  8/6/2012                
  2,371*          17.35  12/3/2012                
  6,117*          17.35  12/2/2013                
  8,961*          17.35  12/9/2014                
  13,750   41,250(6)      24.71  2/27/2017                
  14,950*          28.03  12/3/2011                
  8,996*          28.03  12/4/2010                
  5,236*          28.03  8/6/2012                
  1,928*          28.03  12/3/2012                
  5,062*          28.03  12/2/2013                
  2,058*          25.33  12/3/2011                
  7,551*          25.33  12/9/2014                
  10,573*          25.33  12/6/2015                
  7,214*          27.93  12/9/2014                
  10,100*          27.93  12/6/2015                
      50,740(7)      26.74  2/21/2018                
Harvie  35,000          $32.00  12/6/2009          9,830(14)  $58,685 
  19,000           6.81  12/2/2013                
  6,087*          12.27  12/3/2012                


3134


                                   
                Stock Awards 
                      Equity
    
                      Incentive
    
                      Plan
  Equity
 
  Option Awards       Awards:
  Incentive
 
        Equity
             Number
  Plan
 
        Incentive
             of
  Awards:
 
        Plan
          Market
  Unearned
  Market or
 
        Awards:
       Number
  Value of
  Shares,
  Payout
 
        Number of
       of Shares
  Shares or
  Units or
  Value of
 
  Number of
  Number of
  Securities
       or Units
  Units of
  Other
  Unearned
 
  Securities
  Securities
  Underlying
       of Stock
  Stock
  Rights
  Shares, Units or
 
  Underlying
  Underlying
  Unexercised
  Option
    that Have
  that Have
  that Have
  Other
 
  Unexercised Options
  Unexercised Options
  Unearned
  Exercise
  Option
 Not
  Not
  Not
  Rights that
 
  Exercisable
  Unexercisable
  Options
  Price
  Expiration
 Vested
  Vested
  Vested
  Have Not Vested
 
Name
 (#)(1)  (#)  (#)  ($)(2)  Date (#)  ($)(3)  (#)  ($)(4) 
 
Kramer  24,000         $27.00  4/10/2010  10,000  $209,900   4,875   $102,326 
   12,000          17.68  12/4/2010                
   20,000          22.05  12/3/2011                
   7,500          15.55  8/6/2012                
   3,750          7.94  12/3/2012                
   10,400   10,400(5)      6.81  12/2/2013                
   2,861*         12.21  12/3/2012                
   1,950   3,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   9,300   18,600(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   6,822*         13.83  12/2/2013                
   2,668*         13.83  12/3/2012                
   13,000   39,000(7)      17.15  12/6/2015                
   3,253*         17.35  8/6/2012                
   2,371*         17.35  12/3/2012                
   6,117*         17.35  12/2/2013                
   8,961*         17.35  12/9/2014                
Rich  6,000          17.68  12/4/2010          3,400   71,366 
   4,000          28.73  6/5/2011                
   10,400          22.05  12/3/2011                
   6,250          7.94  12/3/2012                
   11,250   11,250(5)      6.81  12/2/2013                
   3,900   3,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   22,100   22,100(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   3,775*         13.36  12/2/2013                
   11,000   33,000(7)      17.15  12/6/2015                
   6,823*         17.35  12/2/2013                
      3,530(8)*      13.16  12/2/2013                
       13,710(8)*      13.16  12/3/2012                
Harvie  11,000          63.50  12/2/2007          2,775   58,247 
   13,000          57.25  11/30/2008                
   35,000          32.00  12/6/2009                
 �� 5,000          22.75  2/8/2010                
   28,000          17.68  12/4/2010                
   32,000          22.05  12/3/2011                
   8,000          7.94  12/3/2012                
   10,675   10,675(5)      6.81  12/2/2013                
   6,087*         12.27  12/3/2012                
   3,900   3,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   9,600   17,600(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                
   7,127*         13.36  12/2/2013                
   9,250   27,750(7)      17.15  12/6/2015                
   10,117*         17.35  12/3/2012                
   6,279*         17.35  12/2/2013                
   6,497*         17.35  12/9/2014                

32


                                                                    
           Stock Awards            Stock Awards 
               Equity
                  Equity
   
               Incentive
                  Incentive
   
               Plan
 Equity
                Plan
 Equity
 
 Option Awards     Awards:
 Incentive
  Option Awards     Awards:
 Incentive
 
     Equity
         Number
 Plan
      Equity
         Number
 Plan
 
     Incentive
         of
 Awards:
      Incentive
         of
 Awards:
 
     Plan
       Market
 Unearned
 Market or
      Plan
       Market
 Unearned
 Market or
 
     Awards:
     Number
 Value of
 Shares,
 Payout
      Awards:
     Number
 Value of
 Shares,
 Payout
 
     Number of
     of Shares
 Shares or
 Units or
 Value of
      Number of
     of Shares
 Shares or
 Units or
 Value of
 
 Number of
 Number of
 Securities
     or Units
 Units of
 Other
 Unearned
  Number of
 Number of
 Securities
     or Units
 Units of
 Other
 Unearned
 
 Securities
 Securities
 Underlying
     of Stock
 Stock
 Rights
 Shares, Units or
  Securities
 Securities
 Underlying
     of Stock
 Stock
 Rights
 Shares, Units or
 
 Underlying
 Underlying
 Unexercised
 Option
   that Have
 that Have
 that Have
 Other
  Underlying
 Underlying
 Unexercised
 Option
   That Have
 That Have
 That Have
 Other
 
 Unexercised Options
 Unexercised Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Option
 Not
 Not
 Not
 Rights that
  Unexercised Options
 Unexercised Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Option
 Not
 Not
 Not
 Rights That
 
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Options
 Price
 Expiration
 Vested
 Vested
 Vested
 Have Not Vested
  Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Options
 Price
 Expiration
 Vested
 Vest ed
 Vested
 Have Not Vested
 
Name
 (#)(1) (#) (#) ($)(2) Date (#) ($)(3) (#) ($)(4)  (#)(1) (#) (#) ($)(2) Date (#) ($)(3) (#) ($)(4) 
Gingo  5,600         $63.50  12/2/2007          1,900   $39,881 
Harvie (cont.)  10,750           12.54  12/9/2014                
  8,000          57.25  11/30/2008                  7,127*          13.36  12/2/2013                
  24,000          32.00  12/6/2009                  9,250   9,250(5)      17.15  12/6/2015                
  15,000          17.68  12/4/2010                  10,117*          17.35  12/3/2012                
  18,000          22.05  12/3/2011                  6,279*          17.35  12/2/2013                
  4,500          7.94  12/3/2012                  6,497*          17.35  12/9/2014                
  6,000   6,000(5)      6.81  12/2/2013                  9,250   27,750(6)      24.71  2/27/2017                
  3,505   3,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                  3,180*          27.74  12/3/2011                
  8,900   8,900(6)      12.54  12/9/2014                  1,763*          27.74  12/9/2014                
  3,894*         14.12  12/2/2013                  3,187*          27.74  12/4/2010                
  5,250   15,750(7)      17.15  12/6/2015                  4,407*          27.51  2/8/2010                
     9,254(9)*      14.81  12/3/2012                  24,190*          27.51  12/3/2011                
     3,802(9)*      14.81  12/2/2013                  2,285*          27.93  12/4/2010                
     334(9)*      14.81  12/9/2014                      33,311(7)      26.74  2/21/2018                
      16,132(9)*      26.85  12/4/2010                
      14,637(9)*      26.85  12/6/2015                
      13,642(9)*      26.85  12/9/2014                
      1,337(9)*      26.85  12/2/2013                
      4,743(9)*      26.85  12/3/2012                
de Bok  15,000          $24.09  12/31/2011  59,835(13) $357,215   10,385(14)  $61,998 
  13,500           7.94  12/3/2012                
  12,500           6.81  12/2/2013                
  17,680           12.54  12/9/2014                
  24,750   8,250(10)      15.23  10/4/2015                
  22,500   7,500(5)      17.15  12/6/2015                
  7,500   22,500(6)      24.71  2/27/2017                
      29,905(7)      26.74  2/21/2018                
      1,969(11)      26.74  12/2/2013                
Schmitz                            
 
 
*Represents the grant of a “reinvestmentreinvestment option, see Note 45 under Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for additional information.
 
(1)Because the options in this column were fully vested as of December 31, 2006,2008, the vesting schedules for such options are not reported.
 
(2)The exercise price of each option is equal to 100% of the per share fair market value of the common stockCommon Stock on the date granted (calculated as the average of the high and low stock price for such date). The option exercise priceand/or withholding tax obligations may be paid by delivery of shares of common stockCommon Stock valued at the fair market value on the date of exercise.
 
(3)Calculated by multiplying $20.99,$5.97, the closing market price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 29, 2006,31, 2008, by the number of restricted shares whichthat have not vested.
 
(4)Calculated by multiplying $20.99,$5.97, the closing market price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 29, 2006,31, 2008, by the number of performance shares whichthat have not vested.yet been earned.
 
(5)Vests in full on December 2, 2007.6, 2009.
 
(6)Vests as to one-half of the shares on December 9, 2007, and one-half of the shares on December 9, 2008.
(7)Vests as to one-third of the shares on each of December 6, 2007, December 6, 2008,February 27, 2009, February 27, 2010 and December 6, 2009.February 27, 2011.
(7)Vests as to one-fourth of the shares on each of February 21, 2009, February 21, 2010, February 21, 2011 and February 21, 2012.
 
(8)Vests in full on March 13, 2007.18, 2009.
 
(9)Vests in full on May 11, 2007.March 24, 2009.
(10)Vests in full on October 4, 2009.
(11)Vests in full on February 21, 2009.
(12)Except for 10,000 shares, these shares vest as to 50% of the shares on each of February 21, 2011 and February 21, 2012.
(13)Vests as to 50% of the shares on each of February 21, 2011 and February 21, 2012.

3335


(14)Vests, subject to the satisfaction of performance criteria, as to 10,000; 2,350; 7,925; 4,875; and 5,150 of the performance shares for Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Kramer, Harvie and de Bok, respectively, on December 31, 2009. The remaining performance shares vest, subject to the satisfaction of performance criteria, on December 31, 2010.
 
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
 
The following table sets forth certain information regarding option exercises by, and the vesting of stock awards for, the named executive officers during 2006.2008.
 
                                
 Option Awards     Option Awards Stock Awards 
 Number of Shares
   Stock Awards Number of Shares
   Number of Shares
   
 Acquired on
 Value Realized On
 Number of Shares
 Value Realized on
 Acquired on
 Value Realized On
 Acquired on
 Value Realized On
 
 Exercise
 Exercise
 Acquired on Vesting
 Vesting
 Exercise
 Exercise
 Vesting
 Vesting
 
Name
 (#) ($)(1) (#) ($) (#) ($)(1) (#) ($)(2) 
Keegan(3)              60,750  $731,448   15,000  $87,600 
Wells        2,600   15,184 
Kramer                    9,750   56,940 
Rich  23,996  $131,067       
Harvie(3)              69,300   853,350   5,550   32,412 
Gingo  19,895   140,745       
de Bok        5,500   32,120 
Schmitz            
 
 
(1)Represents the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of our common stockCommon Stock on the date of exercise.
(2)Represents the total value realized upon the vesting of performance share awards for the2006-2008 performance period, which were paid 50% in shares of Common Stock and 50% in cash.
(3)In accordance with the 2002 and 2005 Performance Plan, the named executive officersPlans, Messrs. Keegan and Harvie delivered previously owned shares in payment of the exercise price with respect to each option exercised in 2006.2008.
 
Pension Benefits
 
Goodyear’s Salaried Pension Plan (the “Salaried Plan”) is a defined benefit plan qualified under the Code in which manyU.S.-based salaried employees hired before January 1, 2005 participate, including the named executive officers.Messrs. Keegan, Wells, Kramer and Harvie. The Salaried Plan was designed to provide tax-qualified pension benefits for most Goodyear salaried employees. The Salaried Plan contains formulas based on age and service. These formulas are multiplied by five-year average compensation below and above a breakpoint ($47,10051,000 in 2006)2008), with the result representing a lump sum benefit under the plan. Compensation is held to the qualified plan limit under the Code, which is $220,000$230,000 for 2006.2008. A portion of the benefit may be paid by employee contributions. TheEffective December 31, 2007, all active participants in the Salaried Plan provides benefitsbecame vested and are entitled to participants who have at least five years of servicea benefit upon any termination of employment. Benefits are available on a five-year certain and continuous annuity basis at age 65, by converting the lump sum to an annuity. Annuity benefits payable to a participant who retires prior to age 65 are subject to a reduction for each month retirement precedes age 65. Benefits under the Salaried Plan are funded by an irrevocable tax-exempt trust. A named executive officer’s benefits
Participation in the Salaried Plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004. Subsequent hires participate in the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan, which is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan. Each participant in the Savings Plan receives an allocation each pay period equal to a percentage of compensation, with compensation held to the qualified plan limit under the Code. Accruals in the Salaried Plan are payable fromfrozen effective December 31, 2008. Starting January 1, 2009, Salaried Plan participants will receive allocations under the assets held byretirement contributions feature of the tax-exempt trust.Savings Plan.
Non-U.S. employees, such as Mr. de Bok, participate in neither the Salaried Plan nor the Savings Plan. Mr. de Bok participates in Goodyear’s Netherlands Pension Plan. He also participates in government-sponsored (but Company-funded) pension plans in The Netherlands and Belgium.
 
Goodyear also maintains athe Supplementary Pension Plan, (the “Supplementary Plan”), a non-qualified plan partially funded by a Rabbi Trust which provides additional retirement benefits to certain officers, including all of the named executive officers. The Supplementary Plan provides pension benefits to participants who retire with at least 30 years of service or retire after age 55 with at least ten years of service. The formula for an annuity benefit is based on a percentage determined using credited service (22% with 10 years, 38% with 20 years, 48% with 30 years and 54% with 40 years) times five-year average compensation above the breakpoint (noted above)previously), with compensation inclusive of base salary and annual bonus.incentive payments. The five-year average compensation uses the highest five


36


calendar years, not necessarily consecutive, out of the last ten years. Benefits are offset for the Salaried Plan, the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan, applicablenon-U.S. benefits and certain prior employer benefits. Under the Supplementary Plan, benefits payable to a participant who retires prior to age 62 are subject to a reduction of .4%0.4% for each month retirement precedes age 62. Participants may elect a lump sum payment of benefits under the Supplementary Plan for benefits accrued and vested prior to January 1, 2005, subject to the approval of Goodyear’s ERISA Appeals Committee in respect of benefits under the Supplementary Plan.2005. For benefits accrued or vested on or after December 31, 2004,January 1, 2005, a lump sum will be the default form of payment; however, thesepayment. These benefits cannot be distributed prior to six months after separation of service.service and are subject to the approval of Goodyear’s ERISA Appeals Committee.
 
We also maintain a non-qualified unfunded Excess Benefit Plan that pays an additional pension benefit over that paid under the Salaried Plan if a participant does not meet the eligibility requirements of the Supplementary Plan. The additional benefit is equal to the amount a participant would have received from the Salaried Plan but does not because of the limitations imposed by the Code on pension benefitscompensation under qualified plans. This plan is provided to allow the continuation of benefits from the qualified plan to individuals whose income exceeds the Code guidelines for qualified plans. Distribution of amounts earned and vested prior to January 1, 2005, will be paid out in the same manner as the Salaried Plan unless otherwise elected by the participant at least 12 months prior to termination or severance. Distributions for amounts earned or vested on or after December 21, 2004,January 1, 2005, will be paid out in a lump sumsum. Payments to participants considered in the top 50 wage earners of the Company are paid out six months after termination of service. For participants hired after December 31, 2004, there is a corresponding defined contribution excess plan that mirrors the retirement contributions feature of the Savings Plan. Like the qualified plans, effective December 31, 2008 accruals were frozen under the defined benefit Excess Benefit Plan and all affected participants began receiving defined contribution allocations.


34


 
The Pension Benefits table below shows for the named executive officers the number of years of credited service, present value of accumulated benefit and payments during the last fiscal year, for each defined benefit plan.
 
The “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” is the lump-sum value as of December 31, 2006,2008, of the expected pension benefit payable at age 62 that was earned as of December 31, 2006.2008. That is, the benefit reflects service and compensation only through 2006,2008, not projected for future years. The benefit payment at age 62 is assumed to be the lump sum form. The present value is measured using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes, with the exception of the commencement age. The commencement age is assumed to be 62 because that is the age at which the Supplementary Plan benefit is payable with no reduction for early retirement. Because Mr. Harvie is older than 62, his benefit is assumed to commence on January 1, 2007.2009.
 
Generally, a participant’s years of credited service under the Supplementary Plan are based on the years an employee participates in the Salaried Plan. However, in certain cases, credit for service prior to participation in the Salaried Plan is granted. Such cases include service with a predecessor employer. Mr. Keegan’s, Mr. Kramer’s and Mr. Harvie’s years of credited service include their years of service with prior employers. The benefits paid to Mr. Kramer and Mr. Harvie under the Supplementary Plan will be reduced by amounts they are entitled to receive under the pension plans maintained by their prior employers. Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement states that his credited service under the Supplementary Plan will be adjusted at retirement so that the total value of all pension benefits received from Goodyear and his prior employer will be equivalent to a full-career Goodyear pension. The actual service adjustment will depend on his retirement date and his final average earnings. The Supplementary Plan benefit is not reduced by the prior employer benefit because this prior benefit is already considered in the determination of the service adjustment. Due to these service grants, the present value of accumulated benefit in the Pension Benefits table is $5,882,189$10,469,157 higher for Mr. Keegan, $518,845$789,308 higher for Mr. Kramer and $1,053,749$1,184,364 higher for Mr. Harvie. Mr. Wells did not receive any additional years of credited service.
 
Mr. Keegan Mr. Harvie and Mr. GingoHarvie are each eligible for immediate commencement of the benefit from both the Supplementary Plan and the Salaried Plan as of December 31, 2006.2008. Mr. Wells is eligible for immediate commencement of the benefit from the Salaried Plan as of December 31, 2008, and will be eligible to receive a benefit from the Supplementary Plan if he remains employed until 2020. Mr. Kramer is eligible for immediate commencement of the benefit from the Salaried Plan as of December 31, 2006,2008, and will be eligible to receive a benefit from the Supplementary Plan if he remains employed until 2016. Mr. Rich is eligible for immediate commencement of the benefit from the Salaried Plan as of December 31, 2006, andde Bok will be eligible to receive a benefit from the Supplementary Plan if he remains employed until 2010.2017.
 
               
      Present Value of
 Payments
    Number of Years
 Accumulated Benefit
 During Last
    Credited Service
 ($)
 Fiscal Year
Name
 Plan Name (#) (1) ($)
 
Keegan Supplementary Pension Plan  21.3  $8,888,688    
  Salaried Pension Plan  6.3   191,254    
               
Kramer Supplementary Pension Plan  20.4   800,649    
  Salaried Pension Plan  6.8   82,959    
               
Rich Supplementary Pension Plan  6.3   425,744    
  Salaried Pension Plan  6.3   134,182    
               
Harvie Supplementary Pension Plan  31.5   2,858,370    
  Salaried Pension Plan  11.5   350,148    
               
Gingo Supplementary Pension Plan  40.6   2,863,310    
  Salaried Pension Plan  40.6   1,019,614    
For Mr. de Bok, the Pension Benefits table shows the benefits payable under the Supplementary Plan and Goodyear’s Netherlands Pension Plan. The Netherlands Pension Plan provides an annuity benefit based on career average earnings. This benefit is an offset to the Supplementary Plan benefit. The present value of the Netherlands Pension Plan benefit is determined based on the assumptions used for financial reporting of the Netherlands


37


Pension Plan as of December 31, 2008, with the exception that the commencement age is taken to be 62. The Supplementary Plan value is based on the U.S. financial reporting assumptions, as discussed above. Mr. de Bok is currently vested in his benefit from the Netherlands Pension Plan but is not yet eligible to commence the benefit. In addition to the offset for the Netherlands Pension Plan, the Supplementary Plan present value also will be offset for the value of Company contributions to the governmental plans in Belgium and The Netherlands.
               
          Payments
 
    Number of Years
  Present Value of
  During Last
 
    Credited Service
  Accumulated Benefit
  Fiscal Year
 
Name
 Plan Name (#)  ($)(1)  ($) 
 
Keegan Supplementary Pension Plan  26.3  $17,521,705  $ 
  Salaried Pension Plan  8.3   257,397    
Wells Supplementary Pension Plan  6.4   175,025    
  Salaried Pension Plan  6.4   69,820    
Kramer Supplementary Pension Plan  22.4   1,453,390    
  Salaried Pension Plan  8.8   104,406    
Harvie Supplementary Pension Plan  33.5   3,483,827    
  Salaried Pension Plan  13.5   421,116    
de Bok(2) Supplementary Pension Plan  7.0   237,547    
  Netherlands Pension Plan  7.0   222,384    
Schmitz(3) Supplementary Pension Plan         
 
 
(1)All amounts shown are estimates as of December 31, 2006;2008; the actual benefits to be paid to the named executive officers will be based on their credited service, compensation, and other factors at the time of their retirement.
(2)The amounts for Mr. de Bok were converted from euros to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at December 31, 2008 of €1 = $1.40.
(3)Mr. Schmitz participated in the Supplementary Plan prior to his departure from the Company. Mr. Schmitz will not receive any benefits under the Supplementary Plan since he was not eligible for retirement at the time of his departure. He was also not eligible for an Excess Benefit Plan benefit.
 
The amounts set forth in the table above are based on the following assumptions:
 
 • the measurement date is December 31, 20062008
 
 • the form of payment is a lump sum (annuity for Mr. de Bok’s Netherlands pension)
 
 • the interest rate used to calculate the Supplementary Plan lump sum payment:
 
 • Salaried Plan: 5.25%Benefits commencing in 2009:  4.00% (Messrs. Keegan and Harvie)
 
 • benefitsBenefits commencing in 2007 under 2013 or later:  5.50% (Messrs. Wells, Kramer and de Bok)
• the Supplementaryinterest rate used to calculate the Salaried Plan (Harvie, Gingo): 3.50%lump sum payment:
• Benefits commencing in 2009:  6.20% (Messrs. Keegan and Harvie)
 
 • benefitsBenefits commencing2008-2009 under the Supplementary Plan (Keegan): 4.75%
• benefits commencing 2010 in 2012 or later under the Supplementary Plan (Kramer, Rich): 5.75%later:  6.50% (Messrs. Wells and Kramer)


35


 
 • the mortality assumptions used to calculate the accumulated benefitlump sum are those set forth in Revenue-RulingRevenue Ruling2001-622007-67, as updated by IRS Notice2008-85 for the Salaried Plan, and those set forth inUP-1984 Mortality for the Supplementary Plan (a modified version of the Prognosetafel2005-2050 mortality table is used to determine the present value of Mr. de Bok’s Netherlands pension)
 
 • the discount rate used to determine the present value of the accumulated benefit is 5.75%6.50% (5.75% for Mr. de Bok’s Netherlands pension)
 
 • the benefit commencement age is 62 (or, if older, age at the measurement date)
 
 • the accumulated benefit is calculated based on credited service and pay as of December 31, 20062008


38


 
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
 
The Goodyear Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that provides named executive officers and other highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer their base salary and bonus payments under the Performance Recognition Plan awards. Amounts deferred are treated as compensation in the year deferred for purposes of calculating accrued benefits under the Salaried Plan, but are treated as compensation in the year earned for purposes of calculating benefits under other benefit plans.Plan. Deferred amounts may be invested in one of five investment alternatives.alternatives or, with respect to payments under the Performance Recognition Plan, Goodyear stock units. Four of these investment alternatives are mutual funds managed by The Northern Trust Company, and currently include a money market fund, a bond fund, an equity index fund, and a balanced fund. The average interest rate payable with respect to funds invested in the Northern Trust money market fund was 4.72%1.91% for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008. The fifth investment vehicle is an aggressive growth fund managed by American Century Investments. Investment elections among the five investment alternatives may be changed daily. Deferrals of payments under the Performance Recognition Plan into Goodyear stock units will result in a 20% premium paid in stock units that, beginning for deferral elections made after January 1, 2008, will vest in one year. There is no guaranteed return associated with any deferral. Distribution of deferred amounts may begin after separation of service or in a selected number of years ranging from 1one to 20. Payment of deferred amounts will be in a lump sum or up to 15 annual installments, as elected at the time of deferral. Redeferral is allowed only if elected one (1) year prior to the scheduled payout and the new deferral does not commence for at least five (5) years after the originally scheduled date of distribution.
The deferred compensation plan is unfunded. For 2006, Mr. Rich is the only named executive officer who made deferrals under the plan. In 2006, Mr. Rich deferred his 2005 Performance Recognition Plan bonus into Goodyear Any stock units and received a 20% premium in stock units as provided in the Deferred Compensation Plan. There is no premium or guaranteed return associated with the deferral. The stock units will beare converted to shares of Goodyear common stockCommon Stock and paiddistributed to Mr. Rich on the first business dayparticipant in January of the thirdfourth year following the end of the plan year under which the award was earned.
 
The Deferred Compensation Plan is unfunded. The following table sets forth certain information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation of the named executive officers.
 
                                        
         Aggregate
         Aggregate
 
 Executive
 Registrant
 Aggregate
 Aggregate
 Balance
 Executive
 Registrant
 Aggregate
 Aggregate
 Balance
 
 Contributions in
 Contributions in
 Earnings in
 Withdrawals/
 at Last
 Contributions in
 Contributions in
 Earnings in
 Withdrawals/
 at Last
 
 Last FY
 Last FY
 Last FY
 Distributions
 FYE
 Last FY
 Last FY
 Last FY
 Distributions
 FYE
 
Name
 ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) ($) ($) ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) ($) ($) 
Keegan        $82,178      $609,827         $(238,653)     $404,107 
Wells               
Kramer        8,493      113,880         (22,038)     100,460 
Rich $612,964  $122,593   321,659  $412,632   1,264,298 
Harvie                              
Gingo        8,715      55,948 
de Bok               
Schmitz(4) $238,146  $47,629   (223,151)     62,624 
 
 
(1)Represents deferral in 20062008 of base salary and/or amounts awarded under the Performance Recognition Plan in respect of performance in 2005.2007. Mr. Schmitz deferred a portion of his 2007 Performance Recognition Plan payment into Goodyear stock units. The entirefull amount of Mr. Rich’s awardSchmitz’s 2007 payment is reflected in respectthe “Bonus” column of 2005 was deferred by Mr. Rich in 2006 into stock units pursuant to the DeferredSummary Compensation Plan.Table on page 30.
 
(2)Represents stock units awarded to Mr. RichSchmitz in an amount equal to 20% of the amount Mr. RichSchmitz deferred pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2006.2008. All of this amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Stock Awards” column.
 
(3)No portion of these earnings were included in the Summary Compensation Table because the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan does not provide for “above-market” or preferential earnings as defined in applicable SEC rules.Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.
(4)Mr. Schmitz received company contributions to his defined contribution plan accounts during 2008, but all of those contributions were forfeited upon his departure from the Company and, therefore, are not reflected in the table.


36


 
Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control
 
We provide for the payment of severance and certain other benefits to our named executive officers upon certain types of terminations of employment, as described below.
 
“Double Trigger” SeveranceContinuity Plan
 
The Goodyear Employee SeveranceContinuity Plan (the “Severance Plan”) provides certain severance benefits whento certain of our salaried employees, areincluding our named executive officers, if their employment is terminated induring certain circumstancesperiods before or within two years following a change in control. Our Severancechange-in-control of the Company.


39


The Continuity Plan is a “Double Trigger” plan, meaning that there is no payment unless a change in control occursand there is a subsequent termination. The Severance Plan coversdivides our salaried employees into three groups: Tier 1, Tier 2 and employeesTier 3. Tier 1 generally includes all of our domestic subsidiarieselected officers, including the named executive officers, and other employees who participate in the Salaried Plan. Under the Severanceour Executive Performance Plan; Tier 2 generally includes all salaried employees who participate in our Performance Recognition Plan if aother than Tier 1 employees; and Tier 3 generally includes all otherU.S.-based, full-time salaried employee covered byemployees who participate in our Savings Plan. The Continuity Plan provides the plan who has at least one year of service is involuntarily terminated (as definedfollowing benefits to salaried employees in the Severance Plan) within two years following a change in control (as defined below), the employee is entitled to receive severance pay equal to the sum of (a) two weeks’ pay for each full year of service and (b) one month’s pay for each $12,000 of total annual compensation (which includes base salary plus incentive compensation received during the 12 months prior to termination). The severance pay may be paid in a lump sum or, at the employee’s election, on a regular salary payroll interval basis. Severance pay may not exceed two times the employee’s total annual compensation. In addition, medical benefits and basic life insurance coverage will be provided on the same basis as in effect prior to termination, for the same number of weeks for which severance pay is provided. A change in control is deemed to occur upon the acquisition of 35% or more of our common stock by any “acquiring person” or any change in the composition of the Board with the effect that a majority of the directors are not “continuing directors.”tier:
• Tier 1.  A Tier 1 employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Continuity Plan if the employee’s employment is terminated involuntarily without “Cause” or by the employee for “Good Reason” (as such terms are defined below) during certain periods before or within two years following a Change in Control or a Hostile Change in Control (as such terms are defined below) if the employee executes a release and agrees not to compete with the Company or solicit its employees for a period of two years. Tier 1 employees will generally receive: (a) a cash severance payment equal to twice the sum of the employee’s base salary, target annual incentive under the Performance Recognition Plan, and target long-term cash incentives granted under the Executive Performance Plan for any uncompleted performance cycles; (b) two additional years of service under the Supplementary Plan; (c) continued health care and life insurance coverage for up to two years; (d) outplacement services and reimbursement for legal fees incurred with certain claims made under the Continuity Plan; and (e) a gross up for any excise taxes incurred in connection with certain “parachute” payments arising under the Code. In addition, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Keegan), Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Wells), Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (Mr. Harvie), and Senior Vice President, Human Resources can terminate their employment for any reason during the thirteenth month following a Change in Control or Hostile Change in Control and, upon executing a release and agreeing to comply with certain covenants, receive the benefits described above.
• Tier 2.  A Tier 2 employee is eligible to receive benefits under the Continuity Plan if the employee’s employment is terminated involuntarily without “Cause” or by the employee for “Good Reason” during certain periods before or within two years following a Change in Control or Hostile Change in Control, and the employee executes a release and agrees not to compete with the Company or solicit its employees for a period of two years (following a Hostile Change in Control) or one year (following a Change in Control or Potential Change in Control (as such term is defined below)). In the event of a Hostile Change in Control, the Tier 2 employee generally will receive: (a) a cash severance payment equal to twice the sum of the employee’s base salary and target annual incentive under the Performance Recognition Plan; (b) continued health care and life insurance coverage for a period of up to two years; and (c) outplacement services. In the event of a Change in Control or Potential Change in Control, the Tier 2 employee generally will receive: (a) a cash severance payment equal to the sum of the employee’s base salary and target annual incentive under the Performance Recognition Plan; (b) continued health care and life insurance coverage for up to one year; and (c) outplacement services.
• Tier 3.  The Plan generally provides Tier 3 employees whose employment is terminated involuntarily without “Cause” or by the employee for “Good Reason” within two years following a Hostile Change in Control with a cash severance payment equal to twice the sum of the employee’s base salary and target annual incentive.
 
It is our expectation that should a change in controlchange-in-control transaction occur, many of our employees would retain their jobs and continue to be employed by the surviving company and, therefore, would not be entitled to benefits under the SeveranceContinuity Plan.
 
As used in the Continuity Plan:
Cause” means (1) the continued failure by an eligible employee to substantially perform the employee’s duties with the Company (other than any such failure resulting from the employee’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness), (2) the engaging by the employee in conduct which is demonstrably injurious to the Company, monetarily or otherwise, (3) the employee committing any felony or any crime involving fraud, breach of trust or misappropriation or (4) any breach or violation of any agreement relating to the employee’s employment with the Company where the Company, in its discretion, determines that such breach or violation materially and adversely affects the Company.
A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if the event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs shall have occurred:
(1) any person is or becomes the beneficial owner (as defined inRule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company other than securities acquired by virtue of the exercise of a conversion or similar privilege or right unless the security being so converted or pursuant to


40


which such right was exercised was itself acquired directly from the Company) representing 20% or more of (A) the then outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company or (B) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; or
(2) the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of directors then serving on the Board of Directors (the “Incumbent Board”): individuals who, on April 10, 2007, constitute the Board of Directors and any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including, without limitation, a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company) whose appointment or election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors on April 10, 2007 or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended; or
(3) there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation pursuant to which (A) the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation will continue to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock, and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, (B) no person will become the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof representing 20% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock or the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to such merger or consolidation) and (C) individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board will constitute at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation (or any parent thereof) resulting from such merger or consolidation; or
(4) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, (A) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock, and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of which (or of any parent of such entity) is owned by stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale, (B) in which (or in any parent of such entity) no person is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock resulting from such sale or disposition or the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to such sale or disposition) and (C) in which (or in any parent of such entity) individuals who were members of the Incumbent Board will constitute at least a majority of the members of the board of directors.
Good Reason” means the occurrence, without the affected eligible employee’s written consent, of any of the following:
(1) the assignment to the employee of duties that are materially inconsistent with the employee’s position (including, without limitation, offices or titles), authority, duties or responsibilities immediately prior to a Potential Change in Control or in the absence thereof, a Change in Control or a Hostile Change in Control (other than pursuant to a transfer or promotion to a position of equal or enhanced responsibility or authority) or any other action by the Company which results in a diminution in such position, authority, duties or responsibilities, excluding for this purpose an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the employee, provided, however, that any such assignment or diminution that is primarily a result of the Company no longer being a publicly traded entity or becoming a subsidiary or division of another entity shall not be deemed “Good Reason” for purposes of the Continuity Plan, except that an employee shall have Good Reason if the Company is no longer a publicly traded entity and, immediately before the Change in Control or Hostile Change in Control that caused the Company no longer to be a publicly traded entity, substantially all of the employee’s duties and responsibilities related to public investors or government agencies that regulate publicly traded entities;


41


(2) change in the location of such employee’s principal place of business by more than 50 miles when compared to the employee’s principal place of business immediately before a Potential Change in Control, or in the absence thereof, a Change in Control or a Hostile Change in Control;
(3) a material reduction in the Employee’s annual base salary or annual incentive opportunity from that in effect immediately before a Potential Change in Control, or in the absence thereof, a Change in Control or a Hostile Change in Control;
(4) a material increase in the amount of business travel required of the employee when compared to the amount of business travel required immediately before a Potential Change in Control, or in the absence thereof, a Change in Control or a Hostile Change in Control; and
(5) the failure by any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the businessand/or assets of the Company, to expressly assume and agree to perform the Continuity Plan in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no succession had taken place.
“Hostile Change in Control”means a Change in Control that a majority of the Incumbent Board has not determined to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
A “Potential Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if the event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs shall have occurred:
(1) the Company enters into an agreement, the consummation of which would result in the occurrence of a Change in Control;
(2) the Company or any person publicly announces an intention to take or to consider taking actions which, if consummated, would constitute a Change in Control;
(3) any person becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such person any securities acquired directly from the Company other than securities acquired by virtue of the exercise of a conversion or similar privilege or right unless the security being so converted or pursuant to which such right was exercised was itself acquired directly from the Company) representing 20% or more of either the then outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company or the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or
(4) the Board adopts a resolution to the effect that a Potential Change in Control has occurred.
The description above is meant only to be a summary of the provisions of the Continuity Plan. The Continuity Plan was filed as Exhibit 10.17 to our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2009.
Other Severance Benefits
 
In addition to benefits provided under the SeveranceContinuity Plan, under appropriate circumstances, such as reductions in force or elimination of positions, we may provide severance benefits to executive officers, including the named executive officers, whose employment terminates prior to retirement. In determining whether to provide such benefits and in what amount, we consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including length of service, circumstances of the termination, the named executive officer’s contributions to companyour objectives, and other relevant factors. When we provide such benefits, typically the amount of severance is the equivalent of six to 18 months of base salary plus an amount based on the individual’s target bonusannual incentive payment then in effect and health, welfare and other benefit payments over an equivalent period. The severance payment may be paid in a lump sum or in installments. We also may provide limited outplacement and personal financial planning services to eligible named executive officers following their termination. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves any such severance benefits.
 
CEO Employment Agreement
 
Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement provides for the payment of severance compensation if we terminate his employment without “cause” or if Mr. Keegan terminates his employment for “good reason,” as such terms are defined in such agreement.below. Severance compensation consists of (i)(a) two times the sum of Mr. Keegan’s annual base salary and target bonusannual incentive payment then in effect, plus (ii)(b) the pro rata portion of Mr. Keegan’s target bonusannual incentive payment for the then-current fiscal year. This severance compensation is not payable if, and to the extent that, Mr. Keegan receives benefits under the SeveranceContinuity Plan. Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Keegan is subject to any excise taxes resulting from a severance payment (including a change in control) he is entitled to receive an additional amount sufficient to cover the amount of any such excise or related taxes. If severance compensation is paid to Mr. Keegan under the agreement, the agreement restricts Mr. Keegan from participating in any business that competes with us for a


42


period of two years. TheIn December 2008, Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement was amended to extend the term of thisthe agreement endsfrom February 28, 2009 until February 28, 2012 and to make other minor changes required in order to comply with Section 409A of the Code.
As used in Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement, “Cause” means: (1) a significant violation by Mr. Keegan of the Company’s policies, grossly incompetent performance or other gross misconduct on his part, (2) a material breach by Mr. Keegan of the terms of the employment agreement, (3) Mr. Keegan’s prolonged or repeated absence from duty without consent of the Board of Directors for reasons other than his incapacity due to illness, (4) Mr. Keegan’s acceptance of employment with another employer, or (5) Mr. Keegan’s conviction of a crime other than minor traffic offenses; and “Good Reason” means: (1) a material breach by the Company of the terms of the employment agreement, or (2) a material reduction by the Company of Mr. Keegan’s titles, positions, duties,and/or authority.
Additionally, if Mr. Keegan seeks to terminate his employment for Good Reason, he must provide the Board of Directors thirty days advance written notice of his intention to terminate his employment for Good Reason and shall only be entitled to terminate his employment for Good Reason if the Company fails to cure the alleged Good Reason to his reasonable satisfaction during thatthirty-day period.
The description above is meant only to be a summary of the provisions of Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement. The employment agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.16 to our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28,18, 2009.
 
Quantification of Termination Benefits
 
The tables below show amounts that would be payable to each of the current named executive officers, as of December 31, 2006,2008, upon the termination of their employment in the circumstances indicated in each column of the tables. The amounts shown are calculated on the assumption that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2006.2008. Other assumptions used to determine such amounts are described below.
 
Performance Recognition Plan.  The amounts shown in the tables for annual cash bonusincentive under the Performance Recognition Plan are the amounts earned under Performance Recognition Plan bonus awards for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008. Such amounts are payable at the normal time that payouts are made for 2006 bonus2008 awards


37


under the Performance Recognition Plan. The “Termination for Cause” scenario assumes no payout because the plan gives the Compensation Committee and the CEO (for named executive officers other than the CEO) and the Compensation Committee (for the CEO) discretion to eliminate or reduce performance awards prior to payout.payment.
 
Severance Payments.  AmountsFor the current named executive officers other than Mr. Keegan, amounts shown in the column captioned “Termination Without Cause” equal 18 months of the named executive officer’s base salary and target annual incentive payments, which represents the maximum amount of such severance paid by Goodyear historically in this scenario. (See “Other Severance Benefits” above.) InFor Mr. Keegan, amounts shown in the column captioned “Termination Without Cause/For Good Reason” are calculated in accordance with the terms of the Severance Plan, theMr. Keegan’s employment agreement. The amounts shown in the column captioned “Involuntary Termination Within Two Years of Change in Control” equalare calculated in accordance with the sumterms of (a) two weeks’ pay for each full year of service and (b) one month’s pay for each $12,000 of total annual compensation (which includes base salary plus incentive compensation received during the 12 months prior to termination), subject to an overall limit of two times annual compensation, as well as the estimated cost of medical benefits and basic life insurance coverage on the same basis as in effect prior to termination for the same period.Continuity Plan. (See “Continuity Plan” above.)
 
Performance Shares.  The amounts shown in the tables for performance shares are divided equally between cash and equity, and represent the value (calculated based on a per share price of $20.99,$5.97, the closing market price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 29, 2006)31, 2008) of all outstanding unvested performance shares as of December 31, 2006. For2008. With respect to awards to Mr. Harvie (who is the only named executive officer eligible for retirement under the Performance Plans) of performance shares with performance periods ending after December 31, 2006,2008, this amount includes a pro rata portion, through December 31, 2006,2008, of the value of such shares based on the estimated vesting with respect to such awards (e.g., there is no payment related to unvested performance shares).awards. In the event of termination for cause, it is assumed the Compensation Committee would exercise its discretion to cancel any outstanding awards.
 
Executive Performance Plan.  The amounts shown in the tables for cash payouts under the Executive Performance Plan are the estimated payouts under all outstanding Executive Performance Plan grants as of December 31, 2006.2008. For grants with performance periods ending on December 31, 2006,2008, the amount shown includes the amount actually earned under such grants, and for grants with performance periods ending after December 31, 2006,2008, the amount shown includes a pro rata portion, through December 31, 2006,2008, of the total amount payable under such grants based on the estimated future payouts under such grants as of December 31, 2006.2008. Under the Executive Performance Plan, an employee whose employment is terminated is entitled to a pro ratedprorated payout for uncompleted performance periods only if such employee was eligible for retirement as of the date of termination; since Messrs. Rich and Kramer were not eligible for retirement as of December 31, 2006, the amounts shown for them only cover the completed2004-2006 performance period.termination. Amounts are payable at the normal time that payouts are made for outstanding grants under


43


the Executive Performance Plan. The “Termination for Cause” scenario assumes no payout because the planExecutive Performance Plan gives the Compensation Committee and the CEO (for named executive officers other than the CEO) discretion to eliminate or reduce performance awards prior to payment.
 
Stock Options.  The Performance Plans provide that unexercised stock options terminate automatically if the optionee ceases to be an employee of Goodyear or one of its subsidiaries for any reason, except that (a) upon retirement or disability of the optionee more than six months after the grant date, the stock option will become immediately exercisable and remain exercisable until the earlier of five years or its expiration date, and (b) in the event of the death of the optionee more than six months after the grant thereof, each stock option will become exercisable and remain exercisable for up tountil the earlier of three years after the date of death of the optionee.optionee or its expiration date. For these purposes, resignations, terminations without cause, and involuntary terminations within two years followingupon a change in control are treated like a retirement if the employee is eligible for retirement as of the date of termination. Accordingly, the amounts shown in the tables under those scenarios for stock options isare thein-the-money value of all outstanding unvested stock options as of December 31, 20062008 (calculated based on a per share price of $20.99,$5.97, the closing market price of our common stockCommon Stock on December 29, 2006)31, 2008). In the event of a termination for cause, it is assumed that the Compensation Committee would exercise its discretion to cancel any outstanding unvested stock options.
 
Supplementary Pension Plan.Retirement Benefits.  The amounts shown intables below show the tables for Supplementary Pension Plan are the amountsadditional pension benefits that would be payable to the named executive officer under such plan if the named executive officer’s employment was terminated on December 31, 2006,2008, and suchthat named executive officer was eligible for retirementvested in the benefit as of suchthat date. Such amountMr. Keegan and Mr. Harvie have amounts payable from the Supplementary Plan because they were eligible to retire at December 31, 2008. The Change in Control column shows the amounts payable with two additional years of credited service under the Supplementary Plan, as provided in the Continuity Plan. Mr. Wells and Mr. Kramer were not yet vested in a Supplementary Plan benefit and would instead receive a benefit from the Excess Benefit Plan. The amounts shown in the Pension Benefits Table would be payable in a lump sum form at age 62. The amounts shown in the tables below for the Supplementary Plan and the Excess Benefit Plan are the additional amounts that would be payable, together with the amounts shown in the Pension Benefits Table, in lump sum form six months after termination of employment. Noemployment at December 31, 2008. The Salaried Plan values shown in the Pension Benefits Table would be payable in lump sum form at age 62. The amounts are shown in the tables below for Messrs.Mr. Keegan, Mr. Wells, Mr. Kramer and Rich because they wereMr. Harvie under the Salaried Plan are the additional amounts that would be payable immediately, together with the amounts shown in the Pension Benefits Table, in lump sum form after termination of employment at December 31, 2008. Mr. de Bok is not yet vested in a Supplementary Plan benefit and is not eligible for retirement asto participate in the Excess Benefit Plan or the Salaried Plan. For Mr. de Bok, the Pension Benefits Table shows the present value of December 31, 2006.the accrued benefit under the Netherlands Pension Plan.
 
Other Benefits.  The amounts shown for other benefits include payments for outplacement services (only in the case of termination without cause and involuntary termination within two years of a change in control, and in each case capped at $25,000 per year)$25,000), personal financial planning services (in the amount of $9,000), payment of accrued vacation, and reimbursement of COBRA payments for a period of 18 months following termination of employment (only in the case of termination without cause and involuntary termination within two years of a change in control). In the case of Messrs. Harvie, health care and Gingo, these amounts also include retiree life insurance benefits.coverage, and reimbursement for legal fees.
For information regarding the actual payments made to Mr. Schmitz, our former Chief Financial Officer, as a result of the termination of his employment effective October 16, 2008, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Severance andChange-in-Control Benefits” at page 26 and the Summary Compensation Table at page 30.


3844


Robert J. Keegan (Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President)
 
                                        
         Involuntary
         Involuntary
 
         Termination
         Termination
 
   Termination
     Within Two
   Termination
     Within Two
 
   Without
     Years of
   Without
     Years of
 
   Cause/For
     Change in
   Cause/For
     Change in
 
 Resignation
 Good Reason
 Termination For
   Control
 Resignation
 Good Reason
 Termination For
   Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1) (2) Cause Retirement (3) (1) (2) Cause Retirement (3) 
Annual Cash Bonus under Performance Recognition Plan  $2,244,000*  $2,244,000*     $2,244,000*  $2,244,000*
Annual Cash Incentive under Performance Recognition Plan $* $* $  $* $*
Cash Severance     5,700,000         10,663,080      6,160,000         32,138,000 
Performance Shares-Cash Component  52,475   52,475      52,475   314,850   43,800   43,800      43,800   330,016 
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  15,400,000  15,400,000     15,400,000  15,400,000  4,600,000ˆ  4,600,000ˆ     4,600,000   4,600,000ˆ
           
Total Cash
  17,696,475   23,396,475      17,696,475   28,621,930   4,643,800   10,803,800      4,643,800   37,068,016 
           
Equity
                                   
Restricted Stock                              
Performance Shares  52,475   52,475      52,475   314,850   43,800   43,800      43,800   330,016 
Stock Options  2,413,425   2,413,425      2,413,425   2,413,425                
           
Total Equity
  2,465,900   2,465,900      2,465,900   2,728,275   43,800   43,800      43,800   330,016 
           
Retirement Benefits
                                   
Salaried Pension Plan  197,144   197,144   $197,144   197,144   197,144 
Supplementary Pension Plan  11,512,525   11,512,525   11,512,525   11,512,525   11,512,525 
Excess Benefits Plan               
Salaried Pension Plan(4)  9,128   9,128   9,128   9,128   9,128 
Supplementary Pension Plan(4)  424,131   424,131   424,131   424,131   1,245,809 
Excess Benefit Plan               
Retiree Medical                              
           
Total Retirement Benefits
  11,709,669   11,709,669   11,709,669   11,709,669   11,709,669   433,259   433,259   433,259   433,259   1,254,937 
Vested Deferred Compensation
  609,827   609,827   609,827   609,827   609,827 
           
Vested Deferred Compensation(5)
               
Other Benefits
  148,739   172,799   110,577   148,739   172,799   136,269   178,045   136,269   136,269   193,597 
Excise TaxGross-Up
  N/A   5,525,426(4)  N/A   N/A   7,731,589(4)              12,055,188 
                      
Total
 $32,630,610  $43,880,096  $12,430,073  $32,630,610  $51,574,089  $5,257,128  $11,458,904  $569,528  $5,257,128  $50,901,754 
           
 
 
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
 
ˆ$8,000,000 of thisThis amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. The remaining portion
(1)In the event of death or disability, an additional $4,249,622 would be payable,paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards,” and “Equity— Performance Shares,” if at all, only upon achievement of the applicable targets and following the completion of the applicable three year performance period.
(1)Also includes death and disability.
 
(2)In accordance with Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement, in connection with a termination without cause or for good reason, Mr. Keegan is entitled to a cash severance payment equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and target bonus.annual incentive payment.
 
(3)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity— Performance Shares” and “Equity— Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination.
 
(4)In accordance withThe Pension Benefits Table (on page 38) shows the present value of the accumulated benefit under the Salaried Plan and the Supplementary Plan, calculated based on the assumptions set forth following that table. The amounts presented in this table reflect the additional amounts payable to Mr. Keegan’s employment agreement, this is an estimated amount for excise taxesKeegan due to the difference between the assumptions used in preparing the Pension Benefits Table and related gross-upthe assumptions used assuming a triggering event occurred on December 31, 2008. The amounts to be paid under “Involuntary Termination Within Two Years of Change in connection withControl” also include the applicable termination event.impact on the amounts payable of two additional years of credited service under the Supplementary Plan.
(5)No additional amounts are payable upon any of the triggering events under our deferred compensation plans. For information on Mr. Keegan’s aggregate vested balance as of December 31, 2008 under the Deferred Compensation Plan, see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.


3945


Richard J. KramerDarren R. Wells (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
 
                                        
         Involuntary
         Involuntary
 
         Termination
         Termination
 
         Within Two
         Within Two
 
         Years of
         Years of
 
   Termination
     Change in
   Termination
     Change in
 
 Resignation
 Without
 Termination For
 Retirement
 Control
 Resignation
 Without
 Termination For
 Retirement
 Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1) Cause Cause (2) (3) (1) Cause Cause (2) (3) 
Annual Cash Bonus under Performance Recognition Plan  $667,400*  $667,400*     $667,400*  $667,400*
Annual Cash Incentive under Performance Recognition Plan $* $* $  $* $*
Cash Severance     1,500,000         2,588,738      1,185,000         4,470,000 
Performance Shares-Cash Component              204,653   7,592   7,592      7,592   78,965 
Cash Payout under Executive               
Performance Plan Awards  2,000,000  2,000,000     2,000,000  2,000,000
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  400,000ˆ  400,000ˆ     400,000   400,000ˆ
           
Total Cash
  2,667,400   4,167,400      2,667,400   5,460,791   407,592   1,592,592      407,592   4,948,965 
           
Equity
                                   
Restricted Stock  209,900   209,900   $209,900   209,900   209,900                
Performance Shares              204,653   7,592   7,592      7,592   78,965 
Stock Options              487,357                
           
Total Equity
  209,900   209,900   209,900   209,900   901,910   7,592   7,592      7,592   78,965 
           
Retirement Benefits
                                   
Salaried Pension Plan  92,333   92,333   92,333   92,333   92,333 
Salaried Pension Plan(4)  15,836   15,836   15,836   15,836   15,836 
Supplementary Pension Plan                              
Excess Benefits Plan  206,627   206,627   206,627   206,627   206,627 
Excess Benefit Plan(4)               
Retiree Medical                              
           
Total Retirement Benefits
  298,960   298,960   298,960   298,960   298,960   15,836   15,836   15,836   15,836   15,836 
           
Vested Deferred Compensation
  113,880   113,880   113,880   113,880   113,880                
Other Benefits
  40,769   110,873   40,769   40,769   110,873   52,269   97,627   52,269   52,269   106,477 
Excise TaxGross-Up
              1,732,992 
                      
Total
 $3,330,909  $4,901,013  $663,509  $3,330,909  $6,886,414  $483,289  $1,713,647  $68,105  $483,289  $6,883,235 
           
 
 
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
 
ˆThis amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
 
(1)Also includesIn the event of death or disability, an additional $506,123 would be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards,” and disability.Equity— Performance Shares,” if at all, only upon achievement of the applicable targets following the completion of the applicable three year performance period.
(2)Mr. Wells is not eligible for retirement.
(3)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity— Performance Shares” and “Equity— Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination, except for $13,731, representing grants of performance shares under the 2008 Performance Plan, that require an involuntary termination within two years of a change in control.
(4)The Pension Benefits Table (on page 38) shows the present value of the accumulated benefit under the Salaried Plan and the Supplementary Plan, calculated based on the assumptions set forth following that table. The amounts presented in this table reflect the additional amounts payable to Mr. Wells under the Salaried Plan due to the difference between the assumptions used in preparing the Pension Benefits Table and the assumptions used assuming a triggering event occurred on December 31, 2008. Mr. Wells is not yet vested in a Supplementary Plan benefit and would instead receive a benefit from the Excess Benefit Plan. The Supplementary Plan benefit value of $175,025 (as shown in the Pension Benefits Table) would be reduced to the Excess Benefit Plan benefit value of $131,200 if one of the triggering events occurred as of December 31, 2008.


46


Richard J. Kramer (President, North American Tire)
                     
              Involuntary
 
              Termination
 
              Within Two
 
              Years of
 
     Termination
        Change in
 
  Resignation
  Without
  Termination For
  Retirement
  Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1)  Cause  Cause  (2)  (3) 
 
Annual Cash Incentive under Performance Recognition Plan $* $* $  $* $*
Cash Severance     1,650,000         9,000,000 
Performance Shares-Cash Component  28,470   28,470      28,470   249,015 
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  1,100,000ˆ  1,100,000ˆ     1,100,000   1,100,000ˆ
                     
Total Cash
  1,128,470   2,778,470      1,128,470   10,349,015 
                     
Equity
                    
Restricted Stock  59,700   59,700   59,700   59,700   617,847 
Performance Shares  28,470   28,470      28,470   249,015 
Stock Options               
                     
Total Equity
  88,170   88,170   59,700   88,170   866,862 
                     
Retirement Benefits
                    
Salaried Pension Plan(4)  19,781   19,781   19,781   19,781   19,781 
Supplementary Pension Plan               
Excess Benefit Plan(4)               
Retiree Medical               
                     
Total Retirement Benefits
  19,781   19,781   19,781   19,781   19,781 
                     
Vested Deferred Compensation(5)
               
Other Benefits
  53,615   97,155   53,615   53,615   108,519 
Excise TaxGross-Up
              3,448,563 
                     
Total
 $1,290,036  $2,983,576  $133,096  $1,290,036  $14,792,740 
                     
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
ˆThis amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
(1)In the event of death or disability, an additional $1,228,477 would be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards,” and “Equity— Performance Shares,” if at all, only upon achievement of the applicable targets following the completion of the applicable three year performance period.
 
(2)Mr. Kramer is not eligible for retirement.
 
(3)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity— Performance Shares” and “Equity— Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination.
(4)The Pension Benefits Table (on page 38) shows the present value of the accumulated benefit under the Salaried Plan and the Supplementary Plan, calculated based on the assumptions set forth following that table. The amounts presented in this table reflect the additional amounts payable to Mr. Kramer under the Salaried Plan due to the difference between the assumptions used in preparing the Pension Benefits Table and the assumptions used assuming a triggering event occurred on December 31, 2008. Mr. Kramer is not yet vested in a Supplementary Plan benefit and would instead receive a benefit from the Excess Benefit Plan. The Supplementary Plan benefit value of $1,453,390 (as shown in the Pension Benefits Table) would be reduced to the Excess Benefit Plan benefit value of $495,153 if one of the triggering events occurred as of December 31, 2008.
(5)No additional amounts are payable upon any of the triggering events under our deferred compensation plans. For information on Mr. Kramer’s aggregate vested balance as of December 31, 2008 under the Deferred Compensation Plan, see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.


4047


Jonathan D. Rich (President, North American Tire)C. Thomas Harvie (Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary)
 
                                        
         Involuntary
          Involuntary
 
         Termination
          Termination
 
         Within Two
          Within Two
 
         Years of
          Years of
 
   Termination
 Termination
   Change in
    Termination
     Change in
 
 Resignation
 Without
 For
 Retirement
 Control
  Resignation
 Without
 Termination For
   Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1) Cause Cause (2) (3)  (1) Cause Cause Retirement (2) 
Annual Cash Bonus under Performance Recognition Plan  $200,000*  $200,000*     $200,000*  $200,000*
Annual Cash Incentive under Performance Recognition Plan $* $* $  $* $*
Cash Severance     1,282,500         2,746,754      1,290,000         6,340,000 
Performance Shares-Cash Component              142,732   45,469   45,469      45,469   150,504 
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  2,000,000  2,000,000     2,000,000  2,000,000  1,540,000ˆ  1,540,000ˆ     1,540,000   1,540,000ˆ
           
Total Cash
  2,200,000   3,482,500      2,200,000   5,089,486   1,585,469   2,875,469      1,585,469   8,030,504 
           
Equity
                                        
Restricted Stock                              
Performance Shares              142,732   45,469   45,469      45,469   150,504 
Stock Options              640,934                
           
Total Equity
              783,666   45,469   45,469      45,469   150,504 
           
Retirement Benefits
                                        
Salaried Pension Plan  142,483   142,483   $142,483   142,483   142,483 
Supplementary Pension Plan               
Excess Benefits Plan  344,063   344,063   344,063   344,063   344,063 
Salaried Pension Plan(3)  15,527   15,527   15,527   15,527   15,527 
Supplementary Pension Plan(3)              114,077 
Excess Benefit Plan               
Retiree Medical                              
           
Total Retirement Benefits
  486,546   486,546   486,546   486,546   486,546   15,527   15,527   15,527   15,527   129,604 
           
Vested Deferred Compensation
  1,264,298   1,264,298   1,264,298   1,264,298   1,264,298                
Other Benefits
  43,750   113,797   43,750   43,750   113,797   48,231   85,651   48,231   48,231   93,439 
Excise TaxGross-Up
              2,267,128 
                      
Total
 $3,994,594  $5,347,141  $1,794,594  $3,994,594  $7,737,793  $1,694,696  $3,022,116  $63,758  $1,694,696  $10,671,179 
           
 
 
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
 
This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
(1)Also includes death and disability.
(2)Mr. Rich is not eligible for retirement.
(3)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity — Performance Shares” and “Equity — Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination.


41


C.  Thomas Harvie (Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary)
                     
              Involuntary
 
              Termination
 
              Within Two
 
              Years of
 
     Termination
  Termination
     Change in
 
  Resignation
  Without
  For
     Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1)  Cause  Cause  Retirement  (2) 
 
Annual Cash Bonus under Performance Recognition Plan  $411,800*  $411,800*     $411,800*  $411,800*
Cash Severance     1,120,500         2,546,616 
Performance Shares-Cash Component  19,416   19,416      19,416   116,495 
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  2,963,334  2,963,334     2,963,334  2,963,334
Total Cash
  3,394,550   4,515,050      3,394,550   6,038,245 
Equity
                    
Restricted Stock               
Performance Shares  19,416   19,416      19,416   116,495 
Stock Options  439,607   439,607      439,607   439,607 
Total Equity
  459,023   459,023      459,023   556,102 
Retirement Benefits
                    
Salaried Pension Plan  358,679   358,679   $358,679   358,679   358,679 
Supplementary Pension Plan  3,044,693   3,044,693   3,044,693   3,044,693   3,044,693 
Excess Benefits Plan               
Retiree Medical  31,534   31,534   31,534   31,534   31,534 
Total Retirement Benefits
  3,434,906   3,434,906   3,434,906   3,434,906   3,434,906 
Vested Deferred Compensation
               
Other Benefits
  35,154   105,204   35,154   35,154   105,204 
                     
Total
  $7,323,633   $8,514,183   $3,470,060   $7,323,633   $10,134,457 
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
ˆ$1,600,000770,000 of this amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. The remaining portion would be payable, if at all, only upon achievement of the applicable targets, and following the completion of the applicable three year performance period.
 
(1)Also includes death and disability.
 
(2)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity— Performance Shares” and “Equity— Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination.
(3)The Pension Benefits Table (on page 38) shows the present value of the accumulated benefit under the Salaried Plan and the Supplementary Plan, calculated based on the assumptions set forth following that table. The amounts presented in this table reflect the additional amounts payable to Mr. Harvie due to the difference between the assumptions used in preparing the Pension Benefits Table and the assumptions used assuming a triggering event occurred on December 31, 2008. For the Supplementary Plan, the assumptions are identical, so there is no difference in benefit value. The amounts to be paid under “Involuntary Termination Within Two Years of Change in Control” also include the impact on the amounts payable of two additional years of credited service under the Supplementary Plan.


4248


Joseph M. Gingo (Executive Vice President Quality SystemsArthur de Bok (President, Europe, Middle East and Chief Technical Officer)Africa Tire)
 
                                        
         Involuntary
          Involuntary
 
         Termination
          Termination
 
         Within Two
          Within Two
 
         Years of
          Years of
 
   Termination
 Termination
   Change in
    Termination
     Change in
 
 Resignation
 Without
 For
   Control
  Resignation
 Without
 Termination For
 Retirement
 Control
 
Benefits or Payments
 (1) Cause Cause Retirement (2)  (1) Cause Cause (2) (3) 
Annual Cash Bonus under Performance Recognition Plan  $351,000*  $351,000*     $351,000*  $351,000*
Annual Cash Incentive under Performance Recognition Plan $* $* $  $* $*
Cash Severance     967,500         2,085,692   1,100,604   3,974,679      1,100,604   7,060,000 
Performance Shares-Cash Component  13,294   13,294      13,294   79,762   16,060   16,060      16,060   156,826 
Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards  2,230,000  2,230,000     2,230,000  2,230,000  870,000ˆ  870,000ˆ     870,000   870,000ˆ
           
Total Cash
  2,594,294   3,561,794      2,594,294   4,746,454   1,986,664   4,860,739      1,986,664   8,086,826 
           
Equity
                                        
Restricted Stock                             357,215 
Performance Shares  13,294   13,294      13,294   79,762   16,060   16,060      16,060   156,826 
Stock Options  336,470   336,470      336,470   336,470                
           
Total Equity
  349,764   349,764      349,764   416,232   16,060   16,060      16,060   514,041 
           
Retirement Benefits
                                        
Salaried Pension Plan  1,048,220   1,048,220   $1,048,220   1,048,220   1,048,220 
Supplementary Pension Plan  3,060,681   3,060,681   3,060,681   3,060,681   3,060,681 
Excess Benefits Plan               
Netherlands Pension Plan(4)               
Supplementary Pension Plan(4)               
Excess Benefit Plan               
Retiree Medical  63,006   63,006   63,006   63,006   63,006                
           
Total Retirement Benefits
  4,171,907   4,171,907   4,171,907   4,171,907   4,171,907                
           
Vested Deferred Compensation
  55,948   55,948   55,948   55,948   55,948                
Other Benefits
  93,239   163,038   93,239   93,239   163,038   47,462   72,462   47,462   47,462   72,462 
Excise TaxGross-Up
               
                      
Total
  $7,265,152   $8,302,451   $4,321,094   $7,265,152   $9,553,579  $2,050,186  $4,949,261  $47,462  $2,050,186  $8,673,328 
           
 
 
*This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Bonus” column.
 
ˆ$1,200,000 of thisThis amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. The remaining portion
(1)In the event of death or disability, an additional $938,494 would be payable,paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Cash Payout under Executive Performance Plan Awards,” and “Equity— Performance Shares,” if at all, only upon achievement of the applicable targets and following the completion of the applicable three year performance period.
 
(1)(2)Also includes death and disability.Mr. de Bok is not eligible for retirement.
 
(2)(3)The amounts to be paid under “Performance Shares — Cash Component,” “Equity— Performance Shares” and “Equity— Stock Options” are payable following a change in control, regardless of whether there is a subsequent termination.
(4)The Pension Benefits Table (on page 38) shows the present value of the accumulated benefits under the Supplementary Plan and the Netherlands Pension Plan, calculated based on the assumptions set forth following that table. Mr. de Bok is not yet vested in a Supplementary Plan benefit and would receive no benefit from that plan if one of the triggering events occurred as of December 31, 2008. He is not eligible to participate in the Excess Benefit Plan. The Netherlands Pension Plan benefit value of $222,384 (as shown in the Pension Benefits Table) would be reduced to $179,374 if one of the triggering events occurred as of December 31, 2008.


4349


Director Compensation
 
The table below sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during 2006.2008.
 
                                
 Fees Earned or Paid
       Fees Earned or Paid
       
 in Cash
 Stock Awards
 All Other
 Total
 in Cash
 Stock Awards
 All Other
 Total
 
Name
 ($) ($)(1) Compensation ($)(2) ($) ($) ($)(1) Compensation ($)(2) ($) 
Boland  $85,000  $172,009  $34,622  $291,631  $150,000  $(544,683) $34,186  $(360,497)
Breen(3)  130,000   269,924   1,143   401,067   20,398   (1,247,261)  2,043   (1,224,820)
Forsee  (3)  294,521   21,493   316,014 
Firestone  75,000   22,809      97,809 
Hudson(3)  75,000   233,447      308,447   20,398   (993,841)     (973,443)
McCollough  82,280   (15,315)     66,965 
Minter  56,248(4)  237,809   346   294,403   58,288(5)  (849,539)     (791,251)
Morrison  70,000   126,835      196,835   82,280   (230,849)  3,826   (144,743)
O’Neal  75,000   146,200   904   222,104   77,720   (365,376)  2,104   (285,552)
Peterson  70,000   140,075   752   210,827   75,000   (322,825)     (247,825)
Streeter(4)  17,527         17,527 
Sullivan  35,000   28,768      63,768   85,000   (75,507)     9,493 
Weidemeyer  70,000   131,066   965   202,031   85,000   (260,239)  2,252   (172,987)
Wessel  74,946   94,996   1,156   171,098   75,000   (147,181)  1,483   (70,698)
 
 
(1)Represents the amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for 2006.2008. Amounts for all directors include quarterly grants of deferred share equivalent units with a grant date fair value of $20,000$23,750 pursuant to the Outside Directors’ Equity Participation Plan. Amounts also reflect the increasechange in value of the director’s plan account from December 31, 20052007 to December 31, 2006.2008. For further information regarding such plan, see the description of the Outside Directors’ Equity Participation Plan below. For Mr. Forsee, the amount also includes additional deferred share equivalent units granted quarterly in lieu of his cash retainer, each grant in the amount of $17,500 (or $70,000 for the year). For Mr. Minter, the amount also includes additional deferred share equivalent units granted quarterly in lieu of a portion of his cash retainer, each grant in the amount of $4,688 (or $18,752totaling $19,432 for the year).year.
As of December 31, 2008, the following directors held the total number of deferred share equivalent units indicated next to his or her name:
As of December 31, 2006, the directors held the total number of deferred share equivalent units indicated next to his or her name:
 
     
Name
 Number of Units 
 
Boland  22,36530,295 
Breen  52,77456,961 
ForseeFirestone  33,2403,821 
Hudson  41,44545,632
McCollough6,631 
Minter  35,52145,128 
Morrison  8,33616,266 
O’Neal  14,35022,279 
Peterson  12,44820,377
Streeter0 
Sullivan  1,3929,321 
Weidemeyer  9,65017,579 
Wessel  4,59612,525 
 
(2)Represents reimbursement of taxes in respect of income associated with the company’sCompany’s provision of up to two sets of automobile tires per year to the directors. Beginning in 2009, the Company ceased providing reimbursement of taxes in respect of income associated with the tire program. For Messrs.Mr. Boland, and Forsee, this also includes premiumsa premium of $34,185 and $20,874, respectively,$34,186 on a life insurance policies whichpolicy that will be used to cover Goodyear’s obligation to make a charitable donation recommended by such directorshim following theirhis death, pursuant to the Director’s Charitable Award Program, as described below. The aggregate incremental cost to the companyCompany of the life insurance policiespolicy is the annual premium and related fees.
 
(3)Messrs. Breen and Hudson retired from the Board of Directors at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 8, 2008.


50


(4)Ms. Streeter was elected to the Board of Directors on October 7, 2008.
(5)Mr. ForseeMinter deferred all$19,432 of his total cash retainer for 20062008 ($70,000)77,720) in the form of deferred share equivalent units.
(4)Mr. Minter deferred $18,752 of his total cash retainer for 2006 ($75,000) in the form of deferred share equivalent units.


44


 
Goodyear directors who are not officers or employees of Goodyear or any of its subsidiaries receive, as compensation for their services as a director, a combination of cash retainer and stock awards pursuant to the Outside Directors’ Equity Participation Plan (the “Directors’ Equity Plan”).
 
For the year ended December 31, 2006,2008, outside directors received cash compensation in the amount of $17,500$18,750 per calendar quarter. The Lead Director received an additional $13,750 per calendar quarter. The chairperson of the Audit Committee received an additional $3,750$5,000 per calendar quarter and the chairpersons of all other committees received an additional $1,250$2,500 per calendar quarter. Any director who attended more than 24 board and committee meetings received $1,700 for each additional meeting attended ($1,000 if the meeting was attended by telephone). Travel and lodging expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings are paid by Goodyear. A director who is also an officer or an employee of Goodyear or any of its subsidiariesMr. Keegan does not receive additional compensation for his or her servicesservice as a director.
 
Outside directors also participate in the Directors’ Equity Plan, which is intended to further align the interests of directors with the interests of shareholders by making part of each director’s compensation dependent on the value and appreciation over time of theour Common Stock. For the year ended December 31, 2006,2008, on the first business day of each calendar quarter each eligible director who was a director for the entire preceding calendar quarter had $20,000$23,750 accrued to his or her plan account. Amounts accrued are converted into units equivalent in value to shares of common stockCommon Stock at the fair market value of the common stockCommon Stock on the accrual date. Under this plan, the units receive dividend equivalents (if dividends are paid) at the same rate as the common stock,our Common Stock, which dividends will also be converted into units in the same manner. The Directors’ Equity Plan also permits each participant annually to elect to have 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of his or her cash retainer and meeting fees deferred and converted into share equivalents on substantially the same basis.
In February 2007, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved an increase in the compensation paid to our outside directors to bring the level of director compensation more into line with market median levels based on a benchmarking process similar to that used for evaluating executive officer compensation. Effective beginning January 1, 2007, the cash retainer for outside directors increased to $18,750 per calendar quarter. In addition, the chairperson of the Audit Committee and the chairpersons of all other committees will receive an additional $1,250 per calendar quarter. The additional cash compensation for the Lead Director and the fees payable to directors who attend more than 24 board and committee meetings remained unchanged. In addition, effective beginning January 1, 2007, on the first business day of each calendar quarter each eligible director who has been a director for the entire preceding calendar quarter will have $23,750 accrued to his or her plan account under the Directors’ Equity Plan.
On February 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, stockholding guidelines for directors. These guidelines specify that a director must accumulate and hold a number of shares equal in value to five times the annual cash retainer within five years of the later of the effective date of the program or the date of election as a director. Shares owned directly and units accrued to an Outside Directors’ Equity Participation Plan account are counted as ownership in assessing compliance with the guidelines.
A participating director is entitled to benefits under the Directors’ Equity Plan after leaving the Board of Directors unless the Board of Directors elects to deny or reduce benefits. Benefits may not be denied or reduced if, prior to leaving the Board of Directors, the director either (i) attained the age of 70 with at least five years of Board service or (ii) attained the age of 65 with at least ten years of Board service. The units will be converted to a dollar value at the price of theour Common Stock on the later of the first business day of the seventh month following the month during which the participant ceases to be a director and the fifth business day of the year next following the year during which the participant ceased to be a director. Such amounts earned and vested prior to January 1, 2005, will be paid in ten annual installments or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, in a lump sum or in fewer than ten installments beginning on the fifth business day following the conversion from units to a dollar value. Amounts earned and vested after December 31, 2004, will be paid out in a lump sum on the fifth business day following the conversion from units to dollar value. Amounts in Directors’ Equity Plan accounts will earn interest from the date converted to a dollar value until paid at a rate one percent higher than the prevailing yield on United States Treasury securities having a ten-year maturity on the conversion date.
Beginning January 1, 2009, on the first business day of each calendar quarter, each eligible director will receive a grant of restricted stock units with a value of $23,750, in lieu of the stock equivalent units previously granted under the Directors’ Equity Plan, for the portion of the previous calendar quarter during which he or she served as a director. These restricted stock units will be paid to directors in shares of common stock on the fifth business day of the quarter following the quarter during which the director leaves the Board.
On February 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, stockholding guidelines for directors. These guidelines specify that a director must accumulate and hold a number of shares equal in value to five times the annual cash retainer within five years of the later of the effective date of the program or the date of election as a director. Shares owned directly and units accrued to a Directors’ Equity Plan account are counted as ownership in assessing compliance with the guidelines. The earliest compliance date for our directors is February 27, 2012. All of our directors, other than Mr. Firestone, Mr. McCollough and Ms. Streeter (who have joined Goodyear since the adoption of the guidelines), have met the required stockholding guidelines well in advance of the required compliance date.
Due to Mr. Breen’s retirement from the Board of Directors on April 8, 2008, he received a lump sum payment of the amounts deferred into the Directors’ Equity Plan of $450,561, representing the value of his 56,960 deferred share equivalent units as of January 8, 2009, the applicable conversion date with respect to his retirement. Due to Mr. Hudson’s retirement from the Board of Directors on April 8, 2008, he received a lump sum payment of the amounts deferred into the Directors’ Equity Plan of $360,952, representing the value of his 45,632 deferred share equivalent units as of January 8, 2009, the applicable conversion date with respect to his retirement.
 
Goodyear also sponsors a Directors’ Charitable Award Program funded by life insurance policies owned by Goodyear on the lives of pairs of directors. Goodyear donates $1 million per director to one or more qualifying charitable organizations recommended by each director after both of the paired directors are deceased. Assuming


51


current tax laws remain in effect, Goodyear expects to recover the cost of the program over time with the proceeds of the insurance policies purchased. Directors derive no financial benefit from the program. This program is not available to directors first elected after October 1, 2005.


45


 
OTHER MATTERS
 
During 2006,2008, Goodyear and its subsidiaries, in the ordinary course of their business and at competitive prices and terms, made sales to or purchases from, or engaged in other transactions with, corporations of which certain Goodyear non-employeenon-management directors are executive officersand/or directors. Goodyear does not consider the transactions to be material to its business and believes such transactions were not material in relation to the business of such other corporations or the interests of the directors concerned.
 
On an annual basis, each Directordirector and executive officer is obligated to complete a Director and Officer Questionnaire whichthat requires disclosure of any transactions with the Company in which the Directordirector or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the “Board of Directors and Executive Officers Conflict of Interest Policy,” Directorsdirectors and executive officers are expected to promptly disclose potential conflicts of interest to Goodyear’s General Counsel, who may consult with the Chairman of the Governance Committee on matters of interpretation of the policy. Any waivers of the policy are required to be approved by the Board of Directors, and any such waivers will be promptly disclosed to shareholders.
 
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
 
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a practical matter, we assist our directors and officers by completing and filing these reports electronically on their behalf. We believe that our directors and officers timely complied with all such filing requirements with respect to 2006.during 2008.
 
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
 
The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Goodyear’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.2009. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC are expected to be present at the annual meetingAnnual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
 
Fees Incurred by Goodyear for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC
 
The following table presents fees and expenses for services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC for fiscal 20062008 and 2005.2007.
 
                
(in thousands)
 2006 2005 
(In thousands)
 2008 2007 
Audit Fees and Expenses(1) $15,498  $16,095  $12,916  $15,086 
Audit-Related Fees and Expenses(2)  2,955   3,870   384   2,305 
Tax Fees and Expenses(3)  1,293   1,866   1,830   1,749 
All Other Fees and Expenses(4)  370   250   328   195 
          
Total $20,116  $22,081  $15,458  $19,335 
     
 
 
(1)Audit fees and expenses representsrepresent fees and expenses for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements management’s assessment ofand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and review of our quarterly financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings.
 
(2)Audit-related fees and expenses consistsconsist primarily of accounting consultations employee benefit plan audits and services related to business acquisitions and divestitures.
 
(3)Tax fees and expenses consistsconsist primarily of assistance in the preparation of international tax returns and consultations on various tax matters worldwide and, prior to June 30, 2006, expatriate tax services.worldwide.
 
(4)All other fees and expenses principally includes forensic accounting investigativeinclude fees related to an assessment of International Financial Reporting Standards, advisory services and information and education services.


52


 
All audit, audit related services,audit-related, tax services and other services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by PricewaterhouseCoopersPwC was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. The Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policy provides for pre-approval of audit, audit-related, tax services and all other fees on an annual basis and, in addition, individual engagements anticipated to exceed pre-established thresholds must be separately


46


approved. Under the policy, the Audit Committee delegates pre-approval authority to the Chair of the Committee. The Chair is to report any such pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
 
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
 
Management has the primary responsibility for the integrity of Goodyear’s financial information and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Goodyear’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for conducting independent audits of Goodyear’s financial statements management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and expressing an opinion on the financial statements management’s assessment, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based upon those audits. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the conduct of these activities by management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.PwC.
 
As part of its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements, the adequacy of financial controls and the effectiveness of Goodyear’s internal control over financial reporting with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.PwC. The Audit Committee also has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended, as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3200T, and PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2 (An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements).3200T. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) as adopted byapplicable requirements of the PCAOB in Rule 3600T,regarding PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC their independence from Goodyear.
 
Based on the review and discussions with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPwC referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that Goodyear publishinclude the audited consolidated financial statements of Goodyear and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 20062008 in Goodyear’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20062008 and in its 20062008 Annual Report to Shareholders.
 
The Audit Committee
 
James C. Boland, ChairmanJohn G. Breen
Gary D. Forsee
James C. Boland, Chairman
James A. Firestone
W. Alan McCollough
Shirley D. Peterson


4753


 
MISCELLANEOUS
 
SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALSSubmission of Shareholder Proposals
 
If a shareholder desires to have a proposal included in the proxy materials of the Board of Directors for the 20082010 annual meeting of shareholders, such proposal shall conform to the applicable proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the submission and content of proposals and must be received by Goodyear prior to the close of business on November 12, 2007.9, 2009. In addition, if a shareholder intends to present a proposal at Goodyear’s 20082010 annual meeting without the inclusion of such proposal in Goodyear’s proxy materials and written notice of such proposal is not received by Goodyear on or before January 24, 2008,23, 2010, proxies solicited by the Board of Directors for the 20082010 annual meeting will confer discretionary authority to vote on such proposal if presented at the meeting. Shareholder proposals should be sent to the executive offices of Goodyear, 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio44316-0001, Attention: Office of the Secretary. Goodyear reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
 
SAVINGS PLAN SHARESSavings Plan Shares
 
A separate “Confidential Voting Instructions” card is being sent to each employee or former employee participating in Goodyear’scertain employee savings plans. Shares of Common Stock held in the trust for these plans will be voted by the trustee as instructed by the plan participants. Shares held in the trust for which voting instructions are not received will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as it votes shares for which voting instructions were received from participants in the applicable savings plan.
 
INTERNET AND TELEPHONE VOTINGInternet and Telephone Voting
 
You may vote your shares using the Internetinternet by accessing the following web site:
 
http://www.proxyvote.com
 
or by making a toll-free telephone call within the United States of America or Canada using a touch-tone telephone to the toll-free number provided on your proxy card, or if you hold your shares in “street name,” on the voting instruction card provided by your broker or nominee.
 
SHAREHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESSShareholders Sharing The Same Address
 
Goodyear has adopted a procedure called “householding,” which has been approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under this procedure, Goodyear is delivering only one copy of the annual reportAnnual Report and proxy statementProxy Statement to multiple shareholders who share the same address and have the same last name, unless Goodyear has received contrary instructions from an affected shareholder. This procedure reduces Goodyear’s printing costs, mailing costs and fees. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.
 
Goodyear will deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the annual reportAnnual Report and the proxy statementProxy Statement to any shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of either of those documents was delivered. To receive a separate copy of the annual reportAnnual Report or proxy statement,Proxy Statement, you may write or call Goodyear’s Investor Relations Department at The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 1144 East Market Street, Akron, Ohio44316-0001, Attention: Investor Relations, telephone(330) 796-3751. You may also access Goodyear’s annual reportAnnual Report and proxy statementProxy Statement on the Investor Relations section of Goodyear’s website at www.goodyear.com.www.goodyear.com or at www.proxyvote.com.
 
If you are a holder of record and would like to revoke your householding consent and receive a separate copy of the annual reportAnnual Report or proxy statementProxy Statement in the future, please contact Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (“ADP”),Broadridge, either by calling toll free at(800) 542-1061 or by writing to ADP,Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of the revocation of your consent.
 
Any shareholders of record who share the same address and currently receive multiple copies of Goodyear’s annual reportAnnual Report and proxy statementProxy Statement who wish to receive only one copy of these materials per household in the future, please contact Goodyear’s Investor Relations Department at the address or telephone number listed above to participate in the householding program.


54


A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please contact your bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding.


48


 
FORMForm 10-K
 
GOODYEAR WILL MAIL WITHOUT CHARGE, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST, A COPY OF GOODYEAR’S ANNUAL REPORT ONFORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006,2008, INCLUDING THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND LIST OF EXHIBITS, AND ANY PARTICULAR EXHIBIT SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED. REQUESTS SHOULD BE SENT TO: THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, 1144 EAST MARKET STREET, AKRON, OHIO44316-0001, ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS. THE ANNUAL REPORT ONFORM 10-K IS ALSO AVAILABLE AT WWW.GOODYEAR.COM.WWW.GOODYEAR.COM.
 
COSTS OF SOLICITATIONCosts of Solicitation
 
The costs of soliciting proxies will be borne by Goodyear. Goodyear has retained GeorgesonD.F. King & Co., Inc., 17 State48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10004,10005, to assist in distributing proxy materials and soliciting proxies for an estimated fee of $12,500,$11,500, plus reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses. Georgeson Inc.D.F. King & Co. may solicit proxies from shareholders by mail, telephone or telegraph.the internet. In addition, officers or other employees of Goodyear may, without additional compensation therefor, solicit proxies in person or by telephone or the Internet.internet.
 
March 9, 20072009
 
By Order of the Board of Directors
 
C. THOMAS HARVIE SIGNATURE
C. Thomas Harvie, Secretary


4955


 
(GOODYEAR LOGO)
 
700-862-928-71700


(GOODYEAR LOGO)(GOODYEAR LOGO)
C/O COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 43069
PROVIDENCE, RI 02940-3069

VOTE BY INTERNET —www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 9, 2007.6, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.

VOTE BY TELEPHONE — 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 9, 2007.6, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paidpostagepaid envelope we have provided or return it to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, c/o ADP,Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you vote via the Internet or by phone,
please do not mail your card.

Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.



     
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: GOODY1 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

    DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Election of All Nominees and FOR Item 2, and AGAINST Items 3, 4 and 5.
Vote on Directors
ITEM 1.THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR
Election of All Nominees and FOR Items 2, 3 and 4.
Vote on Directors
ITEM 1. Election of Directors
NOMINEES:01) James C. Boland
02) John G. Breen
03) William J. Hudson Jr.  
04) Robert J. Keegan
05) Steven A. Minter
06) Denise M. Morrison
07) Rodney O'Neal
08) Shirley D. Peterson
09) G. Craig Sullivan
10) Thomas H. Weidemeyer
11) Michael R. Wessel
Vote on Proposals
ForAgainstAbstain
ITEM 2.  Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.ooo
ITEM 3.Shareholder Proposal re: Adopt Simple Majority Voteooo
Please sign name exactly as it appears above. Each joint owner should sign. Please indicate title if you are signing as executor, administrator, trustee, custodian, guardian or corporate officer.
YESNO
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meetingoo
For
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
ooo
             
            To withhold authority to vote for any individual
    ForWithholdFor Allnominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the
AllAllExceptnumber(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
NOMINEES:01) James C. Boland07) Shirley D. Peterson
02) James A. Firestone08) Stephanie A. Streeterooo
03) Robert J. Keegan09) G. Craig Sullivan
04) W. Alan McCollough10) Thomas H. Weidemeyer
05) Denise M. Morrison11) Michael R. Wessel
06) Rodney O’Neal
Vote on Proposals
         
    
For Against Abstain
ITEM 4.2. Shareholder Proposal re: Pay-for-Superior-PerformanceApproval of amendments to Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors. o o o
ITEM 5.3. Shareholder Proposal re: Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan PolicyApproval of an amendment to Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law. o o o
ITEM 4. Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. o o o
Please sign name exactly as it appears above. Each joint owner should sign. Please indicate title if you are signing as executor, administrator, trustee, custodian, guardian or corporate officer.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.
     
  YES NO
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting o 
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of Notice of 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.
o
   

 
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]          Date Signature (Joint Owners)          Date



Annual Meeting of shareholdersOf Shareholders
The Goodyear Tire&Rubber Company
April 10, 2007
9:00 a.m.
OfficeApril 7, 2009
9:00 A.M.
Offices Of The Company
Goodyear Theater
1201East Market Street
Akron, Ohio
PLEASE VOTE —YOUR— YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The 2009 Notice and Proxy Statement and 2008 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com
 
     GOODY2

(GOODYEAR LOGO)(GOODYEAR LOGO)
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

PROXY FOR 20072009 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned, a holder (or designated proxy) of shares of the Common Stock of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, hereby appoints C. Thomas Harvie, Richard J. KramerDarren R. Wells and Bertram Bell and each or any of them, the proxies or proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned, and to vote all of the shares of Common Stock that the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at its offices in Akron, Ohio, on Tuesday, April 10, 2007,7, 2009, at 9:00 A.M., Akron time, and at any and all adjournments thereof; with the power to vote said shares for the election of eleven Directors of the Company (with discretionary authority to cumulate votes), upon the other matters listed on the reverse side hereof and upon all other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. This Proxy is given and is to be construed according to the laws of the State of Ohio.
If you sign and return this card without marking, this proxy card will be treated as being FOR the election of Directors (with discretionary authority to cumulate votes), and FOR ItemItems 2, 3 and AGAINST the proposals listed as Items 3, 4, and 5.4.
If you plan to attend the 20072009 ANNUAL MEETING, please mark the box indicated on the reverse side.
THIS PROXY IS CONTINUED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.
PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.


(GOODYEAR LOGO)(GOODYEAR LOGO)
C/O COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 43069
PROVIDENCE, RI 02940-3069

VOTE BY INTERNET —www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 9, 2007.2, 2009. Have your proxyvoting instruction card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxyvoting instruction cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.

VOTE BY TELEPHONE — 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 9, 2007.2, 2009. Have your proxyvoting instruction card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxyvoting instruction card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, c/o ADP,Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you vote via the Internet or by phone,
please do not mail your card.

Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.



     
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: GOODY5GOODY3 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

    DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXYVOTING INSTRUCTION CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Election of All Nominees and FOR Item 2, and AGAINST Items  3, 4 and 5.
Vote on Directors
ITEM 1.THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR
Election of All Nominees and FOR Items 2, 3 and 4.
Vote on Directors
ITEM 1. Election of Directors
NOMINEES:01) James C. Boland
02) John G. Breen
03) William J. Hudson, Jr.  
04) Robert J. Keegan
05) Steven A. Minter
06) Denise M. Morrison
07) Rodney O’Neal
08) Shirley D. Peterson
09) G. Craig Sullivan
10) Thomas H. Weidemeyer
11) Michael R. Wessel
Vote on Proposals
ForAgainstAbstain
ITEM 2.Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.ooo
ITEM 3.Shareholder Proposal re: Adopt Simple Majority Voteooo
For
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
ooo
             
            To withhold authority to vote for any individual
    ForWithholdFor Allnominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the
AllAllExceptnumber(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
NOMINEES:01) James C. Boland07) Shirley D. Peterson
02) James A. Firestone08) Stephanie A. Streeterooo
03) Robert J. Keegan09) G. Craig Sullivan
04) W. Alan McCollough10) Thomas H. Weidemeyer
05) Denise M. Morrison11) Michael R. Wessel
06) Rodney O’Neal
Vote on Proposals
         
    
For Against Abstain
ITEM 4.2. Shareholder Proposal re: Pay-for-Superior-PerformanceApproval of amendments to Goodyear’s Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations to provide for the majority election of directors. o o o
ITEM 3. 
ITEM 5.Shareholder Proposal re: Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan PolicyApproval of an amendment to Goodyear’s Code of Regulations to authorize the Board of Directors to amend the Regulations to the extent permitted by the Ohio General Corporation Law. o o o
ITEM 4. Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. o o 
o


Authorization: I acknowledge receipt of the Notice of 20072009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. I hereby instruct the trustee to vote by proxy, in the form solicited by the Board of Directors, the number of full shares in this Plan account(s) as specified above, or, if not specified above, as recommended by the Board of Directors.

     
  YES NO
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting o o
   

 
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]          Date Signature (Joint Owners)          Date



Annual Meeting of shareholdersOf Shareholders
The Goodyear Tire&Rubber Company
April10, 2007
9:00 a.m.
OfficeApril 7, 2009
9:00 A.M.
Offices Of The Company
Goodyear Theater
1201East Market Street
Akron, Ohio
PLEASE VOTE—VOTE — YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The 2009 Notice and Proxy Statement and 2008 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
 
     GOODY4

(GOODYEAR LOGO)
(GOODYEAR LOGO)
CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS 20072009 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANYFOR EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND OTHER PLANS
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
April 10, 20077, 2009
The proxy soliciting materials furnished by the Board of Directors of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 10, 2007,7, 2009, are delivered herewith.
Under each employee savings or similar plan in which you participate, you have the right to give written instructions to the trustee for such plan to vote as you specify the number of full shares of Common Stock of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company representing your proportionate interest in each such plan on February 16, 2007.13, 2009.
As a participant in and a named fiduciary (i.e., the responsible party identified in the voting section of each Plan Document) under an employee savings plan or other similar plan, you have the right to direct The Northern Trust Company or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee, how to vote the shares of Common Stock of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company allocated to this account under such plan as well as a portion of any shares for which no timely voting instructions are received from other participants. Each savings plan provides that the trustee will vote the shares for which voting instructions have not been received in the same proportion as it votes the shares for which it has received such instructions unless to do so would be inconsistent with the trustee’s duties. If you wish to have the shares allocated to this account under the plan as well as a portion of any shares for which no timely voting instructions are received from other participants voted by the trustee in accordance with your instructions, please sign the authorization on the reverse side of this card and return it in the enclosed envelope or give your instructions by telephone or via the Internet.
I hereby instruct the trustee to vote (or cause to be voted) all shares of Common Stock of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company credited to this account under each plan at February 16, 200713, 2009 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 10, 20077, 2009 and at any adjournment thereof as indicated on the reverse side hereof and upon all other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Unless otherwise specified on the reverse side, if you give your instructions by signing and returning this card, or by telephone or via the Internet, the Trustee will vote FOR the election of Directors (with discretionary authority to cumulate votes), and FOR ItemItems 2, 3 and AGAINST the proposals listed as Items 3, 4 and 5.4.
If you plan to attend the 20072009 ANNUAL MEETING, please mark the box indicated on the reverse side.
THIS CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONSINSTRUCTION CARD IS CONTINUED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.
PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.